Suppr超能文献

用于特征识别测试材料的频率重要性函数。

Frequency importance functions for a feature recognition test material.

作者信息

Duggirala V, Studebaker G A, Pavlovic C V, Sherbecoe R L

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Jun;83(6):2372-82. doi: 10.1121/1.396316.

Abstract

The relative importance of different parts of the auditory spectrum to recognition of the Diagnostic Rhyme Test (DRT) and its six speech feature subtests was determined. Three normal hearing subjects were tested twice in each of 70 experimental conditions. The analytical procedures of French and Steinberg [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19, 90-119 (1947)] were applied to the data to derive frequency importance functions for each of the DRT subtests and the test as a whole over the frequency range 178-8912 Hz. For the DRT as a whole, the low frequencies were found to be more important than is the case for nonsense syllables. Importance functions for the feature subtests also differed from those for nonsense syllables and from each other as well. These results suggest that test materials loaded with different proportions of particular phonemes have different frequency importance functions. Comparison of the results with those from other studies suggests that importance functions depend to a degree on the available response options as well.

摘要

确定了听觉频谱不同部分对诊断韵律测试(DRT)及其六个语音特征子测试识别的相对重要性。三名听力正常的受试者在70种实验条件下各接受了两次测试。将French和Steinberg [《美国声学学会杂志》19, 90 - 119 (1947)] 的分析程序应用于数据,以得出DRT每个子测试以及整个测试在178 - 8912 Hz频率范围内的频率重要性函数。对于整个DRT,发现低频比无意义音节的情况更重要。特征子测试的重要性函数也与无意义音节的不同,并且彼此之间也不同。这些结果表明,加载不同比例特定音素的测试材料具有不同的频率重要性函数。将结果与其他研究的结果进行比较表明,重要性函数在一定程度上也取决于可用的反应选项。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验