Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Drug Development Unit, Sarah Cannon Research Institute UK, London, UK; Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Aug;20(8):1109-1123. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30458-9. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
Pre-clinical and clinical evidence suggests that simultaneous blockade of VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and PD-1 or PD-L1 enhances antigen-specific T-cell migration, antitumour activity, and has favourable toxicity. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety and preliminary antitumour activity of ramucirumab (an IgG1 VEGFR-2 antagonist) combined with pembrolizumab (an IgG4 PD-1 antagonist) in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, or urothelial carcinoma.
We did a multicohort, non-randomised, open-label, phase 1a/b trial at 16 academic medical centres, hospitals, and clinics in the USA, France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. We enrolled adult patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (cohorts A and B), non-small-cell lung cancer (cohort C), or urothelial carcinoma (cohort D), whose disease had progressed on one or two lines of previous therapy (for those with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma) or one to three lines of previous therapy (for those with non-small-cell lung cancer and urothelial carcinoma) that included platinum (for all tumour types) or fluoropyrimidine or both (for gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma). Eligibility criteria included presence of measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients with previously untreated gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and non-small-cell lung cancer were also enrolled (in two additional separate cohorts); the results for these cohorts will be reported separately. The first 21-day treatment cycle was a dose-limiting toxicity observation period (phase 1a; safety run-in), followed by a phase 1b cohort expansion stage. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously on day 1, and intravenous ramucirumab was administered at 8 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 for cohort A or at 10 mg/kg on day 1 for cohorts B, C, and D, every 3 weeks, until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of ramucirumab in combination with pembrolizumab assessed by the incidence of adverse events in both phase 1a and 1b and as dose-limiting toxicities during phase 1a. The safety and activity analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02443324, and is no longer enrolling patients.
Between July 30, 2015 and June 24, 2016, we enrolled and treated 92 patients (41 with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, 27 with non-small-cell lung cancer, and 24 with urothelial carcinoma). Median follow-up was 32·8 months (IQR 28·1-33·6). During the first cycle of treatment (phase 1a safety run-in; n=11), one patient with gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received the 8 mg/kg dose of ramucirumab had grade 3 abdominal pain, colitis, hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, and jaundice, and grade 4 cholestasis, and died on treatment on day 40; the death was deemed related to progressive disease. No additional dose-limiting toxicities occurred and the decision was made to maintain the full planned doses of ramucirumab and pembrolizumab in phase 1b (n=81). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 75 (82%) of 92 patients, the most common of which was fatigue (in 33 patients [36%]), predominantly of grade 1 or 2 severity. 22 patients (24%) had one or more treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse, most commonly hypertension (six patients; 7%) and colitis (five patients; 5%). Serious adverse events occurred in 53 (58%) of 92 patients, and were deemed related to treatment in 22 (24%) patients. The most common treatment-related serious adverse events were abdominal pain in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (in three [7%] of 41 patients); asthenia and myocardial infarction in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (two [7%] of 27 patients), and colitis in patients with urothelial carcinoma (two [8%] of 24 patients). Six (7%) of 92 patients discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events, and one death (from pulmonary sepsis in a patient with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma) was deemed related to treatment. The number of patients achieving an objective response was three (7%; 95% CI 1·5-19·9) of 41 in the gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma cohort, eight (30%; 13·8-50·2) of 27 in the non-small-cell lung cancer cohort, and three (13%, 2·7-32·4) in the urothelial carcinoma cohort.
Ramucirumab in combination with pembrolizumab showed a manageable safety profile with favourable antitumour activity in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Our results contribute to the growing evidence that supports dual inhibition of the VEGF-VEGFR2 and PD-1-PD-L1 pathways. This combination could be further explored with or without chemotherapy, especially for patients with tumours for which single-agent checkpoint inhibitors have shown no additional benefit over chemotherapy.
Eli Lilly and Company, and Merck and Co.
临床前和临床证据表明,同时阻断血管内皮生长因子受体-2(VEGFR-2)和 PD-1 或 PD-L1 可增强抗原特异性 T 细胞迁移、抗肿瘤活性,并具有良好的毒性。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估雷莫芦单抗(一种 IgG1VEGFR-2 拮抗剂)联合帕博利珠单抗(一种 IgG4PD-1 拮抗剂)在先前接受治疗的晚期胃或胃食管交界处腺癌、非小细胞肺癌或尿路上皮癌患者中的安全性和初步抗肿瘤活性。
我们在 16 个美国、法国、德国、西班牙和英国的学术医疗中心、医院和诊所进行了一项多队列、非随机、开放性、1a/1b 期试验。我们招募了年龄在 18 岁或以上的组织学证实的胃或胃食管交界处腺癌(队列 A 和 B)、非小细胞肺癌(队列 C)或尿路上皮癌(队列 D)的成年患者,这些患者的疾病在先前的治疗中进展了一次或两次(对于胃或胃食管交界处腺癌)或一次到三次(对于非小细胞肺癌和尿路上皮癌),包括铂(用于所有肿瘤类型)或氟嘧啶或两者(用于胃或胃食管交界处腺癌)。纳入标准包括存在可测量的疾病和东部肿瘤协作组表现状态 0-1。也招募了未经治疗的胃或胃食管交界处腺癌和非小细胞肺癌患者(在另外两个单独的队列中);这些队列的结果将单独报告。第一个 21 天治疗周期是一个剂量限制毒性观察期(1a 期;安全运行),随后是一个 1b 期队列扩展阶段。第 1 天静脉注射 200mg 帕博利珠单抗,第 1 天和第 8 天静脉注射 8mg/kg 的雷莫芦单抗(用于队列 A)或第 1 天静脉注射 10mg/kg 的雷莫芦单抗(用于队列 B、C 和 D),每 3 周一次,直至疾病进展或其他停药标准。主要终点是评估雷莫芦单抗联合帕博利珠单抗的安全性和耐受性,通过 1a 和 1b 期的不良事件发生率和 1a 期的剂量限制毒性来评估。安全性和活性分析集包括至少接受一剂研究治疗的所有患者。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02443324,目前不再招募患者。
2015 年 7 月 30 日至 2016 年 6 月 24 日,我们共招募并治疗了 92 名患者(41 名胃或胃食管交界处腺癌患者,27 名非小细胞肺癌患者,24 名尿路上皮癌患者)。中位随访时间为 32.8 个月(IQR 28.1-33.6)。在第一个治疗周期(1a 期安全运行)中,一名接受 8mg/kg 雷莫芦单抗的胃食管交界处腺癌患者出现 3 级腹痛、结肠炎、肝炎、间质性肺病和黄疸,以及 4 级胆汁淤积,并在第 40 天因疾病进展而死亡;死亡被认为与疾病进展有关。没有发生其他剂量限制毒性,因此决定在 1b 期维持雷莫芦单抗和帕博利珠单抗的全计划剂量(n=81)。92 名患者中有 75 名(82%)发生与治疗相关的不良事件,最常见的是疲劳(33 名患者[36%]),主要为 1 级或 2 级严重程度。22 名(24%)患者发生 1 或更多与治疗相关的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件,最常见的是高血压(6 名患者[7%])和结肠炎(5 名患者[5%])。92 名患者中有 53 名(58%)发生严重不良事件,其中 22 名(24%)被认为与治疗有关。最常见的与治疗相关的严重不良事件是胃或胃食管交界处腺癌患者的腹痛(41 名患者中有 3 名[7%]);非小细胞肺癌患者的乏力和心肌梗死(27 名患者中有 2 名[7%]),以及尿路上皮癌患者的结肠炎(24 名患者中有 2 名[8%])。6 名(7%)患者因与治疗相关的不良事件而停止治疗,1 名死亡(胃或胃食管交界处腺癌患者因肺部败血症)被认为与治疗有关。胃或胃食管交界处腺癌队列中客观缓解的患者人数为 3 名(7%;95%CI 1.5-19.9),非小细胞肺癌队列中为 8 名(30%;13.8-50.2),尿路上皮癌队列中为 3 名(13%;2.7-32.4)。
雷莫芦单抗联合帕博利珠单抗在先前接受治疗的晚期胃或胃食管交界处腺癌、非小细胞肺癌和尿路上皮癌患者中表现出可管理的安全性和良好的抗肿瘤活性。我们的结果为支持 VEGF-VEGFR2 和 PD-1-PD-L1 通路的双重抑制提供了更多证据。这种联合治疗可以进一步探索,包括与化疗联合或不联合化疗,特别是对于单药检查点抑制剂对化疗没有额外益处的肿瘤患者。
礼来公司和默克公司。