Suppr超能文献

增强代际项目的影响力:推进评估工具。

Increasing the Power of Intergenerational Programs: Advancing an Evaluation Tool.

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Mar;41(3):763-768. doi: 10.1177/07334648211015459. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Abstract

Intergenerational practitioners responding to a 2018 national survey identified a need for evidence-informed evaluation tools to measure program impact. The Best Practices (BP) Checklist, a 14-item (yes/no) measure assessing the extent to which an intergenerational program session maintained effective intergenerational strategies, may help meet this need. Yet, researchers have not validated the measure. In this study, we begin the empirical validation process by completing an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the BP Checklist to offer insight into possible item reduction and an underlying latent factor structure. Using BP Checklist data from 132 intergenerational activities, we found a 13-item, 3-factor structure, reflecting dimensions of: (a) pairing intergenerational participants, (b) person-centered strategies (e.g., selecting activities reflecting participants' interests), and (c) staff knowledge of participants. Our study represents a foundational step toward optimizing intergenerational program evaluation, thereby enhancing programming quality.

摘要

代际从业者对 2018 年的一项全国性调查做出回应,确定需要证据为基础的评估工具来衡量项目的影响。最佳实践 (BP) 清单是一个 14 项(是/否)的衡量标准,用于评估代际项目会议在多大程度上保持了有效的代际策略,这可能有助于满足这一需求。然而,研究人员尚未验证该措施。在这项研究中,我们通过对 BP 清单进行探索性因素分析 (EFA) 来开始实证验证过程,以深入了解可能的项目缩减和潜在的潜在因素结构。我们使用来自 132 项代际活动的 BP 清单数据,发现了一个 13 项、3 个因素的结构,反映了以下几个方面:(a) 配对代际参与者,(b) 以个人为中心的策略(例如,选择反映参与者兴趣的活动),以及 (c) 工作人员对参与者的了解。我们的研究代表了优化代际项目评估的基础步骤,从而提高项目质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84af/8847764/4e1ee41fd67a/10.1177_07334648211015459-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验