Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China; Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, Peking University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;177:108904. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108904. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
To inform clinical practice by comparing and ranking the lowing blood glucose and weight-loss abilities of 8 glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from database inception to April 13, 2021. The outcomes were Δ HbA, Δ weight, adverse events [AE] withdrawals, and incidence of hypoglycemia. We estimated standardized mean differences [SMD] and summary odds ratios (ORs) using frequentist network meta-analysis with random effects.
Retrieved trials included 11,126 patients, the overall mean age was 56.7 ± 10.36 years old. In terms of efficacy, all GLP-1RAs were more effective than the placebo except albiglutide-30 mg QW (Δ weight: SMD -0.26 kg [95 %CI: -1.10, 0.59 kg). When it came to safety, oral semaglutide-14mgQD, semaglutide-1mgQW, Liraglutide-1.8mgQD, and Exenatide-2ugBID were associated with an increased risk of AE withdrawals. And GLP-1RAs were associated with a higher incidence of hypoglycemia than placebo except albiglutide-30mgQW and orally administered semaglutide-14mgQD.
Overall GLP-1RAs were more efficacious than placebo in patients with T2D on efficacy. Unfortunately, differences between GLP1-RAs regarding safety were mostly not significant. We may realize the individualized GLP-1RAs administration based on blood glucose level and obesity degree.
通过比较和评估 8 种胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)在 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中的降血糖和减重能力,为临床实践提供信息。
我们检索了从数据库建立到 2021 年 4 月 13 日的 PubMed、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 数据库。结局指标为ΔHbA1c、Δ体重、不良事件(AE)退出率和低血糖发生率。我们使用具有随机效应的频率网络荟萃分析来估计标准化均数差(SMD)和汇总比值比(OR)。
纳入的试验共包括 11126 例患者,总体平均年龄为 56.7±10.36 岁。在疗效方面,除了阿必鲁肽 30mg 每周一次(QW)(Δ体重:SMD-0.26kg[95%CI:-1.10,0.59kg])外,所有 GLP-1RAs 均优于安慰剂。在安全性方面,口服司美格鲁肽 14mg 每日一次(QD)、司美格鲁肽 1mg QW、利拉鲁肽 1.8mg QD 和艾塞那肽 2μg 每日两次(BID)与 AE 退出风险增加相关。GLP-1RAs 与安慰剂相比,低血糖发生率更高,除了阿必鲁肽 30mg QW 和口服司美格鲁肽 14mg QD 外。
总体而言,GLP-1RAs 在 T2D 患者中的疗效优于安慰剂。不幸的是,GLP1-RAs 之间关于安全性的差异大多没有统计学意义。我们可能可以根据血糖水平和肥胖程度实现个体化的 GLP-1RA 管理。