Suppr超能文献

区域实施电子概要内镜报告后重复术前内镜检查:一项回顾性比较研究

Repeat preoperative endoscopy after regional implementation of electronic synoptic endoscopy reporting: a retrospective comparative study.

作者信息

Johnson Garrett G R J, Singh Harminder, Vergis Ashley, Park Jason, Hershorn Olivia, Hochman David, Helewa Ramzi M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Clinician Investigator Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):2886-2895. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08580-1. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Repeat preoperative endoscopy is common for patients with colorectal neoplasms. This can result in treatment delays, patient discomfort, and risks of colonoscopy-related complications. Repeat preoperative endoscopy has been attributed to poor communication between endoscopists and surgeons. In January 2019, mandatory electronic synoptic reporting for endoscopy was implemented to include elements consistent with quality indicators proposed in national guidelines. The aim of the present study is to assess whether the repeat preoperative endoscopy rate for colorectal lesions changed following synoptic report implementation.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 1690 consecutive patients who underwent elective surgical resection for colorectal neoplasms from January 2007 to June 2020 at a tertiary hospital in Canada. Patients who had an index endoscopy documented via synoptic report were compared to those reported via narrative report. Primary outcomes were rates of repeat preoperative endoscopy and inclusion of colonoscopy quality indicators: photo-documentation, tattoo placement, and bowel preparation score.

RESULTS

In total, 1429 patients who underwent elective colorectal resection for colorectal cancers or polyps between January 2007 and June 2020 were included. 115 had index endoscopies recorded via synoptic report and 1314 by narrative report. The repeat preoperative endoscopy rate after endoscopies documented by narrative report was 29.07% (95% CI 26.63-31.61) and 25.22% (95% CI 17.58-34.17%) for synoptic report. Patients whose index endoscopies where performed by a practitioner other than their operating surgeon had a re-endoscopy rate of 36.03% (95% CI 32.82-39.33%) after narrative report and 38.81% (95% CI 27.14-51.50%) for synoptic report. Rates of tattoo placement, photo-documentation, and reporting of bowel preparation quality were all significantly increased with synoptic reports (p ≤ 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopy synoptic reports based on current guidelines were not associated with a decrease in rates of repeat pre-operative endoscopy at a high-volume colorectal cancer centre. Future study should examine guideline deficiencies for this purpose and make necessary modifications.

摘要

背景

结直肠肿瘤患者术前重复进行内镜检查很常见。这可能导致治疗延迟、患者不适以及结肠镜检查相关并发症的风险。术前重复进行内镜检查被认为是内镜医师和外科医生之间沟通不畅所致。2019年1月,实施了强制性内镜检查电子概要报告,纳入了与国家指南中提出的质量指标一致的要素。本研究的目的是评估实施概要报告后,结直肠病变的术前重复内镜检查率是否发生了变化。

方法

对2007年1月至2020年6月在加拿大一家三级医院接受择期结直肠肿瘤手术切除的1690例连续患者进行回顾性研究。将通过概要报告记录索引内镜检查的患者与通过叙述性报告记录的患者进行比较。主要结局指标为术前重复内镜检查率以及结肠镜检查质量指标的纳入情况:照片记录、纹身标记和肠道准备评分。

结果

总共纳入了2007年1月至2020年6月期间因结直肠癌或息肉接受择期结直肠切除术的1429例患者。115例患者的索引内镜检查通过概要报告记录,1314例通过叙述性报告记录。叙述性报告记录的内镜检查后术前重复内镜检查率为29.07%(95%可信区间26.63 - 31.61),概要报告记录的为25.22%(95%可信区间17.58 - 34.17%)。索引内镜检查由其手术医生以外的从业者进行的患者,叙述性报告记录后的再次内镜检查率为36.03%(95%可信区间32.82 - 39.33%),概要报告记录的为38.81%(95%可信区间27.14 - 51.50%)。概要报告记录的纹身标记、照片记录和肠道准备质量报告率均显著提高(p≤0.003)。

结论

在一家大型结直肠癌中心,基于当前指南的内镜检查概要报告与术前重复内镜检查率的降低无关。未来的研究应检查该指南在此方面的不足之处并进行必要修改。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验