Stolldorf Deonni P, Ridner Sheila H, Vogus Timothy J, Roumie Christianne L, Schnipper Jeffrey L, Dietrich Mary S, Schlundt David G, Kripalani Sunil
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, 461 21st Ave S., Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University Owen Graduate School of Management, 401 21st Ave S., Nashville, TN, USA.
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 10;2(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00162-5.
Medication reconciliation (MedRec) is an important patient safety initiative that aims to prevent patient harm from medication errors. Yet, the implementation and sustainability of MedRec interventions have been challenging due to contextual barriers like the lack of interprofessional communication (among pharmacists, nurses, and providers) and limited organizational capacity. How to best implement MedRec interventions remains unclear. Guided by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy, we report the differing strategies hospital implementation teams used to implement an evidence-based MedRec Toolkit (the MARQUIS Toolkit).
A qualitative study was conducted with implementation teams and executive leaders of hospitals participating in the federally funded "Implementation of a Medication Reconciliation Toolkit to Improve Patient Safety" (known as MARQUIS2) research study. Data consisted of transcripts from web-based focus groups and individual interviews, as well as meeting minutes. Interview data were transcribed and analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison technique.
Data were collected from 16 hospitals using 2 focus groups, 3 group interviews, and 11 individual interviews, 10 sites' meeting minutes, and an email interview of an executive. Major categories of implementation strategies predominantly mirrored the ERIC strategies of "Plan," "Educate," "Restructure," and "Quality Management." Participants rarely used the ERIC strategies of finance and attending to policy context. Two new non-ERIC categories of strategies emerged-"Integration" and "Professional roles and responsibilities." Of the 73 specific strategies in the ERIC taxonomy, 32 were used to implement the MARQUIS Toolkit and 11 new, and non-ERIC strategies were identified (e.g., aligning with existing initiatives and professional roles and responsibilities).
Complex interventions like the MARQUIS MedRec Toolkit can benefit from the ERIC taxonomy, but adaptations and new strategies (and even categories) are necessary to fully capture the range of approaches to implementation.
用药重整(MedRec)是一项重要的患者安全举措,旨在防止用药错误对患者造成伤害。然而,由于存在跨专业沟通不足(药剂师、护士和医疗服务提供者之间)以及组织能力有限等背景障碍,MedRec干预措施的实施和可持续性一直具有挑战性。如何最佳地实施MedRec干预措施仍不明确。在实施变革专家建议(ERIC)分类法的指导下,我们报告了医院实施团队用于实施循证MedRec工具包(MARQUIS工具包)的不同策略。
对参与联邦资助的“实施用药重整工具包以提高患者安全”(称为MARQUIS2)研究的医院实施团队和行政领导进行了定性研究。数据包括基于网络的焦点小组和个人访谈的文字记录以及会议纪要。访谈数据通过内容分析和持续比较技术进行转录和分析。
从16家医院收集了数据,采用了2个焦点小组、3次小组访谈、11次个人访谈、10个地点的会议纪要以及对一名行政人员的电子邮件访谈。实施策略的主要类别主要反映了ERIC的“计划”“教育”“重组”和“质量管理”策略。参与者很少使用ERIC的财务和关注政策背景策略。出现了两个新的非ERIC策略类别——“整合”和“专业角色与职责”。在ERIC分类法的73项具体策略中,32项用于实施MARQUIS工具包,还确定了11项新的非ERIC策略(例如,与现有举措以及专业角色和职责保持一致)。
像MARQUIS MedRec工具包这样的复杂干预措施可以从ERIC分类法中受益,但需要进行调整并采用新策略(甚至新类别),以充分涵盖实施方法的范围。