Suppr超能文献

依赖“其他”类别会导致对性少数群体参与者的重大错误分类。

Relying on an "Other" Category Leads to Significant Misclassification of Sexual Minority Participants.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

LGBT Health. 2021 Jul;8(5):372-377. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2020.0449. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

Abstract

This study assessed which sexual minority participants selected "Other" if their identity was absent. This was an online survey; 905 participants saw a limited set of sexual orientation options (bisexual, gay/lesbian, heterosexual, other), and later in the same survey, saw an expanded list. Twenty-one percent of participants chose different orientation labels across questions. When not presented with a "mostly heterosexual" option, 78% of mostly heterosexual participants chose "heterosexual"; 3% chose "other." However, when not presented with an "asexual" label, 100% of asexual participants chose "other." These findings suggest that "other" categories could misclassify a substantial proportion of sexual minority participants.

摘要

本研究评估了如果参与者的身份不存在,哪些性少数群体选择了“其他”。这是一项在线调查;905 名参与者看到了一组有限的性取向选择(双性恋、同性恋/女同性恋、异性恋、其他),之后在同一项调查中,他们看到了一个扩展的列表。21%的参与者在不同的问题中选择了不同的取向标签。当没有提供“主要异性恋”选项时,78%的主要异性恋参与者选择“异性恋”;3%选择“其他”。然而,当没有提供“无性恋”标签时,100%的无性恋参与者选择“其他”。这些发现表明,“其他”类别可能会错误分类相当一部分性少数群体参与者。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Applying the Female Sexual Functioning Index to sexual minority women.应用女性性功能指数于性少数女性。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Apr;21(4):401-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3072. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验