Suppr超能文献

为麻醉住院医师实施基于需求的在线反馈工具,并随后将反馈映射到美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的里程碑。

Implementation of a Needs-Based, Online Feedback Tool for Anesthesia Residents With Subsequent Mapping of the Feedback to the ACGME Milestones.

作者信息

Tanaka Pedro, Bereknyei Merrell Sylvia, Walker Kim, Zocca Jennifer, Scotto Lena, Bogetz Alyssa L, Macario Alex

机构信息

From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; †Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; ‡Department of Anesthesia, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill-Cornell University, New York, New York; and §Department of Pediatrics and ‖Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):627-635. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001647.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimizing feedback that residents receive from faculty is important for learning. The goals of this study were to (1) conduct focus groups of anesthesia residents to define what constitutes optimal feedback; (2) develop, test, and implement a web-based feedback tool; and (3) then map the contents of the written comments collected on the feedback tool to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) anesthesiology milestones.

METHODS

All 72 anesthesia residents in the program were invited to participate in 1 of 5 focus groups scheduled over a 2-month period. Thirty-seven (51%) participated in the focus groups and completed a written survey on previous feedback experiences. On the basis of the focus group input, an initial online feedback tool was pilot-tested with 20 residents and 62 feedback sessions, and then a final feedback tool was deployed to the entire residency to facilitate the feedback process. The completed feedback written entries were mapped onto the 25 ACGME anesthesiology milestones.

RESULTS

Focus groups revealed 3 major barriers to good feedback: (1) too late such as, for example, at the end of month-long clinical rotations, which was not useful because the feedback was delayed; (2) too general and not specific enough to immediately remedy behavior; and (3) too many in that the large number of evaluations that existed that were unhelpful such as those with unclear behavioral anchors compromised the overall feedback culture. Thirty residents (42% of 72 residents in the program) used the final online feedback tool with 121 feedback sessions with 61 attendings on 15 rotations at 3 hospital sites. The number of feedback tool uses per resident averaged 4.03 (standard deviation 5.08, median 2, range 1-21, 25th-75th % quartile 1-4). Feedback tool uses per faculty averaged 1.98 (standard deviation 3.2, median 1, range 1-25, 25th-75th % quartile 1-2). For the feedback question item "specific learning objective demonstrated well by the resident," this yielded 296 milestone-specific responses. The majority (71.3%) were related to the patient care competency, most commonly the anesthetic plan and conduct (35.8%) and airway management (11.1%) milestones; 10.5% were related to the interpersonal and communication skills competency, most commonly the milestones communication with other professionals (4.4%) or with patients and families (4.4%); and 8.4% were related to the practice-based learning and improvement competency, most commonly self-directed learning (6.1%). For the feedback tool item "specific learning objective that resident may improve," 67.0% were related to patient care, most commonly anesthetic plan and conduct (33.5%) followed by use/interpretation of monitoring and equipment (8.5%) and airway management (8.5%); 10.2% were related to practice-based learning and improvement, most commonly self-directed learning (6.8%); and 9.7% were related to the systems-based practice competency.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident focus groups recommended that feedback be timely and specific and be structured around a tool. A customized online feedback tool was developed and implemented. Mapping of the free-text feedback comments may assist in assessing milestones. Use of the feedback tool was lower than expected, which may indicate that it is just 1 of many implementation steps required for behavioral and culture change to support a learning environment with frequent and useful feedback.

摘要

背景

优化住院医师从教员那里获得的反馈对学习很重要。本研究的目的是:(1)对麻醉科住院医师进行焦点小组讨论,以确定什么构成最佳反馈;(2)开发、测试并实施一种基于网络的反馈工具;(3)然后将在反馈工具上收集的书面评论内容映射到毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的麻醉学里程碑上。

方法

该项目的所有72名麻醉科住院医师被邀请参加在两个月内安排的5个焦点小组中的1个。37名(51%)住院医师参加了焦点小组讨论,并完成了一份关于以往反馈经历的书面调查。根据焦点小组的意见,最初的在线反馈工具在20名住院医师和62次反馈会议上进行了试点测试,然后将最终的反馈工具部署到整个住院医师培训项目中,以促进反馈过程。将完成的反馈书面记录映射到25个ACGME麻醉学里程碑上。

结果

焦点小组揭示了良好反馈的3个主要障碍:(1)反馈太迟,例如在为期一个月的临床轮转结束时,这没有用,因为反馈被延迟了;(2)过于笼统,不够具体,无法立即纠正行为;(3)反馈太多,大量存在的无用评估,如那些行为锚定不明确的评估,损害了整体反馈文化。30名住院医师(占该项目72名住院医师的42%)使用了最终的在线反馈工具,在3个医院地点的15次轮转中与61名带教老师进行了121次反馈会议。每位住院医师使用反馈工具的次数平均为4.03次(标准差5.08,中位数2,范围1 - 21,第25 - 75百分位数1 - 4)。每位教员使用反馈工具的次数平均为1.98次(标准差3.2,中位数1,范围1 - 25,第25 - 75百分位数1 - 2)。对于反馈问题“住院医师很好地展示了特定学习目标”,这产生了296条与里程碑相关的回答。大多数(71.3%)与患者护理能力相关;最常见的是麻醉计划与实施(35.8%)和气道管理(11.1%)里程碑;10.5%与人际和沟通技能能力相关,最常见的是与其他专业人员沟通(4.4%)或与患者及家属沟通(4.(此处原文有误,应为4.4%)4%)里程碑;8.4%与基于实践的学习与改进能力相关,最常见的是自主学习(6.1%)。对于反馈工具项目“住院医师可能需要改进的特定学习目标”,67.0%与患者护理相关,最常见的是麻醉计划与实施(33.5%),其次是监测和设备的使用/解读(8.5%)和气道管理(8.5%);10.2%与基于实践的学习与改进相关,最常见的是自主学习(6.8%);9.7%与基于系统的实践能力相关。

结论

住院医师焦点小组建议反馈应及时、具体,并围绕一种工具进行构建。开发并实施了一种定制的在线反馈工具。对自由文本反馈评论的映射可能有助于评估里程碑。反馈工具的使用低于预期,这可能表明它只是行为和文化变革所需的众多实施步骤之一,以支持一个具有频繁且有用反馈的学习环境。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验