• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶棘韧带固定术中用于阴道网片固定的可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线:一项随机对照试验

Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Reisenauer Christl, Andress Jürgen, Schoenfisch Birgitt, Huebner Markus, Brucker Sara Yvonne, Lippkowski Andrea, Beilecke Kathrin, Marschke Juliane, Tunn Ralf

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.

Women's Center Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 117, 3001, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):411-419. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04853-4. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-021-04853-4
PMID:34100975
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of the study was to analyze anatomical and functional outcomes after sacrocolpopexy (SCP) for vaginal vault prolapse pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) II-III by random use of absorbable (Vicryl) and non-absorbable sutures (Ethibond) for vaginal mesh fixation.

METHODS

This study was designed as a two-center randomized controlled study (RCT). The primary objective was to evaluate the anatomical outcome. Success was defined when the vaginal apex (point C; POPQ) did not descend more than 50% of the total vaginal length (tvl) during Valsalva. Patients completed a pelvic examination incorporating the POPQ and questionnaires (the German pelvic floor questionnaire and the PISQ-12 questionnaire) at baseline and 6 months postsurgery. Perioperative adverse events (AE) were recorded. Sample size calculations, based on a 10% non-inferiority limit required 100 participants per group, with power = 90%.

RESULTS

In 190 out of 195 women (ETH group n = 96; VIC group n = 94) anatomical success was achieved. The relative risk of anatomical success failure in the VIC group versus the ETH group was 0.69, with a 95% confidence interval 0.12-4.02. The change in the symptom scores did not differ significantly between the ETH and the VIC group. In the ETH group, three suture penetrations into the vagina were observed, and none in the VIC group 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical success after SCP for vaginal vault prolapse POPQ II-III is not affected by suture type for vaginal monofilament mesh attachment. Moreover, we did not see any differences in functional outcomes between the two groups. Three suture penetrations into the vagina were observed in the ETH group, and none in the VIC group 6 months postoperatively.

摘要

引言与假设

本研究的目的是分析通过随机使用可吸收缝线(薇乔)和不可吸收缝线(爱惜邦)固定阴道网片,对盆腔器官脱垂定量分期(POPQ)为II - III期的阴道穹隆脱垂进行骶骨阴道固定术后的解剖学和功能学结果。

方法

本研究设计为一项双中心随机对照试验(RCT)。主要目标是评估解剖学结果。当在用力屏气时阴道顶端(C点;POPQ)下降不超过阴道总长度(tvl)的50%时,定义为成功。患者在基线和术后6个月完成包含POPQ的盆腔检查以及问卷调查(德国盆底问卷和PISQ - 12问卷)。记录围手术期不良事件(AE)。基于10%的非劣效性界限进行样本量计算,每组需要100名参与者,检验效能为90%。

结果

195名女性中的190名(ETH组n = 96;VIC组n = 94)获得了解剖学成功。VIC组与ETH组解剖学成功失败的相对风险为0.69,95%置信区间为0.12 - 4.02。ETH组和VIC组症状评分的变化无显著差异。在ETH组,术后6个月观察到3例缝线穿透阴道,而VIC组未观察到。

结论

对于POPQ II - III期的阴道穹隆脱垂,骶骨阴道固定术后的解剖学成功不受阴道单丝网片固定缝线类型的影响。此外,我们未观察到两组在功能学结果上有任何差异。术后6个月,ETH组观察到3例缝线穿透阴道,而VIC组未观察到。

相似文献

1
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.骶棘韧带固定术中用于阴道网片固定的可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线:一项随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):411-419. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04853-4. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
2
Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.在机器人辅助经阴道骶骨阴道固定术中,网片固定采用锚钉与缝线的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):258.e1-258.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 13.
3
Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture for Vaginal Mesh Fixation During Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.永久性缝线与可吸收缝线在全子宫切除和骶骨阴道固定术中固定阴道网片的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;136(2):355-364. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003884.
4
RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.阴道腹膜外子宫骶韧带悬吊术(VEULS)联合前路补片与骶骨阴道固定术的随机对照试验:4年随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov;29(11):1607-1614. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3687-2. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
5
Comparison of absorbable and permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy: A randomized controlled trial.可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线在腹腔镜骶骨宫颈固定术中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Feb;100(2):347-352. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13997. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomised controlled trial and prospective cohort (SALTO-2 trial).腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与阴道骶棘韧带固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂的随机对照试验和前瞻性队列研究(SALTO-2 试验)。
BJOG. 2023 Nov;130(12):1542-1551. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17525. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术的网片相关并发症
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1475-1481. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03952-7. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
8
At the Scrub Sink: Permanent Versus Absorbable Sutures for Sacrocolpopexy Vaginal Mesh Fixation.在洗手盆处:经阴道骶骨固定的永久性缝线与可吸收缝线对比。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Sep 1;30(9):733-735. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001569. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
9
Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.有子宫和无子宫的盆腔器官脱垂手术复发高风险患者术后1年的解剖学结局:一项比较腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术/宫颈固定术与阴道前路网状物的随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):545-555. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3702-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
10
A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.一项关于微创骶骨阴道固定术中阴道网片附着技术的随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May;26(5):649-56. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2566-8. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Sacrocolpopexy Mesh Complications-A Narrative Review and Clinical Experience from a Large-Volume Center.骶骨阴道固定术网片并发症的管理——来自一个大容量中心的叙述性综述和临床经验
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Feb;36(2):231-241. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05955-5. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Post-operative outcomes associated with anterior mesh location after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术后前网片位置与术后结果的相关性。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;310(5):2717-2724. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07719-4. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
At the Scrub Sink: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolopexy.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of absorbable and permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy: A randomized controlled trial.可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线在腹腔镜骶骨宫颈固定术中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Feb;100(2):347-352. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13997. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
2
Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture for Vaginal Mesh Fixation During Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.永久性缝线与可吸收缝线在全子宫切除和骶骨阴道固定术中固定阴道网片的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;136(2):355-364. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003884.
3
Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications.
在刷手池旁:微创骶骨固定术。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Apr 1;30(4):403-405. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001496. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
4
Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.阴道顶端脱垂妇女的手术治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 26;7(7):CD012376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012376.pub2.
5
Comparative study of absorbable suture and permanent suture in sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.骶骨阴道固定术中可吸收缝线与永久性缝线的比较研究:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 May;34(5):993-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05427-8. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
6
Letter to the editor: absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.致编辑的信:骶棘韧带固定术中用于阴道网片固定的可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线:一项随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):2069. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05247-w. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse in a patient affected by marfan syndrome: a case report.腹腔镜骶骨子宫固定术治疗马凡综合征患者盆腔器官脱垂:一例报告
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Dec;13(4):399-403. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.4.043.
微创骶骨阴道固定术:如何避免短期和长期并发症
Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Nov;17(11):81. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0638-7.
4
A pilot study comparing anatomic failure after sacrocolpopexy with absorbable or permanent sutures for vaginal mesh attachment.一项比较使用可吸收或永久性缝线固定阴道网片的骶骨阴道固定术后解剖学失败情况的试点研究。
Perm J. 2014 Fall;18(4):40-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-022.
5
Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and anatomy and function of the posterior compartment.腹骶阴道固定术及后盆腔的解剖与功能
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;97(5 Pt 1):678-84. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01205-9.
6
"Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials.在临床试验中“证明原假设”
Control Clin Trials. 1982 Dec;3(4):345-53. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1.