Rutledge Angela C, Johnston Anna, Bailey Dana, Booth Ronald A, Edmond Pamela, Leung Victor, Veljkovic Kika
Endocrinology and Immunology Scientific Committee, Institute for Quality Management in Healthcare, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada.
Pract Lab Med. 2021 Apr 23;25:e00229. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00229. eCollection 2021 May.
Testing for renin and aldosterone in clinical laboratories is complicated by pre-analytical considerations such as the posture for blood collection and susceptibility to cryoactivation of renin. From an analytical perspective, there are both renin activity and renin mass or concentration assays available. There can also be variability in result reporting practices and the aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR) cut-off applied to screen for primary aldosteronism (PA). The Institute for Quality Management in Healthcare (IQMH) Centre for Proficiency Testing surveyed laboratories on their handling of renin and aldosterone testing to better understand current practices.
An online survey was prepared and sent to 134 Canadian laboratories enrolled in endocrinology proficiency testing with IQMH.
One hundred twenty Ontario laboratories submitted responses. While only six (5%) laboratories perform testing for both renin and aldosterone, 108 (90%) collect and process specimens to be tested by reference laboratories. The survey revealed considerable variation in practices including the recommended state of patients prior to sample collection (for example, regarding medications or salt intake), the patient posture specifications for sample collection, the precautions taken against cryoactivation of renin, the choice of renin activity or mass assay, and the ARR cut-off used. The available literature on these factors was then reviewed.
Although there is no standardized procedure for specimen collection, analysis, or result reporting for renin or aldosterone testing, we have attempted to summarize the available literature to develop evidence-based recommendations. Where laboratory practice differs from peers and/or recommended protocols, laboratories should review their practices.
临床实验室中肾素和醛固酮的检测因分析前的注意事项而变得复杂,如采血姿势以及肾素对冷冻激活的敏感性。从分析角度来看,既有肾素活性检测,也有肾素质量或浓度检测方法。结果报告方法以及用于筛查原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)的醛固酮 - 肾素比值(ARR)临界值也可能存在差异。医疗质量管理研究所(IQMH)能力验证中心就肾素和醛固酮检测的处理情况对各实验室进行了调查,以更好地了解当前的做法。
编制了一份在线调查问卷,并发送给134家参加IQMH内分泌学能力验证的加拿大实验室。
120家安大略省的实验室提交了回复。虽然只有6家(5%)实验室同时进行肾素和醛固酮检测,但有108家(90%)收集并处理样本以供参考实验室检测。调查显示,在诸多做法上存在很大差异,包括样本采集前推荐的患者状态(例如,关于用药或盐摄入情况)、样本采集的患者姿势规范、预防肾素冷冻激活的措施、肾素活性或质量检测方法的选择以及所使用的ARR临界值。随后对有关这些因素的现有文献进行了综述。
尽管肾素或醛固酮检测的样本采集、分析或结果报告没有标准化程序,但我们试图总结现有文献以制定基于证据的建议。当实验室做法与同行和/或推荐方案不同时,实验室应审查其做法。