• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在调整一年随访时的基线特征后,心脏糖苷类药物与 ICD 和 CRT-ICD 患者的死亡率或住院率增加无关:来自德国 DEVICE 登记处的结果。

Cardiac glycosides are not associated with increased mortality or hospitalization rates in ICD and CRT-ICD patients after adjustment for baseline-characteristics at one-year follow-up: Results from the German DEVICE registry.

机构信息

Clinic for Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (IHF), Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2021 Sep 1;338:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.047. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.047
PMID:34087337
Abstract

AIMS

Despite lacking supporting randomized trials, cardiac glycosides (CGs) are widely used in heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation. Moreover, several pro- and retrospective studies and registry-data have recently raised serious concerns in terms of efficacy and safety of CGs in this field. We have therefore examined the association between CGs and clinical outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization (CRT-ICD) patients of the large German DEVICE registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2014, 3782 ICD and 1529 CRT-ICD patients were enrolled in the German DEVICE registry. Those two groups were analyzed independently according to medication with or without CGs. After adjustment for patient characteristics, CGs were not significantly associated with increased one-year mortality (HR 1.27, 95%-CI 0.91-1.76, p = 0.162), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR 1.36, 95%-CI 0.98-1.89, p = 0.063), ICD-shocks (OR 1.29, 95%-CI 0.95-1.74, p = 0.104) or the need for rehospitalization in ICD patients at one-year-follow-up. Similar findings were obtained in CRT-ICD patients. Regarding possible determinants for glycoside treatment, atrial fibrillation at enrollment was found to be most strongly associated with the prescription of glycosides in ICD (adjusted OR 3.25, 95%-CI 2.63-4.02) and CRT-ICD patients (adjusted OR 3.17, 95%-CI 2.39-4.19).

CONCLUSION

Overall harmful effects of CGs in ICD- and CRT-ICD patients could not be confirmed in DEVICE. Further large and randomized-controlled trials that investigate dose-dependent effects of CGs in addition to contemporary therapy of heart failure and atrial fibrillation are needed.

摘要

目的

尽管缺乏支持性的随机临床试验,心脏糖苷(CGs)仍广泛用于心力衰竭和/或心房颤动。此外,最近一些前瞻性和回顾性研究和注册数据对 CG 在该领域的疗效和安全性提出了严重关切。因此,我们检查了大型德国 DEVICE 注册中心植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步(CRT-ICD)患者中 CG 与临床结局之间的关联。

方法和结果

2007 年至 2014 年间,3782 例 ICD 和 1529 例 CRT-ICD 患者入组德国 DEVICE 注册中心。根据有无 CG 用药情况,将这两组患者独立进行分析。调整患者特征后,CG 与一年死亡率增加无关(HR 1.27,95%-CI 0.91-1.76,p=0.162)、主要不良心脑血管事件(OR 1.36,95%-CI 0.98-1.89,p=0.063)、ICD 电击(OR 1.29,95%-CI 0.95-1.74,p=0.104)或 ICD 患者一年随访时再住院需求。在 CRT-ICD 患者中也得到了类似的发现。关于糖苷治疗的可能决定因素,入组时的心房颤动被发现与 ICD(调整后的 OR 3.25,95%-CI 2.63-4.02)和 CRT-ICD 患者(调整后的 OR 3.17,95%-CI 2.39-4.19)中 CG 处方最密切相关。

结论

在 DEVICE 中,无法证实 CG 在 ICD 和 CRT-ICD 患者中的总体有害影响。需要进一步进行大型、随机对照试验,以研究 CG 在心力衰竭和心房颤动的当代治疗基础上的剂量依赖性作用。

相似文献

1
Cardiac glycosides are not associated with increased mortality or hospitalization rates in ICD and CRT-ICD patients after adjustment for baseline-characteristics at one-year follow-up: Results from the German DEVICE registry.在调整一年随访时的基线特征后,心脏糖苷类药物与 ICD 和 CRT-ICD 患者的死亡率或住院率增加无关:来自德国 DEVICE 登记处的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Sep 1;338:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.047. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
2
Selection and outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy: Comparison of 4384 patients from the German Device Registry to randomized controlled trials.接受和未接受心脏再同步治疗的植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的选择及预后:德国器械注册中心4384例患者与随机对照试验的比较
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;33(3):483-492. doi: 10.1111/jce.15365. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry.心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者心脏再同步治疗的比较效果:来自国家心血管数据注册中心植入式心律转复除颤器注册研究的结果
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002324.
4
Use and Outcomes of Dual Chamber or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators Among Older Patients Requiring Ventricular Pacing in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry.在国家心血管数据注册植入式心脏复律除颤器登记处中,需要心室起搏的老年患者使用双腔或心脏再同步治疗除颤器的情况和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2035470. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35470.
5
Impact of diabetes on clinical outcome of patients with heart failure undergoing ICD and CRT procedures: results from the German Device Registry.糖尿病对接受 ICD 和 CRT 治疗的心力衰竭患者临床结局的影响:来自德国器械注册研究的数据。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):984-995. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12613. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Comparison of left ventricular lead upgrade vs continued medical care among patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy at the time of defibrillator generator replacement: Predictors of left ventricular lead upgrade and associations with long-term outcomes.在更换除颤器发生器时适合心脏再同步治疗的患者中,比较左心室导线升级与继续医疗护理:左心室导线升级的预测因素及其与长期结局的关系。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Nov;17(11):1878-1886. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
7
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: results from the Resynchronization for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT).心脏再同步治疗永久性心房颤动患者:来自心力衰竭门诊同步治疗试验(RAFT)的结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):566-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.968867. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
8
Comparing outcome of patients with coronary artery disease and dilated cardiomyopathy in ICD and CRT recipients: data from the German DEVICE-registry.比较 ICD 和 CRT 治疗患者的冠心病和扩张型心肌病患者的结局:来自德国 DEVICE 登记研究的数据。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2013 Jul;102(7):513-21. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0559-0. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
9
Clinical effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in men and women with heart failure: findings from IMPROVE HF.心力衰竭男性和女性心脏再同步和植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的临床效果:来自 IMPROVE HF 的研究结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Jan;7(1):146-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000789. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
10
Impact of atrial fibrillation on early complications and one year-survival after cardioverter defibrillator implantation: results from the German DEVICE registry.心房颤动对植入式心脏复律除颤器植入术后早期并发症及一年生存率的影响:来自德国DEVICE注册研究的结果
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):4184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Pacemaker Versus Defibrillator Therapy in Patients Eligible for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy: Evidence from the German Device Registry.心脏再同步治疗适用患者中起搏器与除颤器治疗的比较:来自德国器械注册库的证据
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 10;14(4):1137. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041137.
2
The new European Society of Cardiology guideline for the management of cardiomyopathies: key messages for cardiac electrophysiologists.欧洲心脏病学会心肌病管理新指南:心脏电生理学家的关键信息。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2023 Dec;34(4):311-323. doi: 10.1007/s00399-023-00975-y. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
3
Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
洋地黄对植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)或心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(CRT-D)接受者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 20;12(4):1686. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041686.