Suppr超能文献

评估科威特政府医院医生和药剂师在药物重整方面的知识、认知和实践:一项横断面研究。

Assessing the knowledge, perception and practices of physicians and pharmacists towards medication reconciliation in Kuwait governmental hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Kuwait University - Shuwaikh Campus, Shuwaikh, Kuwait.

Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kuwait University - Shuwaikh Campus, Shuwaikh, Kuwait.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 16;9(6):e027395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027395.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the knowledge, perception and practices towards medication reconciliation (MedRec) and its related institutional policies among physicians and pharmacists in governmental hospitals in Kuwait and identifying potential obstacles that prevent the successful implementation of MedRec.

DESIGN

A descriptive, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Six governmental hospitals across Kuwait in January-May 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

351 physicians and 214 pharmacists.

BRIEF INTERVENTION

A self-administered questionnaire distributed to the participants.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Knowledge, perception, attitudes and practices of hospital physicians and pharmacists towards MedRec, and major barriers to implementing a MedRec process in their institution/department.

RESULTS

Of the 739 questionnaires distributed, 565 were completed (351 physicians and 214 pharmacists), giving a response rate of 76.5%. Results showed that most participants were familiar with the term MedRec (n=419; 75.2%) with significantly more pharmacists compared with physicians (n=171; 81.8% vs n=248; 71.3%; p=0.005). Most participants (n=432; 80.0%) reported perceiving MedRec as a valuable process for patient safety. However, significantly more physicians compared with pharmacists were aware of a MedRec policy in their institution (n=195; 55.9% vs n=78; 37.9%; p<0.001) and routinely asked patients about their current list of medication on arrival (n=339; 96.6% vs n=129; 61.1%; p<0.001) and provided an updated list on discharge (n=281; 80.1% vs n=107; 52.0%; p<0.001). These results are supported by the findings that participants perceived physicians as providers, mainly responsible for various steps of MedRec.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study showed low awareness among physicians and pharmacists of hospital policy despite MedRec being perceived as valuable. Physicians were the providers most responsible and involved in MedRec, who may be driven by the policy putting them at core of the process. The current findings could pave the way for the expansion of the existing MedRec policies and processes in Kuwait to include pharmacists and improve patient safety.

摘要

目的

评估科威特政府医院的医生和药剂师对药物重整(MedRec)及其相关机构政策的知识、认知和实践,并确定阻碍 MedRec 成功实施的潜在障碍。

设计

描述性、横断面研究。

地点

2017 年 1 月至 5 月期间在科威特的六家政府医院。

参与者

351 名医生和 214 名药剂师。

简要干预措施

向参与者分发了一份自我管理问卷。

主要观察指标

医院医生和药剂师对 MedRec 的知识、认知、态度和实践,以及在其机构/部门实施 MedRec 流程的主要障碍。

结果

在分发的 739 份问卷中,有 565 份完成(351 名医生和 214 名药剂师),应答率为 76.5%。结果表明,大多数参与者熟悉 MedRec 一词(n=419;75.2%),与医生相比,药剂师明显更多(n=171;81.8%比 n=248;71.3%;p=0.005)。大多数参与者(n=432;80.0%)报告称,他们认为 MedRec 对患者安全是一项有价值的流程。然而,与药剂师相比,明显更多的医生意识到他们所在机构有 MedRec 政策(n=195;55.9%比 n=78;37.9%;p<0.001),并且经常在患者到达时询问他们当前的用药清单(n=339;96.6%比 n=129;61.1%;p<0.001)并在出院时提供更新的清单(n=281;80.1%比 n=107;52.0%;p<0.001)。这些结果得到了以下发现的支持:参与者认为医生是提供者,主要负责 MedRec 的各个步骤。

结论

总体而言,尽管 MedRec 被认为是有价值的,但医生和药剂师对医院政策的认识程度较低。医生是最负责任和最参与 MedRec 的提供者,他们可能是由将他们置于该流程核心的政策驱动的。目前的调查结果可以为科威特扩大现有的 MedRec 政策和流程,包括药剂师并提高患者安全性铺平道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7d6/6589008/8651c63dff42/bmjopen-2018-027395f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验