Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):6973-6980. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1932807. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
To determine the relationship between maternal age and labor induction duration among nulliparous women.
This retrospective cohort study included nulliparous women with non-anomalous, term, singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction with intact membranes at a tertiary-care academic hospital from January 2015 to April 2017. Maternal age was stratified as follows: <25 years, 25-29 years, 30-34 years, 35-39 years, and ≥ 40 years. The primary outcome was induction duration, defined as the time the first induction agent was administered to time of birth. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery, cesarean indication, hemorrhage, blood transfusion, peripartum infection, composite neonatal morbidity, and induction duration among the subset of women who ultimately underwent cesarean. The data were analyzed using chi-squared and Fisher exact tests. Multivariable regression was used to adjust for maternal race/ethnicity, maternal body mass index, gestational age at start of induction, and induction indication. Hazard ratios were used to calculate induction duration among women who underwent cesarean delivery, stratified by age and adjusted by the same variables.
Among the 955 patients included, the median induction duration was 32.3 h (interquartile range (IQR) 20.4-41.0 h). Women 40 years and older had a slight increase in induction duration (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.05) and a seven-fold increased risk of induction lasting 60 h or longer (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 7.3, CI 1.8-29.9) when compared to those under 25 years of age; otherwise, there was no association between maternal age and labor induction duration. There was no association between age and cesarean delivery, cesarean indication, hemorrhage, transfusion, peripartum infection, or adverse neonatal outcomes. Furthermore, there was no association between maternal age and induction duration even among women who ultimately underwent cesarean.
We found no association between maternal age and induction duration for women under 40 years of age. For women 40 years of age and older, these was an increased risk of labor induction lasting 60 h or longer. Despite this, we found no association between maternal age and cesarean delivery or other adverse maternal or fetal outcomes.
确定初产妇的年龄与引产持续时间之间的关系。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 4 月在一家三级学术医院接受单胎足月、无异常胎膜完整引产的初产妇。将产妇年龄分为以下几类:<25 岁、25-29 岁、30-34 岁、35-39 岁和≥40 岁。主要结局是引产持续时间,定义为首次使用引产药物至分娩的时间。次要结局为剖宫产、剖宫产指征、出血、输血、围产期感染、复合新生儿发病率和最终行剖宫产产妇的引产持续时间。采用卡方检验和 Fisher 确切概率法进行数据分析。多变量回归用于调整产妇种族/民族、产妇体重指数、引产开始时的孕周和引产指征。采用风险比计算行剖宫产产妇的引产持续时间,并按年龄分层,同时调整上述变量。
在纳入的 955 例患者中,中位引产持续时间为 32.3 小时(四分位间距(IQR)20.4-41.0 小时)。40 岁及以上的产妇引产持续时间略有增加(调整后的优势比(aOR)1.03,95%置信区间(CI)1.01-1.05),且引产持续时间达 60 小时或更长的风险增加 7 倍(调整后的相对风险(aRR)7.3,CI 1.8-29.9),与<25 岁的产妇相比;否则,产妇年龄与产程引产持续时间之间无关联。产妇年龄与剖宫产、剖宫产指征、出血、输血、围产期感染或不良新生儿结局之间也无关联。此外,即使在最终行剖宫产的产妇中,产妇年龄与引产持续时间之间也无关联。
我们发现,对于<40 岁的产妇,产妇年龄与引产持续时间之间无关联。对于 40 岁及以上的产妇,引产持续时间达 60 小时或更长的风险增加。尽管如此,我们发现产妇年龄与剖宫产分娩或其他不良产妇或胎儿结局之间无关联。