Shen Shengli, Wang Yingjin, He Xudong, Ma Ning, Gao Feng, Song Ligang, Sun Xuan, Liu Lian, Miao Zhongrong, Duan Hongzhou, Mo Dapeng
Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Front Neurol. 2021 May 25;12:668868. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.668868. eCollection 2021.
Endovascular treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) has been developed. However, the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) presents a particular challenge due to the location and tortuous route, and the outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients with stenosis of the intracranial ICA still have not been reported. This article retrospectively investigated the 30-day and 1-year outcomes of tailored endovascular treatment for patients with severe intracranial ICA stenosis from a single center. Between June 2014 and December 2017, 96 consecutive patients with severe atherosclerotic stenosis (70-99%) of the intracranial ICA were managed with endovascular treatment in Beijing Tiantan Hospital. Three different kinds of treatments [angioplasty with balloon dilatation alone (BD group), balloon-mounted stent (BMS group), and self-expanding stent (SES group)] were performed according to the characteristics of the lesions. The primary endpoints included any stroke or death within 30 days and ipsilateral ischemic stroke afterwards within 1 year. Secondary endpoints included the revascularization success rate (residual stenosis <30%) and the restenosis rate (stenosis ≥ 50%) within 1 year. The 30-day death rate was 0, and the stroke rate of all patients was 7.3% (7/96). The stroke rate was higher in the BD group (15.8%) and SES group (9.8%) than in the BMS group (0%) ( = 0.047). Thirteen (13.5%) patients suffered at least one onset of ischemic stroke in the ipsilateral ICA territory within 1 year, and there was no significant difference among the three groups ( = 0.165). The overall revascularization success rate was 93.8%, and the revascularization success rate was significantly higher in the SES group (100%) than in the BD group (78.9%) ( = 0.006). The restenosis rate of all patients within 12 months was 20.8%, and there was no significant difference among the three groups. Patients with Mori type C target lesions were more likely to suffer stroke within 30 days (25%) and restenosis within 1 year (31.3%). Both the 30-day and 1-year outcomes of tailored endovascular treatments seemed to be acceptable in the treatment of symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis of the intracranial ICA. However, this needs to be confirmed by further investigation, preferably in large multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials.
颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄(ICAS)的血管内治疗已得到发展。然而,由于颅内颈内动脉(ICA)的位置和迂曲路径,其治疗存在特殊挑战,颅内ICA狭窄患者的血管内治疗结果仍未见报道。本文回顾性研究了来自单一中心的严重颅内ICA狭窄患者接受定制血管内治疗的30天和1年结果。2014年6月至2017年12月期间,北京天坛医院对96例连续的颅内ICA严重动脉粥样硬化狭窄(70 - 99%)患者进行了血管内治疗。根据病变特点进行了三种不同的治疗[单纯球囊扩张血管成形术(BD组)、球囊扩张支架(BMS组)和自膨式支架(SES组)]。主要终点包括30天内的任何卒中或死亡以及之后1年内同侧缺血性卒中。次要终点包括1年内的血管再通成功率(残余狭窄<30%)和再狭窄率(狭窄≥50%)。30天死亡率为0,所有患者的卒中率为7.3%(7/96)。BD组(15.8%)和SES组(9.8%)的卒中率高于BMS组(0%)(P = 0.047)。13例(13.5%)患者在1年内同侧ICA区域至少发生1次缺血性卒中,三组之间无显著差异(P = 0.165)。总体血管再通成功率为93.8%,SES组(100%)的血管再通成功率显著高于BD组(78.9%)(P = 0.006)。所有患者12个月内的再狭窄率为20.8%,三组之间无显著差异。Mori C型靶病变患者在30天内更易发生卒中(25%),在1年内更易发生再狭窄(31.3%)。在治疗有症状的颅内ICA动脉粥样硬化狭窄方面,定制血管内治疗的30天和1年结果似乎是可以接受的。然而,这需要通过进一步研究来证实,最好是在大型多中心随机对照临床试验中。