• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筋膜治疗与手法治疗(HVLA)治疗慢性颈痛患者的随机对照试验。

Fascial treatment versus manual therapy (HVLA) in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Praxis für Osteopathie und Naturheilkunde, Geestland, Germany.

Faszium GbR, Altenholz, Germany.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(6):997-1006. doi: 10.3233/BMR-191731.

DOI:10.3233/BMR-191731
PMID:34092587
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a common health problem in western industrialized nations. In recent years, the fascial tissue has attracted the attention of therapists, and a treatment of the fasciae promises to be a meaningful approach in the therapy of patients with CNP.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a fascial treatment (FT) compared to manual therapy (MT) and to no intervention (control group, CG) in patients with CNP.

METHODS

Sixty participants with CNP were randomized into three groups. Primary outcome parameters were pain intensity as measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS), and severity of illness as measured by the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD). Secondary outcome parameter was the range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine.

RESULTS

Repeated measures t-tests demonstrated significant decreases with medium to large effect sizes for the FT (VAS: dR⁢M= 1.14; NPAD: dR⁢M= 0.51) and for the MT (VAS: dR⁢M= 1.15; NPAD: dR⁢M= 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirmed the effectiveness of MT on pain and severity of illness in the treatment of patients suffering from CNP. Furthermore, the results demonstrated the effectiveness and clinical relevance of FT for this population.

摘要

背景

慢性颈部疼痛(CNP)是西方国家常见的健康问题。近年来,筋膜组织引起了治疗师的关注,筋膜治疗有望成为 CNP 患者治疗的一种有意义的方法。

目的

本研究旨在比较筋膜治疗(FT)与手动治疗(MT)和无干预(对照组,CG)对 CNP 患者的疗效。

方法

60 名 CNP 患者随机分为三组。主要观察指标为视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量的疼痛强度和颈部疼痛和残疾量表(NPAD)测量的疾病严重程度。次要观察指标为颈椎活动范围(ROM)。

结果

重复测量 t 检验显示,FT(VAS:dR⁢M=1.14;NPAD:dR⁢M=0.51)和 MT(VAS:dR⁢M=1.15;NPAD:dR⁢M=0.72)均有显著下降,具有中到大效应量。

结论

我们的结果证实了 MT 对 CNP 患者疼痛和疾病严重程度的治疗效果。此外,结果还表明 FT 对该人群具有有效性和临床相关性。

相似文献

1
Fascial treatment versus manual therapy (HVLA) in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.筋膜治疗与手法治疗(HVLA)治疗慢性颈痛患者的随机对照试验。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(6):997-1006. doi: 10.3233/BMR-191731.
2
Is one better than another?: A randomized clinical trial of manual therapy for patients with chronic neck pain.一种疗法比另一种更好吗?:一项针对慢性颈痛患者的手法治疗随机临床试验。
Man Ther. 2014 Jun;19(3):215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.12.002. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
3
Efficacy of dry needling as an adjunct to manual therapy for patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomised clinical trial.干针疗法作为慢性机械性颈痛患者手法治疗的辅助手段的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Acupunct Med. 2020 Aug;38(4):244-254. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2018-011682. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Immediate Effects of Osteopathic Treatment Versus Therapeutic Exercise on Patients With Chronic Cervical Pain.整骨疗法与治疗性运动对慢性颈痛患者的即时影响。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2018 May;24(3):24-32.
5
Mobilization versus manipulations versus sustain apophyseal natural glide techniques and interaction with psychological factors for patients with chronic neck pain: randomized controlled trial.慢性颈痛患者的活动疗法、手法治疗、维持骨骺自然滑动技术及其与心理因素的相互作用:随机对照试验
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Apr;51(2):121-32. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
6
Does the Addition of Manual Therapy Approach to a Cervical Exercise Program Improve Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Neck Pain in Short- and Mid-Term? A Randomized Controlled Trial.手法治疗联合颈椎锻炼对慢性颈痛患者短期和中期临床结局的影响:一项随机对照试验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;17(18):6601. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186601.
7
Comparative effectiveness and economic evaluation of Chuna manual therapy for chronic neck pain: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.中医整脊手法治疗慢性颈痛的比较疗效与经济学评价:一项多中心随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3016-6.
8
A Comparison of the Effects of Stabilization Exercises Plus Manual Therapy to Those of Stabilization Exercises Alone in Patients With Nonspecific Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一项比较稳定化练习联合手法治疗与单纯稳定化练习对非特异性机械性颈痛患者疗效的随机临床试验。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;46(2):44-55. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.5979. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Is a combined programme of manual therapy and exercise more effective than usual care in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain? A randomized controlled trial.手法治疗与运动相结合的方案是否比常规护理更有效?一项随机对照试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Dec;33(12):1908-1918. doi: 10.1177/0269215519876675. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
10
Efficacy of tuina in patients with chronic neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.推拿治疗慢性颈部疼痛患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Jan 17;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3096-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review on biomechanical effects of high-velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation.关于高速低幅脊柱推拿生物力学效应的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0328048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328048. eCollection 2025.
2
The majority of clinical trials assessing mobilization and manipulation for neck pain lack a pragmatic approach: a systematic review of 174 trials.大多数评估颈部疼痛的动员和手法治疗的临床试验缺乏实用方法:174 项试验的系统评价。
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Oct;32(5):478-494. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2327127. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3
Massage for neck pain.
颈部疼痛按摩。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 28;2(2):CD004871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004871.pub5.