Suppr超能文献

2009 - 2017年加拿大、澳大利亚、新西兰和美国原住民中新发艾滋病毒诊断率。

Rates of new HIV diagnoses among Indigenous peoples in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States: 2009-2017.

作者信息

Koehn Katrina, Cassidy-Matthews Chenoa, Pearce Margo, Aspin Clive, Pruden Harlan, Ward James, Mullen Marama, Hogg Robert S, Nicholson Valerie

机构信息

BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby.

出版信息

AIDS. 2021 Aug 1;35(10):1683-1687. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002977.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates and trends of HIV diagnoses among Indigenous peoples in Canada (First Nations, Métis, Inuit, and other non-specified), Australia (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders), the USA (American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and Other Pacific Islanders), and New Zealand (Māori).

DESIGN

We employed publicly available surveillance data from 2009 to 2017 to estimate the rate per 100 000 of HIV diagnoses. Estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) in diagnosis rates was calculated using Poisson regression.

SETTING

The four countries have passive population-based HIV surveillance programs.

PARTICIPANTS

Population estimates from respective census programs were used as rate denominators.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Estimated annual HIV diagnosis rate per 100 000 and EAPC were calculated for total Indigenous peoples, women, and men.

RESULTS

As of 2017, rates of HIV were highest in Canada (16.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 14.30--18.33) and lowest in New Zealand (1.36, 95% CI: 0.65--2.50). Australia had a rate of 3.81 (95% CI: 2.59--5.40) and the USA 3.22 (95% CI: 2.85--3.63). HIV diagnosis rates among the total Indigenous population decreased in Canada (-7.92 EAPC, 95% CI: -9.34 to -6.49) and in the USA (-4.25 EAPC, 95% CI: -5.75 to -2.73) but increased in Australia (5.10 EAPC, 95% CI: 0.39--10.08). No significant trends over time were observed in New Zealand (2.23 EAPC, 95% CI: -4.48 to 9.47).

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations to conducting cross-national comparisons, there are substantial differences in HIV diagnosis rates in these four countries that may be reflective of divergent national policies and systems that affect the health status of Indigenous peoples.

摘要

目的

比较加拿大(第一民族、梅蒂斯人、因纽特人和其他未明确分类的群体)、澳大利亚(原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民)、美国(美洲印第安人、阿拉斯加原住民、夏威夷原住民和其他太平洋岛民)和新西兰(毛利人)原住民中艾滋病毒诊断的比率和趋势。

设计

我们利用2009年至2017年公开可用的监测数据来估计每10万人中的艾滋病毒诊断率。使用泊松回归计算诊断率的估计年变化百分比(EAPC)。

背景

这四个国家都有基于人群的被动艾滋病毒监测项目。

参与者

各自人口普查项目的人口估计数用作比率分母。

主要观察指标

计算了原住民、女性和男性每10万人中估计的年度艾滋病毒诊断率和EAPC。

结果

截至2017年,加拿大的艾滋病毒感染率最高(16.22,95%置信区间(CI):14.30 - 18.33),新西兰最低(1.36,95%CI:0.65 - 2.50)。澳大利亚的感染率为3.81(95%CI:2.59 - 5.40),美国为3.22(95%CI:2.85 - 3.63)。加拿大(EAPC为 - 7.92,95%CI: - 9.34至 - 6.49)和美国(EAPC为 - 4.25,95%CI: - 5.75至 - 2.73)的原住民总体艾滋病毒诊断率下降,但澳大利亚上升(EAPC为5.10,95%CI:0.39 - 10.08)。新西兰未观察到随时间的显著趋势(EAPC为2.23,95%CI: - 4.48至9.47)。

结论

尽管进行跨国比较存在局限性,但这四个国家的艾滋病毒诊断率存在显著差异,这可能反映了影响原住民健康状况的不同国家政策和体系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验