1State Institution, Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy, Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine, Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery Department, Postgraduate Education Faculty; 2Public Institution, Mechnikov Dnipropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Ukraine.
1State Institution, Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy, Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine, Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery Department, Postgraduate Education Faculty; Ukraine.
Georgian Med News. 2021 Apr(313):60-65.
Headache after craniocerebral injury is an urgent problem due to its frequent occurrence, tendency towards chronization, and strong patient disadaptation effect. Despite the significant incidence of post-traumatic headache (the PTHA) and related socioeconomic factors, many fundamental aspects of this problem have not been considered adequately. Therefore, the aim of our review is to highlight key points regarding the pathogenetic mechanisms of development, key clinical features, and strategies for optimal management of PTHA. A literature review was performed using the Pubmed database by selecting articles about post-traumatic headache (PTHA) over 10 years (from 2010 to 2020).The search was performed in English, Russian, and Ukrainian using the following key words and terms: post-traumatic headache, post-traumatic cephalalgia, headache after brain injury, and post-concussion syndrome. All articles with information on etiology, pathogenesis, clinic, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, neuroimaging, pathomorphological evaluation, and treatment strategies for this pathology were included in the analysis. After identifying all the articles that met the inclusion criteria and deleting duplicate data, 46 literature sources on PTHA were selected. According to the International Headache Classification, PTHA is a secondary cephalalgia associated with head and/or neck injury, which develops within 7 days of a craniocerebral injury. A distinction is made between acute and persistent PTHA associated with mild, moderate, and severe injury. To diagnose persistent PTHA, it is sufficient to establish a causal link between the fact of head injury and the duration of pain for 3+ months. It is interestingly that individuals with mild craniocerebral injury have both higher incidence and higher duration and intensity of PTHA compared to those with severe injury. Despite the absence of specific characteristics, several clinical phenotypes of PTHA are distinguished, the most common of which are migraine-like and tensor types. The pathogenetic mechanisms of PTHA development are complex and diverse. Since recently, special attention has been paid to activation of the trigemino-vasculo-thalamic system, central sensitization, and GCRP-associated mechanisms that probably play an important role in the PTHA pathogenesis. Modern neuroimaging methods using diffusion-tensor and functional MRI are important in the PTHA diagnosis and differential diagnosis. PTHA treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach and includes a combination of drug and drug-free methods. Despite a long history of PTHA research, the issues concerning diagnostic criteria, pathogenetic mechanisms, clinical features, and strategies, in particular in patients who suffered severe craniocerebral injury, have not been considered properly. The above data indicate the need to clarify many aspects of the studied problem.
颅脑损伤后头痛是一个紧迫的问题,因为它的发生率高、易慢性化,且对患者的适应能力影响较大。尽管外伤性头痛(PTHA)的发病率很高,且与相关的社会经济因素有关,但该问题的许多基本方面尚未得到充分考虑。因此,我们的综述旨在强调外伤性头痛发病机制、关键临床特征和最佳管理策略的要点。通过使用 Pubmed 数据库,我们以英文、俄文和乌克兰文检索了 10 年来(2010 年至 2020 年)有关外伤性头痛(PTHA)的文章,检索词包括外伤性头痛、外伤性头痛、脑损伤后头痛和脑震荡后综合征。所有包含该病理学病因、发病机制、临床、诊断、鉴别诊断、神经影像学、病理形态学评估和治疗策略信息的文章均纳入分析。在确定了所有符合纳入标准的文章并删除重复数据后,共选择了 46 篇关于 PTHA 的文献来源。根据国际头痛分类,PTHA 是一种与头部和/或颈部损伤相关的继发性头痛,在颅脑损伤后 7 天内发生。急性和持续性 PTHA 与轻度、中度和重度损伤有关。为了诊断持续性 PTHA,仅需在头部受伤的事实与疼痛持续 3 个月以上之间建立因果关系即可。有趣的是,与重度颅脑损伤相比,轻度颅脑损伤患者的 PTHA 发生率更高,疼痛持续时间更长,疼痛强度更大。尽管没有特异性特征,但仍可区分出几种 PTHA 的临床表型,其中最常见的是偏头痛样和张量型。PTHA 的发病机制复杂多样。最近,人们特别关注三叉神经血管丘脑系统的激活、中枢敏化和与 GCRP 相关的机制,这些机制可能在外伤性头痛的发病机制中发挥重要作用。使用弥散张量和功能 MRI 的现代神经影像学方法在 PTHA 的诊断和鉴别诊断中非常重要。PTHA 的治疗需要多学科的方法,包括药物和非药物方法的结合。尽管 PTHA 的研究历史悠久,但有关诊断标准、发病机制、临床特征和策略的问题,特别是在遭受严重颅脑损伤的患者中,尚未得到妥善处理。上述数据表明,需要澄清所研究问题的许多方面。