Suppr超能文献

一线纳武利尤单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗治疗晚期胃癌、胃食管交界癌和食管腺癌(CheckMate 649):一项随机、开放标签的3期试验。

First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

作者信息

Janjigian Yelena Y, Shitara Kohei, Moehler Markus, Garrido Marcelo, Salman Pamela, Shen Lin, Wyrwicz Lucjan, Yamaguchi Kensei, Skoczylas Tomasz, Campos Bragagnoli Arinilda, Liu Tianshu, Schenker Michael, Yanez Patricio, Tehfe Mustapha, Kowalyszyn Ruben, Karamouzis Michalis V, Bruges Ricardo, Zander Thomas, Pazo-Cid Roberto, Hitre Erika, Feeney Kynan, Cleary James M, Poulart Valerie, Cullen Dana, Lei Ming, Xiao Hong, Kondo Kaoru, Li Mingshun, Ajani Jaffer A

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

出版信息

Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):27-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00797-2. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

First-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma has a median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year. We aimed to evaluate first-line programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitor-based therapies in gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report the first results for nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 649), we enrolled adults (≥18 years) with previously untreated, unresectable, non-HER2-positive gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, or oesophageal adenocarcinoma, regardless of PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression from 175 hospitals and cancer centres in 29 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1 while all three groups were open) via interactive web response technology (block sizes of six) to nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks or 240 mg every 2 weeks) plus chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin every 3 weeks or leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin every 2 weeks), nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or chemotherapy alone. Primary endpoints for nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone were OS or progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review, in patients whose tumours had a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of five or more. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02872116.

FINDINGS

From March 27, 2017, to April 24, 2019, of 2687 patients assessed for eligibility, we concurrently randomly assigned 1581 patients to treatment (nivolumab plus chemotherapy [n=789, 50%] or chemotherapy alone [n=792, 50%]). The median follow-up for OS was 13·1 months (IQR 6·7-19·1) for nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 11·1 months (5·8-16·1) for chemotherapy alone. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in significant improvements in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [98·4% CI 0·59-0·86]; p<0·0001) and PFS (HR 0·68 [98 % CI 0·56-0·81]; p<0·0001) versus chemotherapy alone in patients with a PD-L1 CPS of five or more (minimum follow-up 12·1 months). Additional results showed significant improvement in OS, along with PFS benefit, in patients with a PD-L1 CPS of one or more and all randomly assigned patients. Among all treated patients, 462 (59%) of 782 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 341 (44%) of 767 patients in the chemotherapy alone group had grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events. The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (≥25%) were nausea, diarrhoea, and peripheral neuropathy across both groups. 16 (2%) deaths in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and four (1%) deaths in the chemotherapy alone group were considered to be treatment-related. No new safety signals were identified.

INTERPRETATION

Nivolumab is the first PD-1 inhibitor to show superior OS, along with PFS benefit and an acceptable safety profile, in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, or oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy represents a new standard first-line treatment for these patients.

FUNDING

Bristol Myers Squibb, in collaboration with Ono Pharmaceutical.

摘要

背景

晚期或转移性人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性胃或胃食管交界腺癌的一线化疗的总生存期(OS)中位数少于1年。我们旨在评估以程序性细胞死亡(PD)-1抑制剂为基础的一线治疗方案在胃癌、胃食管交界癌和食管腺癌中的疗效。我们报告了纳武利尤单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗对比的首个结果。

方法

在这项多中心、随机、开放标签的3期试验(CheckMate 649)中,我们纳入了来自29个国家的175家医院和癌症中心的成年患者(≥18岁),这些患者患有先前未接受过治疗、无法切除的非HER2阳性胃癌、胃食管交界癌或食管腺癌,无论其程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达情况如何。患者通过交互式网络响应技术(每组六个区组)随机分配(1:1:1,三组均为开放组)接受纳武利尤单抗(每3周360 mg或每2周240 mg)联合化疗(每3周卡培他滨和奥沙利铂或每2周亚叶酸、氟尿嘧啶和奥沙利铂)、纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗或单纯化疗。纳武利尤单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗对比的主要终点是由盲态独立中央审查评估的OS或无进展生存期(PFS),这些患者的肿瘤程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)综合阳性评分(CPS)为5或更高。在所有接受至少一剂指定治疗的患者中评估安全性。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT02872116。

结果

从2017年3月27日至2019年4月24日,在2687例评估符合资格的患者中,我们同时将1581例患者随机分配接受治疗(纳武利尤单抗联合化疗[n = 789,50%]或单纯化疗[n = 792,50%])。纳武利尤单抗联合化疗组OS的中位随访时间为13.1个月(IQR 6.7 - 19.1),单纯化疗组为11.1个月(5.8 - 16.1)。在PD-L1 CPS为5或更高的患者中(最短随访12.1个月),与单纯化疗相比,纳武利尤单抗联合化疗显著改善了OS(风险比[HR] 0.71 [98.4% CI 0.59 - 0.86];p < 0.0001)和PFS(HR 0.68 [98% CI 0.56 - 0.81];p < 0.0001)。其他结果显示,在PD-L1 CPS为1或更高的患者以及所有随机分配的患者中,OS显著改善,同时PFS也有获益。在所有接受治疗的患者中,纳武利尤单抗联合化疗组782例患者中有462例(59%)发生3 - 4级治疗相关不良事件,单纯化疗组767例患者中有341例(44%)发生。两组中最常见的任何级别治疗相关不良事件(≥25%)为恶心、腹泻和周围神经病变。纳武利尤单抗联合化疗组有16例(2%)死亡,单纯化疗组有4例(1%)死亡被认为与治疗相关。未发现新的安全信号。

解读

在先前未接受过治疗的晚期胃癌、胃食管交界癌或食管腺癌患者中,纳武利尤单抗是首个与单纯化疗相比,联合化疗显示出更优的OS、PFS获益且安全性可接受的PD-1抑制剂。纳武利尤单抗联合化疗代表了这些患者新的一线标准治疗方案。

资助

百时美施贵宝与小野制药合作提供。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
5
The impact of aberrant lipid metabolism on the immune microenvironment of gastric cancer: a mini review.
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 18;16:1639823. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1639823. eCollection 2025.
8
Cancer Immunotherapy in Combination with Radiotherapy and/or Chemotherapy: Mechanisms and Clinical Therapy.
MedComm (2020). 2025 Aug 31;6(9):e70346. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70346. eCollection 2025 Sep.
9
Comparison of the efficacy of mFOLFOX-6 and mDCF regimens in the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Aug 30;17:17588359251368069. doi: 10.1177/17588359251368069. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

2
Inter-tumor heterogeneity of PD-L1 status: is it important in clinical decision making?
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):1770-1775. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1661.
3
Multicentre biomarker cohort study on the efficacy of nivolumab treatment for gastric cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2020 Sep;123(6):965-972. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0975-7. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
4
Global burden of oesophageal and gastric cancer by histology and subsite in 2018.
Gut. 2020 Sep;69(9):1564-1571. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321600. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
5
Heterogeneous programmed death-ligand 1 expression in gastric cancer: comparison of tissue microarrays and whole sections.
Cancer Cell Int. 2020 May 24;20:186. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01273-0. eCollection 2020.
6
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition).
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
7
PD-L1 expression in gastroesophageal dysplastic lesions.
Virchows Arch. 2020 Jul;477(1):151-156. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02693-8. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Cisplatin and oxaliplatin induce similar immunogenic changes in preclinical models of head and neck cancer.
Oral Oncol. 2019 Aug;95:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验