Bioengineering and Biomechanics Laboratory, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
State University of Goiás - Unidade Trindade-GO, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 11;16(6):e0242892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242892. eCollection 2021.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different vertical positions of an asymmetrical load on the anticipatory postural adjustments phase of gait initiation. Sixty-eight college students (32 males, 36 females; age: 23.65 ± 3.21 years old; weight: 69.98 ± 8.15 kg; height: 1.74 ± 0.08 m) were enrolled in the study. Ground reaction forces and moments were collected using two force platforms. The participants completed three trials under each of the following random conditions: no-load (NL), waist uniformly distributed load (WUD), shoulder uniformly distributed load (SUD), waist stance foot load (WST), shoulder stance foot load (SST), waist swing foot load (WSW), and shoulder swing foot load (SSW). The paired Hotelling's T-square test was used to compare the experimental conditions. The center of pressure (COP) time series were significantly different for the SUD vs. NL, SST vs. NL, WST vs. NL, and WSW vs. NL comparisons. Significant differences in COP time series were observed for all comparisons between waist vs. shoulder conditions. Overall, these differences were greater when the load was positioned at the shoulders. For the center of mass (COM) time series, significant differences were found for the WUD vs. NL and WSW vs. NL conditions. However, no differences were observed with the load positioned at the shoulders. In conclusion, only asymmetrical loading at the waist produced significant differences, and the higher the extra load, the greater the effects on COP behavior. By contrast, only minor changes were observed in COM behavior, suggesting that the changes in COP (the controller) behavior are adjustments to maintain the COM (controlled object) unaltered.
本研究旨在探讨不对称负荷的不同垂直位置对步态起始预备姿势调整阶段的影响。共纳入 68 名大学生(男 32 名,女 36 名;年龄:23.65±3.21 岁;体重:69.98±8.15kg;身高:1.74±0.08m)。使用两个力台收集地面反作用力和力矩。参与者在以下随机条件下完成了三次试验:无负荷(NL)、腰部均匀分布负荷(WUD)、肩部均匀分布负荷(SUD)、腰部支撑脚负荷(WST)、肩部支撑脚负荷(SST)、腰部摆动脚负荷(WSW)和肩部摆动脚负荷(SSW)。采用配对 Hotelling's T 平方检验比较实验条件。SUD 与 NL、SST 与 NL、WST 与 NL 和 WSW 与 NL 比较时,COP 时间序列差异显著。在所有腰部与肩部条件比较中,COP 时间序列均存在显著差异。总的来说,当负荷位于肩部时,这些差异更大。对于质心(COM)时间序列,在 WUD 与 NL 和 WSW 与 NL 条件下存在显著差异。然而,当负荷位于肩部时,没有观察到差异。总之,只有腰部的不对称加载会产生显著差异,而且额外负荷越高,对 COP 行为的影响越大。相比之下,COM 行为仅观察到微小变化,这表明 COP(控制器)行为的变化是为了保持 COM(受控对象)不变而进行的调整。