• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Primary care professionals' attitudes towards digital health interventions for common mental disorders: study protocol for a mixed methods systematic review.基层医疗专业人员对常见心理障碍的数字健康干预措施的态度:一项混合方法系统评价的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 14;11(6):e045657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045657.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Implementation of e-mental health interventions for informal caregivers of adults with chronic diseases: a protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review with a qualitative comparative analysis.电子心理健康干预在慢性病成人非正式照护者中的实施:一项混合方法系统评价及定性比较分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e035406. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035406.
4
Cross-disciplinary working between gynaecologists and mental healthcare professionals: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.跨学科的妇产科医生和精神保健专业人员之间的合作:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 16;14(10):e091378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091378.
5
Effects of mass casualty incidents on anxiety, depression and PTSD among doctors and nurses: a systematic review protocol.大量伤亡事件对医生和护士焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍的影响:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 11;13(9):e075478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075478.
6
Interventions to integrate care for people with serious mental illness and substance use disorders: a systematic scoping review protocol.干预措施以整合严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍患者的护理:系统范围界定综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 30;9(10):e031122. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031122.
7
Motivations and willingness to provide care from a geographical distance, and the impact of distance care on caregivers' mental and physical health: a mixed-method systematic review protocol.动机和意愿提供地理距离上的护理,以及远程护理对护理人员身心健康的影响:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e045660. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045660.
8
Digital Education for the Management of Chronic Wounds in Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.医疗保健专业人员慢性伤口管理的数字教育:数字健康教育合作组织的系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 25;8(3):e12488. doi: 10.2196/12488.
9
Patients' and health professionals' attitudes and perceptions towards the initiation of preventive drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies.患者和卫生专业人员对启动心血管疾病一级预防预防性药物的态度和看法:定性研究系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 11;9(4):e025587. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025587.
10
Interventions to reduce stigma towards mental disorders in young people: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施以减少年轻人对精神障碍的污名化:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e045726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045726.

本文引用的文献

1
Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods.综合定量和定性证据以为复杂干预措施指南提供信息:阐明目的、设计并概述一些方法。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000893. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893. eCollection 2019.
2
GPs' attitudes towards digital technologies for depression: an online survey in primary care.全科医生对抑郁症数字技术的态度:初级保健中的在线调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Mar;69(680):e164-e170. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X700721. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
3
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家层面 195 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2017 年 354 种疾病和伤害导致的发病率、患病率和伤残损失寿命年:基于 2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
4
Attitudes towards digital treatment for depression: A European stakeholder survey.对抑郁症数字治疗的态度:一项欧洲利益相关者调查。
Internet Interv. 2017 Jan 25;8:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.01.001. eCollection 2017 Jun.
5
E-Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions.针对患有长期身体疾病的儿童和青少年焦虑与抑郁的电子健康干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012489. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012489.pub2.
6
The Treatment of Depression in Primary Care.基层医疗中的抑郁症治疗。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Oct 27;114(43):721-728. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0721.
7
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
8
Barriers to Office-Based Mental Health Care and Interest in E-Communication With Providers: A Survey Study.基于办公室的心理健康护理障碍及与提供者进行电子沟通的意愿:一项调查研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Aug 1;3(3):e35. doi: 10.2196/mental.6068.
9
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
10
Clinical Practice Models for the Use of E-Mental Health Resources in Primary Health Care by Health Professionals and Peer Workers: A Conceptual Framework.临床实践模型:医疗保健专业人员和同伴工作者在初级卫生保健中使用电子心理健康资源:概念框架。
JMIR Ment Health. 2015 Mar 23;2(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/mental.4200. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar.

基层医疗专业人员对常见心理障碍的数字健康干预措施的态度:一项混合方法系统评价的研究方案。

Primary care professionals' attitudes towards digital health interventions for common mental disorders: study protocol for a mixed methods systematic review.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Center for Dementia Care, Institute of Applied Nursing Sciences, Department of Health, University of Applied Sciences of Eastern Switzerland, St Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 14;11(6):e045657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045657.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045657
PMID:34127490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8204153/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mental disorders such as depression are common, and an estimated 264 million people are affected by them throughout the world. In recent years, studies on digital health interventions to treat mental disorders have shown evidence of their efficacy, and interest in using them has increased as a result. In the primary care setting, depression and anxiety are the two most frequently diagnosed and treated mental disorders. When they do not refer them to specialists, primary care professionals such as general practitioners treat patients with mental disorders themselves but have insufficient time to treat them adequately. Furthermore, there is a shortage of psychotherapists and those that exist have long waiting lists for an appointment. The purpose of this mixed methods systematic review is to explore the attitudes of primary care professionals towards the use of digital health interventions in the treatment of patients with mental disorders. Their attitudes will provide an indication whether digital mental health interventions can effectively complement standard care in the primary care setting.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We searched for qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies published in English, German, Spanish, Russian, French and Dutch after January 2010 for inclusion in the review. The included studies must involve digital mental health interventions conducted via computer and/or mobile devices in the primary care setting. The search was conducted in July 2020 in the following electronic bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science Core Collection. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts and extract data. We will use the 'Integrated methodology' framework to combine both quantitative and qualitative data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required. We will disseminate the results of the mixed methods systematic review in a peer-reviewed journal and scientific conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020188879.

摘要

简介

精神障碍(如抑郁症)较为常见,据估计,全世界有 2.64 亿人受其影响。近年来,有关数字健康干预措施治疗精神障碍的研究已证明其疗效,因此人们对其的兴趣日益增加。在初级保健环境中,抑郁和焦虑是最常被诊断和治疗的两种精神障碍。当初级保健专业人员未将患者转介给专家时,他们会自行治疗患有精神障碍的患者,但他们没有足够的时间充分治疗患者。此外,精神治疗师短缺,现有的精神治疗师预约等待时间也很长。本混合方法系统评价的目的是探讨初级保健专业人员对使用数字健康干预措施治疗精神障碍患者的态度。他们的态度将表明数字心理健康干预措施是否可以有效地补充初级保健环境中的标准护理。

方法和分析

我们在 2020 年 7 月在以下电子书目数据库中搜索了自 2010 年 1 月以来发表的英文、德文、西班牙文、俄文、法文和荷兰文的定性、定量和混合方法研究,以纳入本综述。纳入的研究必须涉及通过计算机和/或移动设备在初级保健环境中进行的数字心理健康干预措施。两名评审员将独立筛选标题、摘要和全文并提取数据。我们将使用“综合方法”框架来结合定量和定性数据。

伦理和传播

不需要伦理批准。我们将在同行评议的期刊和科学会议上传播混合方法系统评价的结果。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020188879。