Lea John W D, O'Driscoll Jamie M, Coleman Damian A, Wiles Jonathan D
School of Human and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
J Clin Transl Res. 2021 Mar 24;7(2):248-256. eCollection 2021 Apr 22.
Isometric exercise (IE), including wall squat training, has been shown to be effective at reducing resting blood pressure (BP). Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is also widely used as an accessible additional measure of IE intensity. Despite this, no RPE scales have been specifically designed for use with IE and it is not clear whether RPE is sensitive enough to distinguish between different lower limb IE workloads. Therefore, the aims of this study were to assess the validity and reliability of RPE as a measure of IE intensity (workload) and physiological exertion (Heart rate and BP), and to examine whether RPE is able to discern differences in wall squat workload (knee angle) at a resolution of 10-degrees, as was previous shown for heart rate (HR) and BP.
Twenty-nine male participants completed eight separate isometric wall squat testing sessions, separated by a minimum of 5-h. Each session consisted of a single 2-min isometric wall squat test, at one of five randomized workloads (knee joint angles). Three of the knee angles were repeated, a second time, to allow measurements of reliability. Throughout the exercise protocol, HR and BP were recorded continuously; values for each 30-s time-point were calculated as the mean of the proceeding 5-s, and peak values for the 2-min bout were taken as the mean results for the final 5-s of the bout. In addition, mean results for the full 2-min period were calculated. RPE was collected every 30 s. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating RPE results with the criterion measures: Knee joint angle, HR, and BP. Differences in RPE were assessed across consecutive workloads and time-points.
There were significant increases in RPE at each consecutive wall squat workload (P<0.001) and between each consecutive 30-s time point (P<0.001). In addition, the RPE results produced a significant inverse relationship with knee angle (r=-0.79; P<0.001) and significant positive relationships with HR (r=0.53, P<0.001) and BP (systolic: r=0.77; diastolic: r=0.62; and mean arterial pressure: r=0.70, P<0.001).
RPE provides a valid and reliable measure of isometric wall squat intensity, physiological exertion and can discern between knee angles with a resolution of 10°.
Patients and practitioners implementing isometric exercise training for arterial blood pressure reduction can use RPE to accurately monitor the intensity of the exercise and the physiological responses.
等长运动(IE),包括靠墙静蹲训练,已被证明能有效降低静息血压(BP)。主观用力程度分级(RPE)也被广泛用作IE强度的一种易于获取的额外测量指标。尽管如此,尚无专门为IE设计的RPE量表,并且尚不清楚RPE是否足够敏感以区分不同的下肢IE工作量。因此,本研究的目的是评估RPE作为IE强度(工作量)和生理运动强度(心率和血压)测量指标的有效性和可靠性,并检验RPE是否能够像先前心率(HR)和血压那样,以10度的分辨率辨别靠墙静蹲工作量(膝关节角度)的差异。
29名男性参与者完成了8次单独的靠墙静蹲测试,每次测试间隔至少5小时。每次测试包括一次2分钟的靠墙静蹲测试,测试膝关节角度为五个随机工作量之一。其中三个膝关节角度被重复测试一次,以进行可靠性测量。在整个运动过程中,持续记录心率和血压;每个30秒时间点的值计算为前5秒的平均值,2分钟运动期间的峰值取该时间段最后5秒的平均结果。此外,还计算了整个2分钟时间段的平均结果。每30秒收集一次RPE数据。通过将RPE结果与标准测量指标(膝关节角度、心率和血压)进行相关性分析来评估同时效度。评估连续工作量和时间点之间RPE的差异。
在每次连续的靠墙静蹲工作量时,RPE均显著增加(P<0.001),并且在每连续的30秒时间点之间也显著增加(P<0.001)。此外,RPE结果与膝关节角度呈显著负相关(r=-0.79;P<0.001),与心率呈显著正相关(r=0.53,P<0.001),与血压呈显著正相关(收缩压:r=0.77;舒张压:r=0.62;平均动脉压:r=0.70,P<0.001)。
RPE为靠墙静蹲强度、生理运动强度提供了有效且可靠的测量指标,并且能够以10°的分辨率辨别膝关节角度的差异。
实施等长运动训练以降低动脉血压的患者和从业者可以使用RPE准确监测运动强度和生理反应。