Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 138 Sheng-Li Rd., Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Skeleton Materials and Bio-compatibility Core Lab, Research Center of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jun 8;16(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02519-x.
The optimal surgical technique for the fixation of inferior pole patellar fracture remains controversial. The aims of this study were (1) to compare clinical and radiological outcomes following fixation of inferior pole patellar fracture by using tension band wire (TBW) and transosseous reattachment (TOR) without excision of the bony fragment and (2) to determine the risk factors for postoperative radiological loss of reduction.
For this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients with inferior pole patellar fracture between January 2010 and December 2017 were recruited. The patients were grouped according to their fixation method (TBW or TOR), and demographic data, clinical outcomes, and postoperative Insall-Salvati (IS) ratio were analyzed. Then, the patients were grouped according to radiological loss of reduction, the possible risk factors for loss of reduction were identified, and odds ratios were calculated.
This study included 55 patients with inferior pole patellar fracture; 30 patients were treated using TBW and 25 were treated using TOR. Clinical failure occurred in two patients in the TBW group (7%) and three in the TOR group (12%). The rate of radiological loss of reduction was significant higher in the TOR group, whereas removal of implants was significantly more common in the TBW group. Patella baja was noted immediately after surgery in the TOR group, but the IS ratios of the two groups were similar after 3 months. Fracture displacement of more than 30 mm was the only independent risk factor for postoperative radiological loss of reduction.
For treating inferior pole patellar fracture, both TWB and TOR were effective and had a low clinical failure rate. In 60% of patients undergoing TBW fixation, however, additional surgery was required to remove the implants. Patella baja occurred immediately following TOR, but the patellar height was similar to that in the TBW group after 3 months. Surgeons should be aware of the high risk of postoperative radiological loss of reduction, especially when the fracture displacement is more than 30 mm.
对于固定髌骨下极骨折,最佳的手术技术仍存在争议。本研究的目的是:(1)比较使用张力带钢丝(TBW)和经骨再固定(TOR)固定髌骨下极骨折的临床和影像学结果,且不切除骨碎片;(2)确定术后影像学复位丢失的危险因素。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间连续就诊的髌骨下极骨折患者。根据固定方法(TBW 或 TOR)将患者分为两组,分析患者的人口统计学数据、临床结果和术后 Insall-Salvati(IS)比值。然后,根据影像学复位丢失情况将患者分组,确定复位丢失的可能危险因素,并计算比值比。
本研究纳入了 55 例髌骨下极骨折患者,其中 30 例患者接受 TBW 治疗,25 例患者接受 TOR 治疗。TBW 组有 2 例(7%)患者和 TOR 组有 3 例(12%)患者出现临床失败。TOR 组的影像学复位丢失率显著较高,而 TBW 组更常见需要取出植入物。TOR 组术后即刻出现髌骨低位,但两组的 IS 比值在 3 个月后相似。骨折移位超过 30mm 是术后影像学复位丢失的唯一独立危险因素。
对于治疗髌骨下极骨折,TBW 和 TOR 均有效,且临床失败率较低。然而,在 60%接受 TBW 固定的患者中,需要额外手术取出植入物。TOR 术后即刻出现髌骨低位,但 3 个月后髌骨高度与 TBW 组相似。手术医生应意识到术后影像学复位丢失的风险较高,尤其是当骨折移位超过 30mm 时。