Douglass Tom, Calnan Michael
Department of Communication and Media, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom.
School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Policy, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Front Sociol. 2021 May 21;6:650997. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.650997. eCollection 2021.
In the context of current clinical practice guidance, this paper will analyse the role of GPs in decision-making about the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) using the concept of pharmaceuticalisation. Drawing on thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 GPs, the paper argues that the way GPs approach CVD pharmaceuticalisation is shaped by their understandings of and use of guidelines (and the knowledge they embody), existing treatment perspectives and the moral qualities of preventative treatment, and professional evaluations of 'relevant' information. The analysis indicates that there exist disparate and distinct approaches to and understandings of CVD pharmaceuticalisation amongst GPs. Depending on how knowledge, treatment perspectives and values variously combine, GPs sit somewhere on a spectrum of how pharmaceuticalised they are in terms of the approaches to and understandings of the prevention of CVD.
在当前临床实践指南的背景下,本文将运用药物化概念分析全科医生在心血管疾病(CVD)一级预防决策中的作用。通过对20名全科医生进行半结构化访谈的主题分析,本文认为全科医生对待CVD药物化的方式受到他们对指南的理解与运用(以及指南所体现的知识)、现有的治疗观念、预防性治疗的道德品质,以及对“相关”信息的专业评估的影响。分析表明,全科医生在CVD药物化的方法和理解上存在不同且独特的方式。根据知识、治疗观念和价值观的不同组合方式,全科医生在对待CVD预防的方法和理解上处于药物化程度的某个区间。