Procopio Gabrielle L, Jain Ruchi Patel, Tompkins Danielle M, Perez Javier Martin, Bicking Keri
Department of Pharmacy, Hackensack University Medical Center, 30 Prospect Ave, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Jan;53(1):158-166. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02491-7. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
In major/life-threatening bleeding, administration of timely and appropriate reversal agents is imperative to reduce morbidity and mortality. Due to complexities associated with the use of reversal agents, a clinical pharmacist-driven anticoagulation reversal program (ARP) was developed. The goal of this program was to ensure appropriateness of reversal agents based on the clinical scenario, optimize selection and avoid unintended consequences. This study describes the impact of a pharmacist-driven anticoagulation program on patient outcomes and cost. A single center retrospective chart review of adult patients whom the ARP was consulted from October 2018 to January 2020 was performed. Patients were included in the efficacy analysis if they were > 18 years of age and presented with acute bleeding. Patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis if the recommended reversal agent was not administered, if a repeat head CT was not available for patients who presented with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or if the patient was not bleeding. All patients were included in the economic evaluation. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved effective hemostasis within 24 h of anticoagulation reversal. Secondary outcomes include incidence of thromboembolic events, in-hospital mortality, and cost avoidance. One hundred twenty-one patients were evaluated by the ARP with 92 patients included in the efficacy analysis. The primary sites of bleeding were ICH in 46% and gastrointestinal (GI) in 29%. Hemostasis was achieved in 84% of patients. Thrombotic events occurred in 7.4% of patients and in-hospital mortality was 26.4%. Total cost avoidance was $1,005,871.78. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-driven ARP on clinical and economic outcomes. Implementation of a pharmacist-driven ARP was associated with favorable outcomes and cost savings.
在严重/危及生命的出血情况中,及时给予适当的逆转剂对于降低发病率和死亡率至关重要。由于使用逆转剂存在复杂性,因此制定了一项由临床药剂师主导的抗凝逆转计划(ARP)。该计划的目标是根据临床情况确保逆转剂的适当性,优化选择并避免意外后果。本研究描述了药剂师主导的抗凝计划对患者结局和成本的影响。对2018年10月至2020年1月期间咨询ARP的成年患者进行了单中心回顾性病历审查。如果患者年龄大于18岁且出现急性出血,则纳入疗效分析。如果未给予推荐的逆转剂、出现颅内出血(ICH)的患者没有重复头颅CT检查,或者患者没有出血,则排除在疗效分析之外。所有患者均纳入经济评估。主要结局是抗凝逆转后24小时内实现有效止血的患者百分比。次要结局包括血栓栓塞事件的发生率、住院死亡率和成本节约。ARP评估了121例患者,其中92例纳入疗效分析。出血的主要部位是ICH占46%,胃肠道(GI)占29%。84%的患者实现了止血。7.4%的患者发生了血栓事件,住院死亡率为26.4%。总成本节约为1,005,871.78美元。据我们所知,这是第一项评估药剂师主导的ARP对临床和经济结局影响的研究。实施药剂师主导的ARP与良好的结局和成本节约相关。