Department of Psychology and Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
LGBT Health. 2021 Jul;8(5):372-377. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2020.0449. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
This study assessed which sexual minority participants selected "Other" if their identity was absent. This was an online survey; 905 participants saw a limited set of sexual orientation options (bisexual, gay/lesbian, heterosexual, other), and later in the same survey, saw an expanded list. Twenty-one percent of participants chose different orientation labels across questions. When not presented with a "mostly heterosexual" option, 78% of mostly heterosexual participants chose "heterosexual"; 3% chose "other." However, when not presented with an "asexual" label, 100% of asexual participants chose "other." These findings suggest that "other" categories could misclassify a substantial proportion of sexual minority participants.
本研究评估了如果参与者的身份不存在,哪些性少数群体选择了“其他”。这是一项在线调查;905 名参与者看到了一组有限的性取向选择(双性恋、同性恋/女同性恋、异性恋、其他),之后在同一项调查中,他们看到了一个扩展的列表。21%的参与者在不同的问题中选择了不同的取向标签。当没有提供“主要异性恋”选项时,78%的主要异性恋参与者选择“异性恋”;3%选择“其他”。然而,当没有提供“无性恋”标签时,100%的无性恋参与者选择“其他”。这些发现表明,“其他”类别可能会错误分类相当一部分性少数群体参与者。