Tekel J, Farkas P, Kovacicová J, Szokolay A
Food Research Institute, Bratislava, Czechoslovakia.
Nahrung. 1988;32(4):357-63. doi: 10.1002/food.19880320414.
A simple quantitative TLC method for the determination of the residues of herbicide inhibiting photosynthesis was compared with capillary GLC for the analysis of atrazine, chloridazone, lenacil, phenmedipham and desmedipham in sugar beet and sugar. No significant differences in the determination limit and precision of the two methods were found. Monitoring of herbicide residue levels in commercial sugar revealed low levels of atrazine (0.003 mg.kg-1 on average) in all the samples. This contamination level does not present a health hazard consumers.
一种用于测定抑制光合作用除草剂残留量的简单定量薄层色谱法，与毛细管气相色谱法进行了比较，以分析甜菜和糖中莠去津、氯草酮、利谷隆、甜菜安和甜菜宁的残留量。两种方法在测定限和精密度方面未发现显著差异。对市售糖中除草剂残留水平的监测显示，所有样品中莠去津含量较低（平均0.003毫克·千克-1）。这种污染水平对消费者不构成健康危害。
