Suppr超能文献

医疗保健专业学生出于实际和道德原因支持选择退出式器官捐赠。

Healthcare students support opt-out organ donation for practical and moral reasons.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2022 Aug;48(8):522-529. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107053. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Changes to deceased organ donation policy in the USA, including opt-out and priority systems, have been proposed to increase registration and donation rates. To study attitudes towards such policies, we surveyed healthcare students to assess support for opt-out and priority systems and reasons for support or opposition.

METHODS

We investigated associations with supporting opt-out, including organ donation knowledge, altruism, trust in the healthcare system, prioritising autonomy and participants' evaluation of the moral severity of incorrectly assuming consent in opt-in systems ('opt-in error') or opt-out systems ('opt-out error'), by conducting an online survey among healthcare students at a large academic institution.

RESULTS

Of 523 respondents, 86% supported opt-out, including 53% who strongly supported the policy. The most popular reason for supporting opt-out was the potential for increased donation rates, followed by convenience for those not registered but willing to donate. The most popular reason for opposing opt-out was the belief that presuming consent is morally wrong. Those strongly supporting opt-out viewed the opt-in error as more morally unacceptable, and had higher knowledge and altruism scores. Those opposing opt-out viewed the opt-out error as more unacceptable, and had higher autonomy scores. 48% of respondents supported priority within opt-in systems; 31% supported priority in opt-out.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong support for opt-out organ donation among healthcare students, influenced by both practical and moral considerations.

摘要

背景与目的

美国提出改变已故器官捐赠政策,包括选择退出和优先制度,以提高登记和捐赠率。为了研究人们对这些政策的态度,我们调查了医疗保健专业的学生,以评估他们对选择退出和优先制度的支持程度,并了解他们支持或反对这些制度的原因。

方法

我们通过在一所大型学术机构的医疗保健专业学生中进行在线调查,研究了支持选择退出的关联因素,包括器官捐赠知识、利他主义、对医疗保健系统的信任、对自主权的重视以及参与者对在选择加入系统中错误假定同意(“选择加入错误”)或选择退出系统中错误假定同意(“选择退出错误”)的道德严重性的评估。

结果

在 523 名受访者中,有 86%支持选择退出,其中 53%强烈支持该政策。支持选择退出的最常见原因是潜在的捐赠率提高,其次是对未登记但愿意捐赠的人的方便性。反对选择退出的最常见原因是认为假定同意在道德上是错误的。强烈支持选择退出的人认为选择加入错误在道德上更不可接受,并且他们的知识和利他主义得分更高。反对选择退出的人认为选择退出错误更不可接受,并且他们的自主权得分更高。48%的受访者支持选择加入系统中的优先级;31%支持选择退出系统中的优先级。

结论

医疗保健专业的学生强烈支持选择退出器官捐赠,这受到实际和道德考虑的影响。

相似文献

1
Healthcare students support opt-out organ donation for practical and moral reasons.
J Med Ethics. 2022 Aug;48(8):522-529. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107053. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
3
Opt-out policy and the organ shortage problem: Critical insights and practical considerations.
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2021 Jan;35(1):100589. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2020.100589. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
4
Assessing the factors that influence the donation of a deceased family member's organs in an opt-out system for organ donation.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jan;317:115545. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115545. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
5
Opt-in Vs. Opt-out of Organ Donation in Scotland: Bioethical analysis.
New Bioeth. 2022 Dec;28(4):341-349. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2022.2095714. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
6
Presumed Dissent? Opt-out Organ Donation and the Exclusion of Organs and Tissues.
Med Law Rev. 2022 May 30;30(2):268-298. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwac001.
10
Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems.
Kidney Int. 2019 Jun;95(6):1453-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Examination of Racial and Ethnic Differences in Deceased Organ Donation Ratio Over Time in the US.
JAMA Surg. 2021 Apr 1;156(4):e207083. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.7083. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Estimated Association Between Organ Availability and Presumed Consent in Solid Organ Transplant.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912431. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12431.
4
Success of Opt-In Organ Donation Policy in the United States.
JAMA. 2019 Aug 27;322(8):719-720. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9187.
6
Opt-out legislations: the mysterious viability of the false.
Kidney Int. 2019 Jun;95(6):1301-1303. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.02.028.
7
Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems.
Kidney Int. 2019 Jun;95(6):1453-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
8
Role of Empathy and Altruism in Organ Donation Decisionmaking Among Nursing and Paramedic Students.
Transplant Proc. 2018 Sep;50(7):1928-1932. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.153. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Ten years of Israel's organ transplant law: is it on the right track?
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Aug 1;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0232-1.
10
Determinants of organ donation registration.
Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2798-2803. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15025. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验