Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
Prince Rupert Regional Hospital, Prince Rupert, BC.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Dec;43(12):1395-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
This study compared pregnancy-related cardiovascular disease risk indicators between women who attended 2 different postpartum screening and education clinics: 1 at an urban tertiary care centre and 1 at a northern, rural community hospital. Risk differences associated with ethnicity were also examined.
We conducted a retrospective record review that compared data from an urban clinic in Kingston, Ontario (n = 675) with those from a rural clinic in Prince Rupert, British Columbia (n = 65). Patients who had a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, intrauterine growth restriction, idiopathic preterm birth, or placental abruption attended the clinics at 6 months postpartum. Demographic information, personal and family history, physical examination findings, and laboratory results were collected and used to generate cardiovascular risk estimates using validated scoring systems. These estimates were compared between clinic populations and between ethnic subsets.
Fifty-five percent of the Prince Rupert cohort were Indigenous, while 87% of the Kingston cohort were White (P < 0.001). A greater proportion of the Kingston cohort had experienced hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (P = 0.002), while a greater proportion of the Prince Rupert cohort had developed gestational diabetes (P=0.010). The Prince Rupert population had higher lifetime and 30-year cardiovascular disease risk scores (P = 0.008 and P = 0.005, respectively). Indigenous patients had more major cardiovascular risk factors as well as higher lifetime and 30-year cardiovascular risk scores (P = 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively) than White and Asian patients.
The increased cardiovascular disease risk in both rural and Indigenous women supports the need for better postpartum care, long-term follow-up, and early promotion of cardiovascular health in these populations.
本研究比较了在两家不同的产后筛查和教育诊所就诊的女性的妊娠相关心血管疾病风险指标:一家位于安大略省金斯顿的城市三级保健中心,另一家位于不列颠哥伦比亚省鲁珀特王子港的北部农村社区医院。还检查了与族裔相关的风险差异。
我们进行了一项回顾性病历回顾,比较了安大略省金斯顿市的一家城市诊所(n=675)和不列颠哥伦比亚省鲁珀特王子港的一家农村诊所(n=65)的数据。患有妊娠高血压疾病、妊娠期糖尿病、宫内生长受限、特发性早产或胎盘早剥的患者在产后 6 个月就诊于这些诊所。收集了人口统计学信息、个人和家族史、体格检查结果和实验室结果,并使用经过验证的评分系统生成心血管风险估计值。这些估计值在诊所人群之间和族裔亚组之间进行了比较。
鲁珀特王子港队列的 55%是土著人,而金斯顿队列的 87%是白人(P<0.001)。金斯顿队列中经历过妊娠高血压疾病的比例更高(P=0.002),而鲁珀特王子港队列中发生妊娠期糖尿病的比例更高(P=0.010)。鲁珀特王子港人群的终生和 30 年心血管疾病风险评分更高(P=0.008 和 P=0.005)。与白人及亚裔患者相比,土著患者有更多的主要心血管危险因素,以及更高的终生和 30 年心血管疾病风险评分(P=0.001 和 P=0.008)。
农村和土著妇女心血管疾病风险增加,支持这些人群需要更好的产后护理、长期随访和早期促进心血管健康。