Suppr超能文献

归因于颞下颌关节紊乱病的头痛:根据颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准的轴I和轴II研究结果

Headache Attributed to Temporomandibular Disorders: Axis I and II Findings According to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.

作者信息

Reiter Shoshana, Emodi-Perlman Alona, Kasiel Hanita, Abboud Waseem, Friedman-Rubin Pessia, Arias Orit Winocur, Manor Yifat

出版信息

J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2021;35(2):119-128. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2863.

Abstract

AIMS

To analyze Axis I and II findings of patients diagnosed as having painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD) with headache attributed to TMD (HAattrTMD) in order to assess whether HAattrTMD is associated with a specific Axis I and II profile suggestive of the central sensitization process.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 220 patients with painful TMD divided into those with (n = 60) and those without (n = 160) HAattrTMD, and the patients were compared for Axis I and II results according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 27.3% of the patients received a diagnosis of HAattrTMD. Myofascial pain with referral was significantly more common in the HAattrTMD group (P < .001), while local myalgia was significantly more common in the non-HAattrTMD group (P < .001). Characteristic pain intensity was significantly higher in the HAattrTMD group (P = .003), which also showed significantly higher levels of depression (P = .002), nonspecific physical symptoms (P = .004), graded chronic pain (P = .008), and pain catastrophizing (P = .013). Nonspecific physical symptoms were positively associated with HAattrTMD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.098, 95% CI = 1.006 to 1.200, P = .037). Local myalgia was negatively associated with HAattrTMD (OR = .295, 95% CI = 0.098 to 0.887, P = .030).

CONCLUSIONS

Painful TMD patients who report headache in the temple area and are diagnosed as having local myalgia rather than myofascial pain with referral probably do not have HAattrTMD. The diagnosis of HAattrTMD may point to a central sensitization process and possible current/future chronic TMD conditions.

摘要

目的

分析被诊断为患有疼痛性颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)且伴有归因于TMD的头痛(HAattrTMD)患者的轴I和轴II检查结果,以评估HAattrTMD是否与提示中枢敏化过程的特定轴I和轴II特征相关。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了220例疼痛性TMD患者,分为伴有(n = 60)和不伴有(n = 160)HAattrTMD的患者,并根据TMD诊断标准(DC/TMD)对患者的轴I和轴II结果进行比较。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共有27.3%的患者被诊断为HAattrTMD。牵涉性肌筋膜疼痛在HAattrTMD组中明显更常见(P < 0.001),而局部肌痛在非HAattrTMD组中明显更常见(P < 0.001)。HAattrTMD组的特征性疼痛强度明显更高(P = 0.003),该组还表现出明显更高水平的抑郁(P = 0.002)、非特异性躯体症状(P = 0.004)、分级慢性疼痛(P = 0.008)和疼痛灾难化(P = 0.013)。非特异性躯体症状与HAattrTMD呈正相关(优势比[OR]=1.098,95%可信区间=1.006至1.200,P = 0.037)。局部肌痛与HAattrTMD呈负相关(OR = 0.295,95%可信区间=0.098至0.887,P = 0.030)。

结论

报告颞部头痛且被诊断为局部肌痛而非牵涉性肌筋膜疼痛的疼痛性TMD患者可能没有HAattrTMD。HAattrTMD的诊断可能指向中枢敏化过程以及可能的当前/未来慢性TMD情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验