OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicological profile of gadopiclenol, a new high-relaxivity macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), in renally impaired rats, in comparison with 2 other macrocyclic GBCAs, gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol, and 1 linear and nonionic GBCA, gadodiamide. METHODS: Renal failure was induced by adding 0.75% wt/wt adenine to the diet for 3 weeks. During the second week of adenine-enriched diet, the animals (n = 8/group × 5 groups) received 5 consecutive intravenous injections of GBCA at 2.5 mmol/kg per injection, resulting in a cumulative dose of 12.5 mmol/kg or saline followed by a 3-week treatment-free period after the last injection. The total (elemental) gadolinium (Gd) concentration in different tissues (brain, cerebellum, femoral epiphysis, liver, skin, heart, kidney, spleen, plasma, urine, and feces) was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Transmission electron microscopy (and electron energy loss spectroscopy analysis of metallic deposits) was used to investigate the presence and localization of Gd deposits in the skin. Relaxometry was used to evaluate the presence of dissociated Gd in the skin, liver, and bone. Skin histopathology was performed to investigate the presence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like lesions. RESULTS: Gadodiamide administrations were associated with high morbidity-mortality but also with macroscopic and microscopic skin lesions in renally impaired rats. No such effects were observed with gadopiclenol, gadoterate, or gadobutrol. Overall, elemental Gd concentrations were significantly higher in gadodiamide-treated rats than in rats treated with the other GBCAs for all tissues except the liver (where no significant difference was found with gadopiclenol) and the kidney and the heart (where statistically similar Gd concentrations were observed for all GBCAs). No plasma biochemical abnormalities were observed with gadopiclenol or the control GBCAs. Histopathology revealed a normal skin structure in the rats treated with gadopiclenol, gadoterate, and gadobutrol, contrary to those treated with gadodiamide. No evidence of Gd deposits on collagen fibers and inclusions in fibroblasts was found with gadopiclenol and its macrocyclic controls, unlike with gadodiamide. Animals of all test groups had Gd-positive lysosomal inclusions in the dermal macrophages. However, the textures differed for the different products (speckled texture for gadodiamide and rough-textured appearance for the 2 tested macrocyclic GBCAs). CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of biochemical toxicity or pathological abnormalities of the skin was observed, and similar to other macrocyclic GBCAs, gadoterate and gadobutrol, tissue retention of Gd was found to be low (except in the liver) in renally impaired rats treated with the new high-relaxivity GBCA gadopiclenol.