DesPain Angelica W, Gutman Colleen K, Cruz Andrea T, Aronson Paul L, Chamberlain James M, Chang Todd P, Florin Todd A, Kaplan Ron L, Nigrovic Lise E, Pruitt Christopher M, Thompson Amy D, Gonzalez Victor M, Mistry Rakesh D
Division of Emergency Medicine Children's National Hospital The George Washington University School of Medicine Washington DC USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville Florida USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Mar 9;5(3):e10585. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10585. eCollection 2021 Jul.
There is a need for pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) researchers, but the current state of PEM fellow research training is not well described. We sought to (1) describe resources and gaps in PEM fellowship research training and (2) assess agreement between fellow and program director (PD) perceptions of these in fellow research experience.
Surveys were distributed electronically to U.S. PEM fellows and PDs from March to April 2020. Fellows and PDs were queried on program research infrastructure and current gaps in fellow research experience. For programs that had at least one fellow and PD response, each fellow response was compared to their PD's corresponding response (reference standard). For each binary survey item, we determined the percent of responses with agreement between the fellow and PD.
Of 79 fellowship programs, 70 (89%) were represented with at least one response, including responses from 59 PDs (75%) and 218 fellows (39% of all fellows, representing 80% of programs). Fellows and PDs identified mentorship and faculty engagement as the most important needs for successful fellowship research; for every one fellow there was a median of 0.8 potential faculty mentors in the division. Twenty percent of fellows were not satisfied with mentorship opportunities. There was no association between fellow career research intent (high, defined as ≥20% dedicated time, or low) with current year of training (p = 0.88), program size (p = 0.67), and area of research focus (p = 0.40). Fellows were often unaware of research being performed by division faculty.
PEM fellows were not consistently aware of resources available to support research training. To better support PEM fellows' research training, many programs may need to expand mentorship and increase fellows' awareness of local and external resources and opportunities.
儿科急诊医学(PEM)研究人员存在需求,但PEM专科住院医师研究培训的现状尚无详尽描述。我们试图(1)描述PEM专科住院医师研究培训的资源与差距,以及(2)评估专科住院医师与项目主任(PD)对这些专科住院医师研究经历的看法之间的一致性。
2020年3月至4月,通过电子方式向美国PEM专科住院医师和项目主任发放调查问卷。就项目研究基础设施以及专科住院医师研究经历当前存在的差距向专科住院医师和项目主任进行询问。对于至少有一名专科住院医师和项目主任回复的项目,将每名专科住院医师的回复与其项目主任的相应回复(参考标准)进行比较。对于每个二元调查项目,我们确定专科住院医师与项目主任之间意见一致的回复百分比。
在79个专科住院医师培训项目中,70个(89%)至少有一份回复,包括59名项目主任(75%)和218名专科住院医师的回复(占所有专科住院医师的39%,代表80%的项目)。专科住院医师和项目主任将导师指导和教员参与确定为专科住院医师研究取得成功的最重要需求;该科室中,每名专科住院医师平均有0.8名潜在教员导师。20%的专科住院医师对导师指导机会不满意。专科住院医师的职业研究意向(高,定义为≥20%的专用时间,或低)与当前培训年份(p = 0.88)、项目规模(p = 0.67)和研究重点领域(p = 0.40)之间无关联。专科住院医师常常不知道科室教员正在开展的研究。
PEM专科住院医师并非始终了解可用于支持研究培训的资源。为了更好地支持PEM专科住院医师的研究培训,许多项目可能需要扩大导师指导范围,并提高专科住院医师对本地和外部资源及机会的认识。