Suppr超能文献

[基于营养导向信息软件的目标导向治疗对重度创伤性脑损伤成人营养依从率的影响分析:一项混合队列研究]

[Analysis of the effect of target-directed treatment based on nutrition-oriented information software on nutritional compliance rate in adults with severe traumatic brain injury: a mixed cohort study].

作者信息

Zhou Pingping, Pan Huibin, Zhu Xiaofei, Fu Kai, Zou Xiaoyue, Ji Zhaohui

机构信息

Department of Emergency Intensive Care Unit, Huzhou First People's Hospital, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China. Corresponding author: Ji Zhaohui, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 May;33(5):546-551. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200720-00524.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of target-oriented treatment based on nutrition-oriented information software on nutritional standards of adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

METHODS

Adult patients with sTBI admitted to the department of emergency intensive care unit (EICU) of Huzhou First People's Hospital were enrolled. Taking the online time of information software as the node on March 1st 2019, the patients who underwent early standardized enteral nutrition (EN) process from March 1st 2018 to February 28th 2019 were taken as the control group. The patients who received nutrition management by the nutritional support management system software for critical patients from March 1st 2019 to February 29th 2020 were used as the experimental group. The software was integrated with critical information system software. The effects of nutritional support in two groups were evaluated, including starting time of EN; total energy supply, total protein supply, energy compliance rate on 7 days and 14 days; the total albumin. And the related indicators of critical illness management were evaluated, including the survival rate of intensive care unit (ICU) at 28 days, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), successful rates of weaning from IMV, rapid shallow breath index (RSBI) after spontaneous breathing test (SBT), serum cholinesterase on 7 days and 14 days, etc.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with sTBI were included in the analysis, 28 in the control group and 23 in the experimental group. There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups, such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, nutritional risk score (NUTRIC), etc., which were comparable. Compared with the control group, the starting time of EN in experimental group was significantly earlier (hours: 26.82±8.33 vs. 36.73±12.86, P = 0.046). The total protein supply on 7 days and 14 days [g×kg×d: 1.87 (1.36, 1.92) vs. 1.02 (0.87, 1.67), 2.63 (1.49, 1.92) vs. 1.23 (0.89, 1.92), both P < 0.05], the total energy supply on 14 days (kJ×kg×d: 154.26±68.16 vs. 117.99±112.42, P = 0.033), the energy compliance rate on 14 days [80.0% (16/20) vs. 35.7% (10/28), P = 0.002], and the serum cholinesterase on 14 days [U/L: 5 792.5 (4 621.0, 8 131.0) vs. 4 689.7 (3 639.0, 7 892.0), P = 0.048] in experimental group were significantly increased. There were no significant differences in other indicators between the two groups [total energy supply on 7 days (kJ×kg×d): 91.50±30.50 vs. 92.88±28.16, P = 0.184; energy compliance rate on 7 days: 34.7% (8/23) vs. 21.4% (6/28), P = 0.288; total albumin (g): 97.80±46.29 vs. 114.29±52.68, P = 0.086; 28-day survival rate of ICU: 87.0% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.081; duration of IMV (days): 14.33±7.68 vs. 15.68±6.82, P = 0.074; successful rates of weaning from IMV: 69.6% vs. 67.9%, P = 0.895; RSBI after SBT (breaths×min×L): 26.84±10.69 vs. 33.68±8.94, P = 0.052; serum cholinesterase on 7 days (U/L): 4 289.7 (2 868.0, 7 291.0) vs. 3 762.2 (2 434.0, 6 892.0), P = 0.078].

CONCLUSIONS

The development and clinical application of nutrition support information software is helpful for the standardized implementation of the nutritional support treatment process for adult patients with sTBI, which is worthy of further clinical research and promotion.

摘要

目的

分析基于营养导向信息软件的目标导向治疗对成年重型颅脑损伤(sTBI)患者营养指标的影响。

方法

选取湖州市第一人民医院急诊重症监护病房(EICU)收治的成年sTBI患者。以信息软件上线时间2019年3月1日为节点,将2018年3月1日至2019年2月28日期间接受早期标准化肠内营养(EN)治疗的患者作为对照组。将2019年3月1日至2020年2月29日期间通过重症患者营养支持管理系统软件进行营养管理的患者作为试验组。该软件与重症信息系统软件集成。评估两组营养支持效果,包括EN开始时间;总能量供应、总蛋白质供应、7天和14天能量达标率;总白蛋白。并评估重症管理相关指标,包括28天重症监护病房(ICU)生存率、有创机械通气(IMV)时长、IMV撤机成功率、自主呼吸试验(SBT)后快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)、7天和14天血清胆碱酯酶等。

结果

纳入分析的sTBI患者共51例,其中对照组28例,试验组23例。两组患者的基线数据,如性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、营养风险评分(NUTRIC)等,差异均无统计学意义,具有可比性。与对照组相比,试验组EN开始时间显著提前(小时:26.82±8.33 vs. 36.73±12.86,P = 0.046)。试验组7天和14天的总蛋白质供应[g×kg×d:1.87(1.36,1.92)vs. 1.02(0.87,1.67),2.63(1.49,1.92)vs. 1.23(0.89,1.92),P均<0.05]、14天总能量供应(kJ×kg×d:154.26±68.16 vs. 117.99±112.42,P = 0.033)、14天能量达标率[80.0%(16/20)vs. 35.7%(10/28),P = 0.002]及14天血清胆碱酯酶[U/L:5 792.5(4 621.0,8 131.0)vs. 4 689.7(3 639.0,7 892.0),P = 0.048]均显著升高。两组其他指标比较,差异均无统计学意义[7天总能量供应(kJ×kg×d):91.50±30.50 vs. 92.88±28.16,P = 0.184;7天能量达标率:34.7%(8/23)vs. 21.4%(6/28),P = 0.288;总白蛋白(g):97.80±46.29 vs. 114.29±52.68,P = 0.086;ICU 28天生存率:87.0% vs. 78.6%,P = 0.081;IMV时长(天):14.33±7.68 vs. 15.68±6.82,P = 0.074;IMV撤机成功率:69.6% vs. 67.9%,P = 0.895;SBT后RSBI(次/分×升):26.84±10.69 vs. 33.68±8.94,P = 0.052;7天血清胆碱酯酶(U/L):4 289.7(2 868.0,7 291.0)vs. 3 762.2(2 434.0,6 892.0),P = 0.078]。

结论

营养支持信息软件的开发及临床应用有助于成年sTBI患者营养支持治疗过程的标准化实施,值得进一步临床研究及推广。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验