Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland, Australia; Australasian Centre for Rail Innovation, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland, Australia.
J Safety Res. 2021 Jun;77:170-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
Current signage at intersections is designed for attentive pedestrians who are looking ahead. Such signage may not be sufficient when distracted by smartphones. Illuminated in-ground LED lights at crossings are an innovative solution to alert distracted pedestrians.
We conducted a field study at a railway crossing equipped with in-ground lights to assess whether distracted pedestrians (N = 34, Mean age 33.6 ± 8.6 years) could detect these lights and how this impacted on their visual scanning and crossing behaviour. This involved a 2 × 3 repeated measures design exploring the impact of the presence (treatment) or absence (control) of in-ground lights (treatment) at a crossing, and a distractor task presented through a mobile device (none, visual, and audio) on eye movements recorded using an eye tracker, and verbal reporting of when participants detected the lights.
Participants engaged in the distraction tasks as evidenced by their accuracy and reaction times in all conditions. With both the audio and visual distraction tasks, participants looked at the in-ground LEDs and detected their activation as accurately as when not distracted (95%). While most participants detected the lights at their activation, visual distraction resulted in 10% of the detections occurring as participants entered the rail corridor, suggesting effectiveness in gaining pedestrians' attention. Further, participants were significantly less likely to check for trains when visually distracted (70%), a 10% reduction compared to the no or audio distractor conditions (80% and 78% respectively). The introduction of the in-ground lights resulted in appropriate scanning of the rail tracks (77% and 78% for the visual and auditory distractor tasks respectively) similar to that of non-distracted participants for the crossing without lights (80%).
Our findings indicate that illuminated in-ground lights could be useful in attracting the attention of distracted pedestrians at railway level crossings, and possibly at other road intersections. Practical Applications: Illuminated in-ground lights can be installed at rail and road intersections with known pedestrian distraction as a countermeasure. Further research is necessary to understand their long-term effects.
目前交叉口的标志设计是针对注意力集中的行人,他们会向前看。但是当行人被智能手机分心时,这种标志可能就不够了。交叉路口处的照明地下 LED 灯是一种提醒分心行人的创新解决方案。
我们在一个配备地下灯的铁路道口进行了现场研究,以评估分心的行人(N=34,平均年龄 33.6±8.6 岁)是否能够检测到这些灯,以及这对他们的视觉扫描和穿越行为有何影响。这涉及到一个 2×3 的重复测量设计,该设计探索了在交叉路口存在(治疗)或不存在(对照)地下灯(治疗)以及通过移动设备呈现的分心任务(无、视觉和音频)对使用眼动追踪器记录的眼动的影响,以及参与者何时检测到灯光的口头报告。
参与者在所有条件下都进行了分心任务,这从他们的准确性和反应时间中可以看出。在有音频和视觉干扰任务的情况下,参与者会看向地下 LED 灯并准确地检测到它们的激活(95%)。虽然大多数参与者在激活时都能检测到灯光,但视觉干扰导致 10%的检测是在参与者进入轨道走廊时发生的,这表明它们能够吸引行人的注意力。此外,当视觉分心时,参与者检查火车的可能性明显降低(70%),与无干扰或音频干扰条件(分别为 80%和 78%)相比降低了 10%。引入地下灯后,参与者对轨道的扫描变得更加适当(视觉和听觉干扰任务的分别为 77%和 78%),与无灯光时非分心参与者的扫描(80%)相似。
我们的研究结果表明,在铁路平交道口和可能在其他道路交叉口,地下照明灯可以吸引分心行人的注意力。需要进一步的研究来了解它们的长期效果。
在已知有行人分心的铁路和道路交叉口可以安装地下照明灯作为一种对策。