• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 PI-RADS 4 和 5 靶区的患者中进行管内 MRI 引导下前列腺活检:单中心经验。

In-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy in a patient group with PI-RADS 4 and 5 targets: A single center experience.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, VKF American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Urology, VKF American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2021 Aug;141:109785. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109785. Epub 2021 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109785
PMID:34091134
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic yield of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided in-bore biopsy in patients with high likelihood multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) findings, regarding overall and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates and concordance of biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) Gleason scores (GS).

METHODS

This retrospective study consisted of 277 Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) assessment category 4 and 5 targets in 246 patients (mean age, 65.7 years; median prostate specific antigen value, 7.75 ng/mL) who had undergone in-bore biopsy at our institution between 2012 and 2020. Eighty-one patients who underwent RP were eligible for the concordance analysis of biopsy and RP specimen GS.

RESULTS

Overall PCa detection rates were 80.5 % per patient (198/246) and 78 % per target (216/277) and 83.5 % and 67.4 % in primary (biopsy naive) and secondary (at least one negative prior biopsy) settings. csPCa was found in 63 % overall, 66 % of patients (132/200) in the primary, and 50 % of patients (23/46) in the secondary biopsy settings (p < 0.001). The prostate cancer detection rate was 68 % and 92 % in PI-RADS 4 and 5, respectively (p < 0.001). In the radical prostatectomy subcohort, 27.2 % of patients were upgraded, 8.6 % of patients were downgraded from needle biopsy. Significant complications occurred in 1.2 % of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsy has a high detection rate of csPCa in primary and secondary biopsy cohorts. Biopsy results were satisfactory in terms of the number of positive cores, cancer percentage in positive cores, and concordance of GS in needle biopsy and RP specimen.

摘要

目的

确定高可能性多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)发现的患者中磁共振成像(MRI)引导下腔内活检的诊断产量,关于整体和临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)检测率以及活检和根治性前列腺切除术(RP)Gleason 评分(GS)的一致性。

方法

本回顾性研究包括 246 名患者的 277 个前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评估类别 4 和 5 目标(平均年龄 65.7 岁;中位前列腺特异性抗原值 7.75ng/ml),他们于 2012 年至 2020 年间在我们机构进行了腔内活检。81 名接受 RP 的患者符合活检和 RP 标本 GS 一致性分析的条件。

结果

患者的总体 PCa 检出率为 80.5%(246/246)和 78%(277/277),主要(活检初治)和次要(至少一次阴性既往活检)设置的靶标为 83.5%和 67.4%。总体 csPCa 检出率为 63%,66%的患者(200/200)在主要组中,50%的患者(46/46)在次要活检组中(p<0.001)。PI-RADS 4 和 5 的前列腺癌检出率分别为 68%和 92%(p<0.001)。在根治性前列腺切除术亚组中,27.2%的患者升级,8.6%的患者从针活检降级。1.2%的患者发生了显著并发症。

结论

MRI 引导下腔内前列腺活检在主要和次要活检组中具有较高的 csPCa 检出率。在阳性核心数量、阳性核心中癌症百分比以及针活检和 RP 标本 GS 的一致性方面,活检结果令人满意。

相似文献

1
In-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy in a patient group with PI-RADS 4 and 5 targets: A single center experience.在 PI-RADS 4 和 5 靶区的患者中进行管内 MRI 引导下前列腺活检:单中心经验。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Aug;141:109785. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109785. Epub 2021 May 21.
2
3-T Multiparametric MRI Followed by In-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检阴性后,3-T 多参数 MRI 引导下腔内活检用于检测临床显著前列腺癌。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Sep;215(3):660-666. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22455. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
3
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与指数病变和多灶性、临床显著前列腺癌的相关性。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
Accuracy of Sampling PI-RADS 4-5 Index Lesions Alone by MRI-guided In-bore Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.MRI 引导下腔内活检对 PI-RADS 4-5 指数病变的采样准确率在初次接受根治性前列腺切除术的活检患者中的评估。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):249-254. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Efficacy of 3T Multiparametric MR Imaging followed by 3T in-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Based on PIRADSv2.1 Score.基于PIRADSv2.1评分,3T多参数磁共振成像联合3T磁共振引导穿刺活检对临床显著性前列腺癌的检测效能
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1619-1626. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer.回顾性比较直接在管内磁共振成像(MRI)引导下活检和融合引导下活检在 MRI 病变患者中,这些病变可能或高度可能是临床上有意义的前列腺癌。
World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1849-1855. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2085-6. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
7
Evaluation of Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy Compared to Transrectal Systematic Biopsy in the Prediction of Tumour Aggressiveness in Patients with Previously Negative Biopsy.经会阴磁共振成像/超声融合活检与经直肠系统活检在预测既往活检阴性患者肿瘤侵袭性方面的比较评估
Urol Int. 2019;102(1):20-26. doi: 10.1159/000492495. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
8
Evaluating the diagnostic role of in-bore magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy: a single-centre study.评估腔内磁共振引导前列腺活检的诊断作用:单中心研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jun;92(6):1486-1491. doi: 10.1111/ans.17713. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
9
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.多参数磁共振成像(MRI)和 MRI-经直肠超声融合活检用于检测起始肿瘤:与根治性前列腺切除术标本的相关性。
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):846-853. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
10
The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.前列腺癌活检前多参数磁共振成像的诊断准确性。
BJU Int. 2019 Jan;123(1):82-90. doi: 10.1111/bju.14420. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiparametric MRI to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading and Downgrading at Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Presurgical Biopsy.与术前活检相比,多参数磁共振成像预测前列腺癌根治术时Gleason评分的升级和降级
Korean J Radiol. 2025 May;26(5):422-434. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.1008. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
2
Machine learning prediction of Gleason grade group upgrade between in-bore biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.机器学习预测穿刺活检与根治性前列腺切除术后病理检查之间的Gleason分级组升级情况。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 11;14(1):5849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56415-5.
3
The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy.
在接受腔内MRI引导下前列腺活检的PI-RADS 4类病变患者中,索引病灶的大小和数量在临床显著前列腺癌诊断中的作用。
World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):449-454. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04274-y. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
4
The use of advanced imaging in guiding the further investigation and treatment of primary prostate cancer.在指导原发性前列腺癌的进一步检查和治疗中使用先进的影像学方法。
Cancer Imaging. 2022 Sep 3;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00481-3.