• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术界的团结及其与学术诚信的关系。

Solidarity in Academia and its Relationship to Academic Integrity.

作者信息

Bieliauskaitė Jolanta

机构信息

European Humanities University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

J Acad Ethics. 2021;19(3):309-322. doi: 10.1007/s10805-021-09420-6. Epub 2021 May 31.

DOI:10.1007/s10805-021-09420-6
PMID:34093099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8165131/
Abstract

This paper provides the theoretical analysis of forms of solidarity in academia and its relationship to academic integrity. This analysis is inspired by the drawn up by the International Association of Universities and the Magna Charta Observatory. These Guidelines refer to the principle of solidarity in the context of international cooperation between higher education institutions. However, the author of this paper believes that this principle might also be used in a broader academic context, in particular, in the field of academic ethics and academic integrity. Therefore, this paper aims at revealing the relevance of solidarity in academia and argues that the principle of solidarity can be considered as one of fundamental principles of academic ethics and should be reflected in the structure and provisions of the codes of academic ethics (conduct). For this purpose the author explores the philosophical and sociological approaches towards solidarity and defines the concept of academic solidarity, discusses the conceptual connection between academic solidarity, ethics and integrity and illustrates the impact of solidarity on the development of academic integrity. This analysis allows the author of the paper to recommend embedding the principle of solidarity in the codes of academic ethics of higher education institutions as well as extending the scope of its application by linking the rights and responsibilities of different groups within the academic community in a way that best expresses their unity, shared responsibility, mutual support in meeting the standards of social ethos.

摘要

本文对学术界团结的形式及其与学术诚信的关系进行了理论分析。这一分析受到国际大学协会和《大宪章》观察站起草的相关内容启发。这些指南提及了高等教育机构国际合作背景下的团结原则。然而,本文作者认为这一原则也可在更广泛的学术背景中使用,特别是在学术伦理和学术诚信领域。因此,本文旨在揭示团结在学术界的相关性,并认为团结原则可被视为学术伦理的基本原则之一,应体现在学术伦理(行为)准则的结构和条款中。为此,作者探究了关于团结的哲学和社会学方法,界定了学术团结的概念,讨论了学术团结、伦理与诚信之间的概念联系,并阐述了团结对学术诚信发展的影响。这一分析使本文作者能够建议将团结原则纳入高等教育机构的学术伦理准则,并通过以最佳方式表达学术共同体不同群体的团结、共同责任、相互支持以符合社会风气标准的方式,扩大其应用范围,将学术共同体不同群体的权利和责任联系起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba0/8165131/5bb32810fb94/10805_2021_9420_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba0/8165131/5bb32810fb94/10805_2021_9420_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba0/8165131/5bb32810fb94/10805_2021_9420_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Solidarity in Academia and its Relationship to Academic Integrity.学术界的团结及其与学术诚信的关系。
J Acad Ethics. 2021;19(3):309-322. doi: 10.1007/s10805-021-09420-6. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
Ethical principles for project collaboration between academic professionals or institutions and the biomedical industry.学术专业人员或机构与生物医学行业之间项目合作的伦理原则。
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:95-7. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S23033. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
3
Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007).第二届理论与产业研讨会会议录(2007年6月12日至14日,奥地利维也纳埃尔温·薛定谔研究所)
J Phys Condens Matter. 2008 Feb 13;20(6):060301. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/06/060301. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
4
European Universities' Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct.欧洲大学关于研究诚信与不当行为的指南。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Feb;12(1):33-44. doi: 10.1177/1556264616688980.
5
Integrity versus misconduct: learning the difference between right and wrong.正直与不当行为:了解是非之间的差异。
Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S67-71. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199309000-00037.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
A Principled Account of AMR Global Governance Solidarity, Subsidiarity, and Stewardship.从原则角度出发的 AMR 全球治理策略:团结、辅助以及管理。
Health Care Anal. 2023 Mar;31(1):58-63. doi: 10.1007/s10728-023-00456-w. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
8
Family solidarity and informal care: the case of care for people with dementia.家庭团结与非正规照护:以痴呆症患者照护为例。
Bioethics. 2012 Sep;26(7):361-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01992.x.
9
The integrity of science - lost in translation?科学的诚信——在翻译中丢失了吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;28(2):339-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
10
A code of ethics for the life sciences.生命科学伦理准则。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Mar;13(1):25-43. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0007-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Legal and ethical considerations around the use of existing illustrations to generate new illustrations in the anatomical sciences.解剖学领域中围绕使用现有插图生成新插图的法律和伦理考量。
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Mar;18(3):289-300. doi: 10.1002/ase.70002. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
"This Is What You Get When You Lead with the Arts": Making the Case for Social Wellness.“以艺术为先导会得到什么”:倡导社会健康。
J Med Humanit. 2024 Dec;45(4):449-463. doi: 10.1007/s10912-024-09895-5. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
European education corridors: opportunity for academic solidarity.欧洲教育走廊:学术团结的机遇。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1343. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30484-0.
2
Legal Origin and Social Solidarity: The Continued Relevance of Durkheim to Comparative Institutional Analysis.法律渊源与社会团结:涂尔干对比较制度分析的持续相关性
Sociology. 2017 Jun;51(3):646-665. doi: 10.1177/0038038515611049. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
3
Conversational flow promotes solidarity.会话流程促进团结。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e78363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078363. eCollection 2013.
4
Attitudes towards academic cheating during nursing studies.护理专业学习期间对学术作弊的态度。
Med Law. 2010 Dec;29(4):547-63.
5
Do undergraduates' motives for studying change as they progress through their degrees?本科生的学习动机是否会随着学位课程的推进而发生变化?
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Jun;77(Pt 2):379-95. doi: 10.1348/000709906X157772.