Fazzio Pamela, Hardy Emily, Chamberlain Meghan, Genecin Isabel, Weiss Anna, Posner Jill, Shatzer John, Shaw Kathy
Division of Emergency Medicine The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia PA USA.
Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Dec 14;5(3):e10564. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10564. eCollection 2021 Jul.
In the emergency department (ED), residents and attendings may have a short-term relationship, such as a single shift. This poses challenges to learner assessment, instructional strategy selection, and provision of substantive feedback. We implemented a process for residents to identify goals for ED shifts; characterized residents' goals; and determined how goal identification affected learning, teaching, and feedback.
This was an observational study in a large, tertiary pediatric ED using mixed methods. Residents were asked to identify learning goals for each shift and were asked postshift if they had identified, accomplished, and/or received feedback on these goals. Goals were categorized by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Core Competencies. Predictors of goal identification, accomplishment, and receipt of feedback were determined. Residents and attendings were interviewed about their experiences.
We collected 306 end-of-shift surveys (74% response rate) and 358 goals and conducted 29 interviews. We found that: 1) Goal setting facilitated perceived learning. Residents identified goals 54% of the time. They accomplished 89% of and received feedback on 76% of goals. 2) Residents' perceived weaknesses, future practice settings, and available patients informed their goals. Most goals mapped to patient care (59%) or medical knowledge (37%) competencies. 3) Goal identification helped attendings determine residents' needs. 4) Ideal goals were specific and achievable. 5) Common barriers were busyness of the ED and difficulty creating goals. Residents were less likely to identify goals (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41 to 0.94) and receive feedback on busy evening shifts (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.37) and were most likely to receive feedback overnight (OR = 3.66, 95% CI = 1.87 to 7.14).
Asking residents to identify goals for ED shifts as an instructional strategy facilitated perceived learning, goal accomplishment, and receipt of feedback. Resident-driven goal identification is a simple and effective instructional strategy that physicians can incorporate into their precepting in the ED.
在急诊科(ED),住院医师与主治医生可能只有短期关系,比如一个班次。这给学习者评估、教学策略选择以及提供实质性反馈带来了挑战。我们实施了一个让住院医师确定急诊科班次目标的流程;对住院医师的目标进行了特征描述;并确定了目标确定如何影响学习、教学和反馈。
这是一项在大型三级儿科急诊科采用混合方法的观察性研究。要求住院医师为每个班次确定学习目标,并在班次结束后询问他们是否确定了这些目标、是否完成了这些目标以及/或者是否就这些目标收到了反馈。目标按照研究生医学教育认证委员会核心能力进行分类。确定了目标确定、完成以及收到反馈的预测因素。对住院医师和主治医生就他们的经历进行了访谈。
我们收集了306份班次结束时的调查问卷(回复率为74%)和358个目标,并进行了29次访谈。我们发现:1)目标设定促进了感知到的学习。住院医师有54%的时间确定了目标。他们完成了89%的目标,并收到了76%的目标的反馈。2)住院医师感知到的弱点、未来的执业环境以及现有的患者为他们的目标提供了依据。大多数目标映射到患者护理(59%)或医学知识(37%)能力。3)目标确定有助于主治医生确定住院医师的需求。4)理想的目标是具体且可实现的。5)常见的障碍是急诊科的忙碌以及制定目标的困难。住院医师在忙碌的晚班时确定目标的可能性较小(优势比[OR]=0.62,95%置信区间[CI]=0.41至0.94),并且收到反馈的可能性也较小(OR=0.19,95%CI=0.10至0.37),而在夜间最有可能收到反馈(OR=3.66,95%CI=1.87至7.14)。
要求住院医师确定急诊科班次目标作为一种教学策略促进了感知到的学习、目标完成以及反馈的接收。由住院医师驱动的目标确定是一种简单有效的教学策略,医生可以将其纳入在急诊科的带教工作中。