Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Sep;233(3):357-368.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.05.020. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
The current study aimed to assess the performance of the 3-level complexity classification that stratified liver resection procedures into 3 complexity grades (grade I, low; grade II, intermediate; and grade III, high complexity) and to evaluate whether the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol improves postoperative outcomes for each complexity grade.
Consecutive patients undergoing open liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection at Lausanne University Hospital during 2010 to 2020 were assessed.
A total of 437 patients were included. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay increased significantly, with a stepwise increase of the grades from I to III in open liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection (all, p < 0.05). The same trend for Comprehensive Complication Index was found in open liver resection (p < 0.005). Age (p = 0.004), 3-level complexity classification (grade II vs I; p = 0.001; grade III vs I; p < 0.001), no use of the ERAS protocol (p = 0.016), and biliary reconstruction (p < 0.001) were significant predictors for postoperative complication, defined as Comprehensive Complication Index ≥ 26.2 in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The prediction model incorporating the 4 factors had a calculated Concordance Index of 0.735 and 0.742 based on the bootstrapping method. The use of ERAS protocol was associated with lower probability of postoperative complication for each complexity grade and age.
The use of ERAS protocol can decrease the probability of postoperative complication for each surgical complexity of liver resection and patient age. This finding emphasized the importance of tailoring perioperative management according to surgical complexity and patient age to improve outcomes after liver resection.
本研究旨在评估将肝切除术分为 3 个复杂程度等级(I 级,低;II 级,中;III 级,高)的 3 级复杂度分类的性能,并评估增强术后康复(ERAS)方案是否改善每个复杂程度等级的术后结果。
评估了 2010 年至 2020 年期间在洛桑大学附属医院接受开放肝切除术和腹腔镜肝切除术的连续患者。
共纳入 437 例患者。在开放肝切除术和腹腔镜肝切除术,手术时间、估计失血量和住院时间均显著增加,随着等级从 I 级到 III 级呈阶梯式增加(均,p < 0.05)。在开放肝切除术也发现了综合并发症指数的相同趋势(p < 0.005)。年龄(p = 0.004)、3 级复杂度分类(等级 II 与 I 相比;p = 0.001;等级 III 与 I 相比;p < 0.001)、未使用 ERAS 方案(p = 0.016)和胆道重建(p < 0.001)是术后并发症的显著预测因素,定义为综合并发症指数≥26.2 的多变量逻辑回归分析。基于 Bootstrap 方法的 4 因素纳入的预测模型具有 0.735 和 0.742 的计算一致性指数。ERAS 方案的使用与每个手术复杂度和年龄的肝切除术后并发症概率降低相关。
ERAS 方案的使用可以降低每个肝切除手术复杂程度和患者年龄的术后并发症概率。这一发现强调了根据手术复杂度和患者年龄调整围手术期管理以改善肝切除术后结果的重要性。