Alvarez Secord Angeles, O'Malley David M, Sood Anil K, Westin Shannon N, Liu Joyce F
Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Division of Gynecology Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States.
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Aug;162(2):482-495. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and angiogenesis have demonstrated single-agent activity in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Recent studies have aimed to establish whether combination therapy can augment the response seen with PARP inhibitors or antiangiogenic agents alone. This review provides an overview of PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenics as monotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer, explores potential mechanisms of action of PARP inhibitor and antiangiogenic combination treatments, reviews efficacy and safety data from trials evaluating this combination, and outlines ongoing and future trials evaluating this combination, discussing these in the context of the current and future treatment landscape for women with advanced ovarian cancer. Sentinel studies evaluating PARP inhibitor (n = 8), antiangiogenic (n = 4), and combination (n = 7) therapy were identified in women with newly diagnosed (n = 7) and recurrent (n = 12) ovarian cancer. PARP inhibitors included olaparib (n = 9), niraparib (n = 4), rucaparib (n = 1), and veliparib (n = 1). Antiangiogenic agents included bevacizumab (n = 7) and cediranib (n = 4). PARP inhibitors combined with antiangiogenics demonstrated efficacy based on objective response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) in the relapsed disease setting. Maintenance therapy with the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, plus antiangiogenic therapy offered a significant PFS benefit versus the antiangiogenic alone in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who tested positive for homologous recombination deficiency. Combination therapy was tolerated, with no new safety signals reported compared with monotherapy trials. PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenics have changed the landscape of ovarian cancer treatment. The PARP inhibitor plus antiangiogenic combination is a novel treatment option that appears promising in the first-line advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer settings, although the role of this combination in recurrent disease requires further elucidation. Defining which patients are candidates for monotherapy or combination therapy is critical, taking into consideration safety profiles of therapies alone or in combination, and how these treatments should be sequenced in clinical practice.
聚(ADP - 核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂和血管生成抑制剂已在晚期卵巢癌女性患者中显示出单药活性。最近的研究旨在确定联合治疗是否能增强PARP抑制剂或抗血管生成药物单独使用时的疗效。本综述概述了PARP抑制剂和抗血管生成药物在晚期卵巢癌女性患者中的单药治疗情况,探讨了PARP抑制剂与抗血管生成联合治疗的潜在作用机制,回顾了评估这种联合治疗的试验中的疗效和安全性数据,并概述了正在进行和未来评估这种联合治疗的试验,在晚期卵巢癌女性患者当前和未来治疗格局的背景下进行讨论。在新诊断(n = 7)和复发性(n = 12)卵巢癌女性患者中确定了评估PARP抑制剂(n = 8)、抗血管生成药物(n = 4)和联合治疗(n = 7)的哨兵研究。PARP抑制剂包括奥拉帕利(n = 9)、尼拉帕利(n = 4)、芦卡帕利(n = 1)和维利帕利(n = 1)。抗血管生成药物包括贝伐单抗(n = 7)和西地尼布(n = 4)。PARP抑制剂与抗血管生成药物联合使用在复发疾病情况下基于客观缓解率和无进展生存期(PFS)显示出疗效。对于新诊断的晚期卵巢癌且同源重组缺陷检测呈阳性的女性患者,使用PARP抑制剂奥拉帕利联合抗血管生成治疗进行维持治疗与单独使用抗血管生成药物相比,PFS有显著获益。联合治疗耐受性良好,与单药治疗试验相比未报告新的安全信号。PARP抑制剂和抗血管生成药物改变了卵巢癌的治疗格局。PARP抑制剂加抗血管生成药物联合治疗是一种新的治疗选择,在一线晚期和复发性卵巢癌情况下似乎很有前景,尽管这种联合治疗在复发性疾病中的作用需要进一步阐明。考虑到单独或联合治疗的安全性概况以及这些治疗在临床实践中应如何排序,确定哪些患者适合单药治疗或联合治疗至关重要。