Suppr超能文献

理解 ICU 中抗生素处方决策:必要性关注框架的应用。

Understanding decisions about antibiotic prescribing in ICU: an application of the Necessity Concerns Framework.

机构信息

Centre for Behavioural Medicine, University College London, London, UK.

Centre for Behavioural Medicine, University College London, London, UK

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Mar;31(3):199-210. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012479. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics are extensively prescribed in intensive care units (ICUs), yet little is known about how antibiotic-related decisions are made in this setting. We explored how beliefs, perceptions and contextual factors influenced ICU clinicians' antibiotic prescribing.

METHODS

We conducted 4 focus groups and 34 semistructured interviews with clinicians involved in antibiotic prescribing in four English ICUs. Focus groups explored factors influencing prescribing, whereas interviews examined decision-making processes using two clinical vignettes. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, applying the Necessity Concerns Framework.

RESULTS

Clinicians' antibiotic decisions were influenced by their judgement of the necessity for prescribing/not prescribing, relative to their concerns about potential adverse consequences. Antibiotic necessity perceptions were strongly influenced by beliefs that antibiotics would protect patients from deterioration and themselves from the ethical and legal consequences of undertreatment. Clinicians also reported concerns about prescribing antibiotics. These generally centred on antimicrobial resistance; however, protecting the individual patient was prioritised over these societal concerns. Few participants identified antibiotic toxicity concerns as a key influencer. Clinical uncertainty often complicated balancing antibiotic necessity against concerns. Decisions to start or continue antibiotics often represented 'erring on the side of caution' as a protective response in uncertainty. This approach was reinforced by previous experiences of negative consequences ('being burnt') which motivated prescribing 'just in case' of an infection. Prescribing decisions were also context-dependent, exemplified by a lower perceived threshold to prescribe antibiotics out-of-hours, input from external team members and local prescribing norms.

CONCLUSION

Efforts to improve antibiotic stewardship should consider clinicians' desire to protect with a prescription. Rapid molecular microbiology, with appropriate communication, may diminish clinicians' fears of not prescribing or of using narrower-spectrum antibiotics.

摘要

背景

抗生素在重症监护病房(ICU)中广泛应用,但对于在这种环境下如何做出与抗生素相关的决策知之甚少。我们探讨了信念、观念和环境因素如何影响 ICU 临床医生的抗生素处方。

方法

我们在英格兰的四家 ICU 中进行了 4 个焦点小组和 34 次半结构化访谈,参与者是参与抗生素处方的临床医生。焦点小组探讨了影响处方的因素,而访谈则使用两个临床案例研究来考察决策过程。采用主题分析方法,应用必要性关注框架对数据进行分析。

结果

临床医生的抗生素决策受到他们判断是否需要处方/不处方的影响,这与他们对潜在不良后果的关注有关。抗生素必要性的看法受到这样的信念强烈影响,即抗生素可以保护患者免受恶化,也可以保护自己免受治疗不足的道德和法律后果。临床医生还报告了对抗生素处方的担忧。这些担忧通常集中在抗生素耐药性上;然而,保护个体患者优先于这些社会关注。很少有参与者认为抗生素毒性问题是一个关键影响因素。临床不确定性经常使平衡抗生素必要性与担忧变得复杂。开始或继续使用抗生素的决定通常代表着在不确定性中“谨慎行事”的保护性反应。这种方法受到以前经历过负面后果(“被烧伤”)的影响,这些经历促使他们“以防万一”地开出抗生素。决策还取决于具体情况,例如,在非工作时间,医生认为开抗生素的门槛较低,来自外部团队成员的输入以及当地的处方规范。

结论

为改善抗生素管理,应考虑到临床医生希望通过处方来保护患者。快速的分子微生物学,以及适当的沟通,可以减轻临床医生对抗生素治疗不足或使用窄谱抗生素的恐惧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b04/8899486/3edae3a1af74/bmjqs-2020-012479f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验