Suppr超能文献

与射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者相比,射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的心理社会因素、心理健康和协调能力。

Psychosocial factors, mental health, and coordination capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Medical Care, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto von Guericke-University, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg, 39120, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Medical Care, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):3268-3278. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13468. Epub 2021 Jun 13.

Abstract

AIMS

Patients with heart failure (HF) suffer from reduced quality-of-life (QoL). We aimed to compare QoL, depression, and anxiety scores among outpatients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction and non-HF controls and its relationship to coordination capacity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-five participants were recruited prospectively at the University Hospital Jena, Germany (17 HFpEF, 18 HFrEF, and 20 non-HF controls). All participants underwent echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), 10 m walking test (10-MWT), isokinetic muscle function and coordination tests, and QoL assessments using the short form of health survey (SF-36), and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Furthermore, inflammatory biomarkers such as growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) were assessed. Patients with HFpEF showed compared with HFrEF and non-HF controls reduced QoL [mental component score (MCS): 43.6 ± 7.1 vs. 50.2 ± 10.0 vs. 50.5 ± 5.0, P = 0.03), vitality (VT): 47.5 ± 8.4 vs. 53.6 ± 8.6 vs. 57.1 ± 5.2, P = 0.004), and elevated anxiety (6.5 ± 3.2 vs. 3.3 ± 2.8 vs. 3.8 ± 2. 8, P = 0.02) and depression scores (6.5 [3.5-10.0] vs. 3.0 [1.0-6.5] vs. 2.0 [0.75-3.0], P = 0.01)]. After adjusting to multiple comparisons, anxiety remained higher in HFpEF patients compared with HFrEF (p  = 0.009). HFpEF and HFrEF patients showed reduced coordination capacity compared with non-HF controls (P < 0.05). In a logistic regression, the presence of depression score ≥8 remained an independent factor for predicting reduced coordination capacity after adjusting for peak VO , GDF-15, 10-MWT, physical component score (PCS), and peak torque of the leg [odds ratio (OR): 0.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.004-0.626, P = 0.02].

CONCLUSION

Outpatients with HFpEF had worse QoL and higher anxiety and depression scores compared with HFrEF and non-HF controls. Depression is associated with reduced QoL and is an independent predictor for reduced coordination capacity.

摘要

目的

心力衰竭(HF)患者的生活质量(QoL)降低。我们旨在比较射血分数保留型心衰(HFpEF)、射血分数降低型心衰(HFrEF)和非心衰对照组患者的 QoL、抑郁和焦虑评分,并探讨其与协调能力的关系。

方法和结果

前瞻性招募德国耶拿大学医院的 55 名患者(HFpEF 组 17 例、HFrEF 组 18 例和非心衰对照组 20 例)。所有患者均接受超声心动图、心肺运动试验(CPET)、10 米步行测试(10-MWT)、等速肌力和协调测试以及健康调查简表(SF-36)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)的 QoL 评估。此外,还评估了生长分化因子 15(GDF-15)等炎症生物标志物。与 HFrEF 和非心衰对照组相比,HFpEF 患者的 QoL 更低[精神健康评分(MCS):43.6±7.1 比 50.2±10.0 比 50.5±5.0,P=0.03],活力(VT)更低[47.5±8.4 比 53.6±8.6 比 57.1±5.2,P=0.004],焦虑(6.5±3.2 比 3.3±2.8 比 3.8±2.8,P=0.02)和抑郁评分(6.5[3.5-10.0] 比 3.0[1.0-6.5] 比 2.0[0.75-3.0],P=0.01)更高。在进行多次比较调整后,HFpEF 患者的焦虑评分仍高于 HFrEF 患者(p=0.009)。HFpEF 和 HFrEF 患者的协调能力较非心衰对照组降低(P<0.05)。在逻辑回归分析中,在调整峰值 VO 、GDF-15、10-MWT、生理健康评分(PCS)和腿部峰值扭矩后,抑郁评分≥8 仍然是预测协调能力降低的独立因素[比值比(OR):0.1,95%置信区间(CI):0.004-0.626,P=0.02]。

结论

HFpEF 门诊患者的 QoL 较 HFrEF 和非心衰对照组更差,且焦虑和抑郁评分更高。抑郁与 QoL 降低有关,是协调能力降低的独立预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be03/8318509/c9383dc90083/EHF2-8-3268-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验