• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心任务分析和以用户为中心的评估对紧急剖宫产物理空间的影响。

Single-center task analysis and user-centered assessment of physical space impacts on emergency Cesarean delivery.

机构信息

San José State University, San Jose, California, United States of America.

The Safety Learning Laboratory for Neonatal and Maternal Care, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252888. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252888
PMID:34111177
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8191948/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to begin to address this gap using validated techniques in human factors to perform a participatory user-centered analysis of physical space during emergency Cesarean.

METHODS

This study employed a mixed-methods design. Focus group interviews and surveys were administered to a convenience sample (n = 34) of multidisciplinary obstetric teams. Data collected from focus group interviews were used to perform a task and equipment analysis. Survey data were coded and mapped by specialty to identify reported areas of congestion and time spent, and to identify themes related to physical space of the OR and labor and delivery unit.

RESULTS

Task analysis revealed complex interdependencies between specialties. Thirty task groupings requiring over 20 pieces of equipment were identified. Perceived areas of congestion and areas of time spent in the OR varied by clinical specialty. The following categories emerged as main challenges encountered during an emergency Cesarean: 1) size of physical space and equipment, 2) layout and orientation, and 3) patient transport.

CONCLUSION

User insights on physical space and workflow processes during emergency Cesarean section at the institution studied revealed challenges related to getting the patients into the OR expediently and having space to perform tasks without crowding or staff injury. By utilizing human factors techniques, other institutions may build upon our findings to improve safety during emergency situations on labor and delivery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用人为因素学中的已验证技术,对紧急剖宫产过程中的物理空间进行参与式以用户为中心的分析,从而填补这一空白。

方法

本研究采用混合方法设计。对多学科产科团队的便利样本(n=34)进行了焦点小组访谈和调查。从焦点小组访谈中收集的数据用于进行任务和设备分析。对调查数据进行了编码,并按专业进行了映射,以确定报告的拥堵区域和时间,并确定与手术室和产房物理空间以及与时间相关的主题。

结果

任务分析揭示了专业之间的复杂相互依存关系。确定了 30 个需要 20 多件设备的任务分组。各临床专业对手术室的拥堵区域和时间的感知存在差异。在紧急剖宫产过程中遇到的主要挑战包括:1)物理空间和设备的大小,2)布局和方向,3)患者转运。

结论

在研究机构中对紧急剖宫产期间物理空间和工作流程的用户见解揭示了与迅速将患者送入手术室以及有足够空间进行任务而不会拥挤或造成员工受伤相关的挑战。通过利用人为因素技术,其他机构可以在我们的研究结果的基础上进一步改进分娩室紧急情况下的安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/c33fd886af1f/pone.0252888.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/c92a30112ede/pone.0252888.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/a9b2b40d3d31/pone.0252888.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/64a995ab2d77/pone.0252888.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/8320ffa46668/pone.0252888.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/c33fd886af1f/pone.0252888.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/c92a30112ede/pone.0252888.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/a9b2b40d3d31/pone.0252888.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/64a995ab2d77/pone.0252888.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/8320ffa46668/pone.0252888.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ef/8191948/c33fd886af1f/pone.0252888.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Single-center task analysis and user-centered assessment of physical space impacts on emergency Cesarean delivery.单中心任务分析和以用户为中心的评估对紧急剖宫产物理空间的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252888. eCollection 2021.
2
Analyzing the heterogeneity of labor and delivery units: A quantitative analysis of space and design.分析劳动分娩单位的异质性:空间和设计的定量分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0209339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209339. eCollection 2018.
3
Randomized Controlled Simulation Trial to Compare Transfer Procedures for Emergency Cesarean.随机对照模拟试验比较紧急剖宫产的中转程序。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2020 May;49(3):272-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
4
Response times for emergency cesarean delivery: use of simulation drills to assess and improve obstetric team performance.紧急剖宫产的反应时间:使用模拟演练评估和提高产科团队的表现。
J Perinatol. 2013 Apr;33(4):259-63. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.98. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
5
Indications for Emergency Intervention, Mode of Delivery, and the Childbirth Experience.紧急干预的指征、分娩方式及分娩体验。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169132. eCollection 2017.
6
Does prolonged labor affect the birth experience and subsequent wish for cesarean section among first-time mothers? A quantitative and qualitative analysis of a survey from Norway.长时间分娩是否会影响初产妇的分娩体验和随后对剖宫产的愿望?来自挪威的一项调查的定量和定性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03196-0.
7
Crew Resource Management for Obstetric and Neonatal Teams to Improve Communication During Cesarean Births.产科和新生儿团队的机组资源管理,以改善剖宫产期间的沟通。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;45(4):502-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
8
Socio-cultural and clinician determinants in the maternal decision-making process in the choice for trial of labor vs. elective repeated cesarean section: a questionnaire comparison between Italian settings.社会文化和临床医生因素对产妇选择试产与选择性重复剖宫产决策过程的影响:意大利环境下的问卷调查比较。
J Perinat Med. 2019 Aug 27;47(6):656-664. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0041.
9
Action: promoting normal birth.
Pract Midwife. 2002 Mar;5(3):4.
10
Survey of Obstetric Care and Cesarean Delivery Rates in Shanghai, China.中国上海产科护理与剖宫产率调查
Birth. 2016 Sep;43(3):193-9. doi: 10.1111/birt.12231. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Births: Final Data for 2019.出生人数:2019 年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021 Apr;70(2):1-51.
2
Interventions for improving teamwork in intrapartem care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.改善产时护理团队合作的干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):77-85. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009689. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
Understanding the Heterogeneity of Labor and Delivery Units: Using Design Thinking Methodology to Assess Environmental Factors that Contribute to Safety in Childbirth.
了解分娩单位的异质性:运用设计思维方法评估导致分娩安全的环境因素。
Am J Perinatol. 2020 May;37(6):638-646. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685494. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209: Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第 209 号:产科镇痛与麻醉
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):e208-e225. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003132.
5
Analyzing the heterogeneity of labor and delivery units: A quantitative analysis of space and design.分析劳动分娩单位的异质性:空间和设计的定量分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0209339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209339. eCollection 2018.
6
Facility Design: Reimagining Approaches to Childbirth in Hospital and Birth Center Settings.设施设计:重新构想医院和分娩中心环境下的分娩方式。
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2019 Jan/Mar;33(1):26-34. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000376.
7
Assessing the Feasibility of Measuring Variation in Facility Design Among American Childbirth Facilities.评估美国分娩机构在设施设计方面的差异的可行性。
HERD. 2019 Apr;12(2):30-43. doi: 10.1177/1937586718796641. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
8
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety on Labor and Delivery.分娩过程中的质量改进和患者安全。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;44(4):667-678. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.002.
9
Recent advances of simulation in obstetric anesthesia.产科麻醉模拟技术的最新进展。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec;30(6):723-729. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000522.
10
Safety, Performance, and Satisfaction Outcomes in the Operating Room: A Literature Review.手术室中的安全性、性能和满意度结果:文献综述
HERD. 2018 Apr;11(2):137-150. doi: 10.1177/1937586717705107. Epub 2017 Apr 24.