• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对照女性、孕妇及口服避孕药女性淋巴细胞中的姐妹染色单体交换:细胞培养温度的影响

Sister chromatid exchanges in the lymphocytes of control women, pregnant women, and women taking oral contraceptives: effects of cell culture temperature.

作者信息

Ghosh R, Ghosh P K

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi, India.

出版信息

Environ Mol Mutagen. 1988;12(2):179-83. doi: 10.1002/em.2860120204.

DOI:10.1002/em.2860120204
PMID:3409874
Abstract

The incidence of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) was investigated in the lymphocytes of control women, pregnant women, and women using oral contraceptives after culture at 37 degrees C and 40 degrees C. At 37 degrees C, the mean frequency of SCE (MEAN +/- S.E.) was found to be 7.91 +/- 0.30 in pregnant women and 8.53 +/- 0.29 in oral contraceptive users which were significantly higher than the SCE value of 5.56 +/- 0.21 found in control women. Increase in growth temperature to 40 degrees C elevated the SCE frequency to 11.86 +/- 0.44 in pregnant women, 12.76 +/- 0.46 in oral contraceptive users and 7.24 +/- 0.26 in control women. These data indicate that there is a differential induction of SCEs following increased cell culture temperature in the lymphocytes of pregnant women and oral contraceptive users, compared with control women.

摘要

在37摄氏度和40摄氏度培养后,对对照女性、孕妇和使用口服避孕药的女性的淋巴细胞中的姐妹染色单体交换(SCE)发生率进行了研究。在37摄氏度时,孕妇的SCE平均频率(均值±标准误)为7.91±0.30,口服避孕药使用者为8.53±0.29,均显著高于对照女性的SCE值5.56±0.21。将培养温度提高到40摄氏度后,孕妇的SCE频率升高到11.86±0.44,口服避孕药使用者为12.76±0.46,对照女性为7.24±0.26。这些数据表明,与对照女性相比,孕妇和口服避孕药使用者的淋巴细胞在细胞培养温度升高后,SCE的诱导存在差异。

相似文献

1
Sister chromatid exchanges in the lymphocytes of control women, pregnant women, and women taking oral contraceptives: effects of cell culture temperature.对照女性、孕妇及口服避孕药女性淋巴细胞中的姐妹染色单体交换:细胞培养温度的影响
Environ Mol Mutagen. 1988;12(2):179-83. doi: 10.1002/em.2860120204.
2
Effect of betel chewing on the frequency of sister chromatid exchanges in pregnant women and women using oral contraceptives.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1988 Jun;32(2):211-5. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(88)90283-x.
3
Sister-chromatid exchanges in oral contraceptive users.
Mutat Res. 1979 Oct;68(2):149-52. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(79)90142-3.
4
Normal sister-chromatid exchanges in oral contraceptive users.
Mutat Res. 1982 Feb;103(2):161-4. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(82)90023-9.
5
Assessment of DNA damage in women using oral contraceptives.使用口服避孕药的女性的DNA损伤评估。
Mutat Res. 2002 Nov 26;521(1-2):113-9. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(02)00217-6.
6
Further studies on sister-chromatid exchange frequency in users of hormonal contraceptives.
Mutat Res. 1983 Mar;119(3):351-4. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(83)90184-7.
7
Contraceptive steroid effects on nonreproductive organ systems.甾体避孕药对非生殖器官系统的影响。
J Reprod Med. 1986 Sep;31(9 Suppl):865-78.
8
Comparison of chromosome breakages in lymphocytes and fibroblasts from control women and women taking oral contraceptives.对照女性和服用口服避孕药女性的淋巴细胞和成纤维细胞中染色体断裂情况的比较。
Fertil Steril. 1975 Aug;26(8):828-32. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)41299-9.
9
Insulin receptors in circulating erythrocytes and monocytes from women on oral contraceptives or pregnant women near term.口服避孕药女性或足月孕妇循环红细胞和单核细胞中的胰岛素受体。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1980 Oct;51(4):711-7. doi: 10.1210/jcem-51-4-711.
10
[Sister chromatid exchanges in women taking oral contraceptive tablet norethindroni compositae for a long term].长期服用复方炔诺酮口服避孕药的女性的姐妹染色单体交换
Shengzhi Yu Biyun. 1982;2(4):42-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative activity of human carcinogens and NTP rodent carcinogens in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay: an integrative approach to genetic toxicity data assessment.人类致癌物与美国国家毒理学计划啮齿动物致癌物在小鼠骨髓微核试验中的比较活性:遗传毒性数据评估的综合方法
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Sep;102(9):758-62. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102758.