Key Laboratory of Quality & Safety Control for Milk and Dairy Products of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Dairy Products of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China; Milk and Milk Products Inspection Center of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Quality & Safety Control for Milk and Dairy Products of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Dairy Products of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China; Milk and Milk Products Inspection Center of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Toxicology. 2021 Jun 30;458:152835. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.152835. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) and ochratoxin A (OTA) are pernicious mycotoxins widely co-existing in the environment. However, nephrotoxicity and underlying mechanism induced by AFM1 coupled with OTA still remain to be explored. In this study, CD-1 mice were treated with 3.5 mg/kg b.w. AFM1, OTA, and AFM1 + OTA for 35 days, and UPLC-MS-based metabolomics method was effectuated to investigate metabolomic profiles of mice kidney. Subsequent experiments on human renal proximal tubular (HK-2) cells were performed to dig out the causal connections between distinguished differential metabolites and nephrotoxicity. Compared with DMSO vehicle group, all three toxin treatments (AFM1 and OTA alone, and in combination) significantly reduced final body weight, and remarkably elevated the concentration of serum creatinine (SCr) and caused abnormal histological phenotypes (shown by histopathological slices). OTA, AFM1 + OTA but not AFM1 reduced the relative weight index of kidney. These phenotypic results indicated that AFM1 and OTA were both toxic to the body, and it seemed that OTA exhibited a notable impairment to kidney while AFM1 had similar but limited effect compared with OTA. Further metabolomics analysis showed that when AFM1 and OTA were combined together, OTA exerted dominant effect on the alteration of metabolic processes. There were few differences in the number of changed metabolites between OTA and AFM1 + OTA group. Among the differentially expressed metabolites affected by OTA, and AFM1 + OTA, lysophosphatidylcholines (LysoPCs) were identified as the main type with significant upregulation, in which LysoPC (16:0) accounted for the most prime proportion. Western blotting results of HK-2 cells showed that single OTA and AFM1 + OTA increased the apoptotic protein expressions of Bax, caspase 3 and PARP, and decreased the expression of Bcl-2; while AFM1 only raised the expression of caspase 3. LysoPC (16:0) but not LysoPC (18:1) lifted the protein level of caspase 3 and PARP in HK-2 cells, and reduced the level of Bcl-2. Taken together, this study is the first effort trying to assess nephrotoxicity of AFM1 with OTA, and we guessed that OTA had a more pronounced toxicity to kidney in contrast to AFM1. No obvious synergism between AFM1 and OTA was found to contribute to the occurrence or development of nephropathy. LysoPC (16:0) might be the pivotal metabolite in response to single OTA and combined AFM1 + OTA engendering renal injury.
黄曲霉毒素 M1(AFM1)和赭曲霉毒素 A(OTA)是两种广泛存在于环境中的有害真菌毒素。然而,AFM1 联合 OTA 引起的肾毒性及其潜在机制仍有待探索。在这项研究中,用 3.5mg/kg b.w. 的 AFM1、OTA 和 AFM1+OTA 处理 CD-1 小鼠 35 天,采用 UPLC-MS 代谢组学方法研究小鼠肾脏的代谢组学特征。随后在人肾近端小管(HK-2)细胞中进行了后续实验,以挖掘区分差异代谢物与肾毒性之间的因果关系。与 DMSO 溶剂组相比,三种毒素处理(AFM1 和 OTA 单独处理,以及联合处理)均显著降低了终体重,并显著提高了血清肌酐(SCr)浓度,导致组织学表型异常(表现在组织病理学切片中)。OTA、AFM1+OTA 但不是 AFM1 降低了肾脏的相对重量指数。这些表型结果表明,AFM1 和 OTA 对机体均有毒性,并且似乎 OTA 对肾脏的损害更为明显,而 AFM1 与 OTA 相比则具有相似但有限的作用。进一步的代谢组学分析表明,当 AFM1 和 OTA 联合使用时,OTA 对代谢过程的改变表现出主导作用。OTA 组和 AFM1+OTA 组之间变化代谢物的数量差异不大。在受 OTA 和 AFM1+OTA 影响的差异表达代谢物中,溶血磷脂酰胆碱(LysoPCs)被鉴定为主要类型,其中 LysoPC(16:0)占比最大。HK-2 细胞的 Western blot 结果表明,单一 OTA 和 AFM1+OTA 增加了 Bax、caspase 3 和 PARP 的凋亡蛋白表达,降低了 Bcl-2 的表达;而 AFM1 仅提高了 caspase 3 的表达。LysoPC(16:0)而非 LysoPC(18:1)升高了 HK-2 细胞中 caspase 3 和 PARP 的蛋白水平,并降低了 Bcl-2 的水平。总之,本研究首次尝试评估 AFM1 与 OTA 联合的肾毒性,我们推测与 AFM1 相比,OTA 对肾脏的毒性更为明显。未发现 AFM1 和 OTA 之间存在明显的协同作用,导致肾病的发生或发展。LysoPC(16:0)可能是响应单一 OTA 和联合 AFM1+OTA 导致肾损伤的关键代谢物。