Suppr超能文献

一项针对主要泌尿外科会议中“男性主导会议”(Manels)现象发生率的定量分析研究。

A Quantitative Analysis Investigating the Prevalence of "Manels" in Major Urology Meetings.

机构信息

S.H. Ho UrologyCentre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Division of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2021 Oct;80(4):442-449. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.031. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Female representation in urological meetings is important for gender equity.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to examine the prevalence of "manels" or all-male speaking panels at urological meetings.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Urology meetings organized by major urological associations/societies from December 2019 to November 2020 were reviewed. Meeting information and details of the faculty were retrieved.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Primary outcomes were: (1) the percentage of male faculty in all included sessions and (2) the overall proportion of manels. We made further comparisons between manel and multigender sessions. Male and female faculty were stratified by quartiles of publications, citations, and H-index, and their mean numbers of sessions were compared.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Among 285 meeting sessions, 181 (63.5%) were manels. The mean percentage of male faculty was 86.9%. Male representation was very high in urology meetings for most disciplines and urological associations/societies, except for female urology meeting sessions and those organized by the International Continence Society. Nonmanel sessions had higher numbers of chairs/moderators (p = 0.027), speakers (p < 0.001), and faculty (p < 0.001) than manel sessions. A total of 1037 faculty members were included, and 900 of them (86.8%) were male. Male faculty had longer mean years of practice (23.8 vs 17.7 yr, p < 0.001) and was more likely to include professors (43.2% vs 17.5%, p < 0.001) than female faculty. Male faculty within the first quartile (ie, lower quartile) of publications and H-index had a significantly higher number of sessions than female faculty within the same quartile.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that manels are prevalent in urology meetings. There is evidence showing that males received more opportunities than females. A huge gender imbalance exists in urology meetings; urological associations and societies should actively strive for greater gender parity.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Women are under-represented in urology meetings. Urological associations and societies should play an active role to ensure a more balanced gender representation.

摘要

背景

女性在泌尿科会议中的代表性对于性别平等至关重要。

目的

我们旨在调查泌尿科会议中全男性演讲小组(即“manels”)的流行程度。

设计、地点和参与者:对 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 11 月期间由主要泌尿科协会/学会组织的泌尿科会议进行了审查。检索会议信息和教职员工的详细信息。

结果测量和统计分析

主要结果为:(1)所有纳入会议中男性教职员工的百分比;(2)manels 的总体比例。我们进一步比较了 manel 和多性别会议。按出版物、引用和 H 指数的四分位数对男性和女性教职员工进行分层,并比较他们的平均会议次数。

结果和局限性

在 285 个会议中,有 181 个(63.5%)是 manels。男性教职员工的平均百分比为 86.9%。除了女性泌尿科会议和国际尿控协会组织的会议外,男性在泌尿科会议的大多数学科和泌尿科协会/学会中代表比例非常高。非 manel 会议的主席/主持人(p=0.027)、演讲者(p<0.001)和教职员工(p<0.001)人数均高于 manel 会议。共有 1037 名教职员工入选,其中 900 名(86.8%)为男性。男性教职员工的平均从业年限较长(23.8 与 17.7 年,p<0.001),且更有可能是教授(43.2% 与 17.5%,p<0.001),而非女性教职员工。在出版物和 H 指数的第一四分位数(即较低四分位数)内的男性教职员工的会议次数明显多于同一四分位数内的女性教职员工。

结论

我们的研究表明,manels 在泌尿科会议中很普遍。有证据表明,男性比女性获得的机会更多。泌尿科会议中存在巨大的性别失衡;泌尿科协会和学会应积极努力实现更大的性别均等。

患者总结

女性在泌尿科会议中的代表性不足。泌尿科协会和学会应发挥积极作用,确保更平衡的性别代表性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验