Suppr超能文献

机器人手术方法与强化康复计划相结合可改善复杂肝切除术的围手术期结局。

Robotic approach together with an enhanced recovery programme improve the perioperative outcomes for complex hepatectomy.

作者信息

Xie Fei, Wang Dongdong, Ge Jin, Liao Wenjun, Li Enliang, Wu Linquan, Lei Jun

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Jiangxi Province Engineering Research Center of Hepatobiliary Disease, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Jun 2;10:1135505. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1135505. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Robotic surgery has more advantages than traditional surgical approaches to complex liver resection; however, the robotic approach is invariably associated with increased cost. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are beneficial in conventional surgeries.

METHODS

The present study investigated the effects of robotic surgery combined with an ERAS protocol on perioperative outcomes and hospitalization costs of patients undergoing complex hepatectomy. Clinical data from consecutive robotic and open liver resections (RLR and OLR, respectively) performed in our unit in the pre-ERAS (January 2019-June 2020) and ERAS (July 2020-December 2021) periods were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of ERAS and surgical approaches-alone or in combination-on LOS and costs.

RESULTS

A total of 171 consecutive complex liver resections were analyzed. ERAS patients had a shorter median LOS and decreased total hospitalization cost, without a significant difference in the complication rate compared with the pre-ERAS cohort. RLR patients had a shorter median LOS and decreased major complications, but with increased total hospitalization cost, compared with OLR patients. Comparing the four combinations of perioperative management and surgical approaches, ERAS + RLR had the shortest LOS and the fewest major complications, whereas pre-ERAS + RLR had the highest hospitalization costs. Multivariate analysis found that the robotic approach was protective against prolonged LOS, whereas the ERAS pathway was protective against high costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The ERAS + RLR approach optimized postoperative complex liver resection outcomes and hospitalization costs compared with other combinations. The robotic approach combined with ERAS synergistically optimized outcome and overall cost compared with other strategies, and may be the best combination for optimizing perioperative outcomes for complex RLR.

摘要

目的

在复杂肝脏切除术中,机器人手术比传统手术方法具有更多优势;然而,机器人手术方法不可避免地会导致成本增加。术后加速康复(ERAS)方案在传统手术中是有益的。

方法

本研究调查了机器人手术联合ERAS方案对接受复杂肝切除术患者围手术期结局和住院费用的影响。收集了在我们科室于ERAS前(2019年1月至2020年6月)和ERAS期间(2020年7月至2021年12月)连续进行的机器人肝切除术和开放肝切除术(分别为RLR和OLR)的临床数据。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定ERAS和手术方法单独或联合对住院时间和费用的影响。

结果

共分析了171例连续的复杂肝脏切除术。与ERAS前队列相比,ERAS患者的中位住院时间较短,总住院费用降低,并发症发生率无显著差异。与OLR患者相比,RLR患者的中位住院时间较短,主要并发症减少,但总住院费用增加。比较围手术期管理和手术方法的四种组合,ERAS + RLR的住院时间最短,主要并发症最少,而ERAS前 + RLR的住院费用最高。多因素分析发现,机器人手术方法可预防住院时间延长,而ERAS途径可预防高费用。

结论

与其他组合相比,ERAS + RLR方法优化了术后复杂肝脏切除术的结局和住院费用。与其他策略相比,机器人手术方法与ERAS联合可协同优化结局和总体成本,可能是优化复杂RLR围手术期结局的最佳组合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43ee/10272522/6612cdfe4b0d/fsurg-10-1135505-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验