Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Medical Care, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto von Guericke-University, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg, 39120, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Medical Care, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):3268-3278. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13468. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
Patients with heart failure (HF) suffer from reduced quality-of-life (QoL). We aimed to compare QoL, depression, and anxiety scores among outpatients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction and non-HF controls and its relationship to coordination capacity.
Fifty-five participants were recruited prospectively at the University Hospital Jena, Germany (17 HFpEF, 18 HFrEF, and 20 non-HF controls). All participants underwent echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), 10 m walking test (10-MWT), isokinetic muscle function and coordination tests, and QoL assessments using the short form of health survey (SF-36), and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Furthermore, inflammatory biomarkers such as growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) were assessed. Patients with HFpEF showed compared with HFrEF and non-HF controls reduced QoL [mental component score (MCS): 43.6 ± 7.1 vs. 50.2 ± 10.0 vs. 50.5 ± 5.0, P = 0.03), vitality (VT): 47.5 ± 8.4 vs. 53.6 ± 8.6 vs. 57.1 ± 5.2, P = 0.004), and elevated anxiety (6.5 ± 3.2 vs. 3.3 ± 2.8 vs. 3.8 ± 2. 8, P = 0.02) and depression scores (6.5 [3.5-10.0] vs. 3.0 [1.0-6.5] vs. 2.0 [0.75-3.0], P = 0.01)]. After adjusting to multiple comparisons, anxiety remained higher in HFpEF patients compared with HFrEF (p = 0.009). HFpEF and HFrEF patients showed reduced coordination capacity compared with non-HF controls (P < 0.05). In a logistic regression, the presence of depression score ≥8 remained an independent factor for predicting reduced coordination capacity after adjusting for peak VO , GDF-15, 10-MWT, physical component score (PCS), and peak torque of the leg [odds ratio (OR): 0.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.004-0.626, P = 0.02].
Outpatients with HFpEF had worse QoL and higher anxiety and depression scores compared with HFrEF and non-HF controls. Depression is associated with reduced QoL and is an independent predictor for reduced coordination capacity.
心力衰竭(HF)患者的生活质量(QoL)降低。我们旨在比较射血分数保留型心衰(HFpEF)、射血分数降低型心衰(HFrEF)和非心衰对照组患者的 QoL、抑郁和焦虑评分,并探讨其与协调能力的关系。
前瞻性招募德国耶拿大学医院的 55 名患者(HFpEF 组 17 例、HFrEF 组 18 例和非心衰对照组 20 例)。所有患者均接受超声心动图、心肺运动试验(CPET)、10 米步行测试(10-MWT)、等速肌力和协调测试以及健康调查简表(SF-36)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)的 QoL 评估。此外,还评估了生长分化因子 15(GDF-15)等炎症生物标志物。与 HFrEF 和非心衰对照组相比,HFpEF 患者的 QoL 更低[精神健康评分(MCS):43.6±7.1 比 50.2±10.0 比 50.5±5.0,P=0.03],活力(VT)更低[47.5±8.4 比 53.6±8.6 比 57.1±5.2,P=0.004],焦虑(6.5±3.2 比 3.3±2.8 比 3.8±2.8,P=0.02)和抑郁评分(6.5[3.5-10.0] 比 3.0[1.0-6.5] 比 2.0[0.75-3.0],P=0.01)更高。在进行多次比较调整后,HFpEF 患者的焦虑评分仍高于 HFrEF 患者(p=0.009)。HFpEF 和 HFrEF 患者的协调能力较非心衰对照组降低(P<0.05)。在逻辑回归分析中,在调整峰值 VO 、GDF-15、10-MWT、生理健康评分(PCS)和腿部峰值扭矩后,抑郁评分≥8 仍然是预测协调能力降低的独立因素[比值比(OR):0.1,95%置信区间(CI):0.004-0.626,P=0.02]。
HFpEF 门诊患者的 QoL 较 HFrEF 和非心衰对照组更差,且焦虑和抑郁评分更高。抑郁与 QoL 降低有关,是协调能力降低的独立预测因素。