Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Department of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 8;21(1):1097. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11025-y.
Household chicken production presents an opportunity to promote child nutrition, but the benefits might be offset by increased environmental contamination. Using household surveys, direct observations, and in-depth interviews with woman caregivers, we sought to describe the relationship between chicken management practices and household exposure to environmental contamination, and assess barriers to adopting improved husbandry practices.
First, we analyzed baseline data from 973 households raising chickens in the two interventions arms from the Agriculture-to-Nutrition (ATONU) study in Ethiopia to assess the relationship between animal management practices and environmental exposures. Second, we conducted six-hour direct observations of children's environmental exposures in 18 households. Among these households, we analyzed in-depth interviews with child caregivers.
Quantitative analyses showed that households raised approximately 11 chickens, had animal feces visible on the property 67% of the time, and children's hands were visibly dirty 38% of the time. Households with more chickens had lower exposure to animal feces. Having a chicken coop increased the risk of observing animal feces on the property by 30%, but among those with a coop, having an enclosed coop reduced that risk by 83%. Coops that were enclosed, had fencing, and were located further from homes were associated with a reduced risk of observing animal feces and an increased likelihood of children having clean hands. Direct observations showed that chicken coops were often poorly designed or not used. On average, 3 to 5 chickens were inside homes at a time, and livestock and domestic animals were frequently inside of houses and interacting with young children. In-depth interviews revealed that protection of animals, maintenance of household cleanliness and health, type of chicken (local versus improved) and resource constraints influenced management decisions.
Improvements in chicken management practices could mitigate the exposure of household members to environmental contamination. Our findings highlight the need for training and resources to promote safe animal husbandry practices and optimal child health in nutrition-sensitive livestock projects.
Clinical trials number: NCT03152227 ; Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on May 12, 2012.
家庭养鸡为促进儿童营养提供了机会,但这可能会因环境污染加剧而抵消。本研究通过家庭调查、直接观察和对女性照顾者的深入访谈,旨在描述鸡管理实践与家庭暴露于环境污染物之间的关系,并评估采用改进的养殖实践的障碍。
首先,我们分析了来自埃塞俄比亚农业营养(ATONU)研究中 973 户养鸡的干预组和对照组的基线数据,以评估动物管理实践与环境暴露之间的关系。其次,我们对 18 户家庭中儿童的环境暴露进行了六小时的直接观察,并对这些家庭中的儿童照顾者进行了深入访谈。
定量分析表明,家庭饲养了约 11 只鸡,动物粪便可见的时间占 67%,儿童的手明显脏污的时间占 38%。饲养鸡数量多的家庭,动物粪便暴露水平较低。有鸡舍增加了观察到物业上有动物粪便的风险 30%,但在有鸡舍的家庭中,有封闭鸡舍将风险降低了 83%。封闭、有围栏且远离住宅的鸡舍与观察到动物粪便的风险降低和儿童手清洁的可能性增加有关。直接观察显示,鸡舍的设计往往很差或未使用。平均而言,一次有 3 到 5 只鸡在室内,牲畜和家畜经常在室内与幼儿互动。深入访谈显示,保护动物、保持家庭清洁和卫生、鸡的类型(本地鸡与改良鸡)和资源限制影响了管理决策。
改进鸡的管理实践可以减轻家庭成员接触环境污染物的程度。我们的研究结果强调了培训和资源的必要性,以促进安全的动物养殖实践,并优化营养敏感的牲畜项目中的儿童健康。
临床试验编号:NCT03152227;于 2012 年 5 月 12 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上进行了回顾性注册。