Suppr超能文献

急性呼吸窘迫综合征的肺开放策略:其对死亡率的影响取决于实现的肺复张(动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值)和机械功率。系统评价及meta回归分析。

OLA strategy for ARDS: Its effect on mortality depends on achieved recruitment (PaO/FiO) and mechanical power. Systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.

作者信息

Modesto I Alapont V, Medina Villanueva A, Del Villar Guerra P, Camilo C, Fernández-Ureña S, Gordo-Vidal F, Khemani R

机构信息

PICU, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, València, Spain.

PICU, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun 5. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2021.03.016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The "Open Lung Approach" (OLA), that includes high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure coupled with limited tidal volumes, is considered optimal for adult patients with ARDS. However, many previous meta-analyses have shown only marginal benefits of OLA on mortality but with statistical heterogeneity. It is crucial to identify the most likely moderators of this effect. To determine the effect of OLA strategy on mortality of ventilated ARDS patients. We hypothesized that the degree of recruitment achieved in the control group (PaO/FiO ratio on day 3 of ventilation), and the difference in Mechanical Power (MP) or Driving Pressure (DP) between experimental and control groups will be the most likely sources of heterogeneity.

DESIGN

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO database. We searched only for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). GRADE guidelines were used for rating the quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed. For the Meta-analysis, we used a Random Effects Model. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with Meta-Regression, using a priori proposed set of possible moderators. For model comparison, Akaike's Information Criterion with the finite sample correction (AICc) was used.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Fourteen RCTs were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

Not applicable.

RESULTS

Evidence of publication bias was detected, and quality of evidence was downgraded. Pooled analysis did not show a significant difference in the 28-day mortality between OLA strategy and control groups. Overall risk of bias was low. The analysis detected statistical heterogeneity. The two "best" explicative meta-regression models were those that used control PaO/FiO on day 3 and difference in MP between experimental and control groups. The DP and MP models were highly correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear benefit of OLA strategy on mortality of ARDS patients, with significant heterogeneity among RCTs. Mortality effect of OLA is mediated by lung recruitment and mechanical power.

摘要

目的

“开放肺策略”(OLA),包括高水平呼气末正压联合小潮气量,被认为是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)成年患者的最佳治疗方法。然而,许多既往的荟萃分析仅显示OLA对死亡率有微小益处,但存在统计学异质性。确定这种效应最可能的调节因素至关重要。为了确定OLA策略对接受机械通气的ARDS患者死亡率的影响。我们假设对照组达到的肺复张程度(通气第3天的动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度比值),以及实验组与对照组之间机械功率(MP)或驱动压(DP)的差异将是最可能的异质性来源。

设计

根据PRISMA声明进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并在PROSPERO数据库中注册。我们仅检索随机对照试验(RCT)。采用GRADE指南对证据质量进行评级。评估发表偏倚。对于荟萃分析,我们使用随机效应模型。使用预先提出的一组可能的调节因素,通过Meta回归探索异质性来源。为了进行模型比较,使用了带有有限样本校正的赤池信息准则(AICc)。

设置

不适用。

患者

本研究纳入了14项RCT。

干预措施

不适用。

主要研究变量

不适用。

结果

检测到发表偏倚的证据,证据质量被降级。汇总分析未显示OLA策略组与对照组在28天死亡率上有显著差异。总体偏倚风险较低。分析检测到统计学异质性。两个“最佳”解释性Meta回归模型是使用第3天对照组动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度比值和实验组与对照组之间MP差异的模型。DP和MP模型高度相关。

结论

OLA策略对ARDS患者死亡率没有明显益处,RCT之间存在显著异质性。OLA的死亡率效应由肺复张和机械功率介导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验