School of Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
School of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Aug;30(4):847-874. doi: 10.1111/inm.12895. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
Recovery is internationally recognized as a concept to improve the well-being of consumers. Compared with the numerous measures assessing consumer perspectives of recovery, only a few measures have been developed to assess Mental Health Professionals' (MHPs) perspectives of recovery to inform practice. The present study aims to systematically review the literature to identify existing measures designed to assess MHPs' perspectives of recovery and evaluate their psychometric properties, and the methodological considerations of the design and use of these measures. We searched literature across eight electronic databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PsyArticles, CINAHL, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google scholar. We identified 2631 articles across all databases. Of these, 40 articles met the inclusion criteria, which comprised 14 original measures assessing mental health recovery and 26 articles reassessing the psychometric properties of the original 14 measures. Our results suggested that while there are existing measures for assessing MHPs' perspectives of recovery, only a few of these measures met standard evaluation criteria for psychometric properties. Specifically, the validation of the identified measures is still in its infancy. For example, the easiness of applying the measures differs among the studies, and only a few of the measures fully involved consumers in the scale development phase. The implication of the findings for future use and development of recovery measures in mental health practice and research are discussed and recommended.
康复在国际上被认为是一个提高消费者福祉的概念。与评估消费者对康复的看法的众多措施相比,只有少数措施被开发出来评估心理健康专业人员对康复的看法,以指导实践。本研究旨在系统地回顾文献,以确定现有的评估心理健康专业人员对康复看法的测量工具,并评估其心理测量特性,以及设计和使用这些测量工具的方法学考虑因素。我们在八个电子数据库中搜索了文献:MEDLINE、Web of Science、PsycINFO、PsyArticles、CINAHL、Scopus、EMBASE 和 Google scholar。我们在所有数据库中都找到了 2631 篇文章。其中,40 篇文章符合纳入标准,其中包括 14 项评估心理健康康复的原始测量工具和 26 篇重新评估原始 14 项测量工具的心理测量特性的文章。我们的研究结果表明,虽然有现有的评估心理健康专业人员对康复的看法的测量工具,但只有少数这些工具符合心理测量特性的标准评估标准。具体来说,确定的测量工具的验证仍处于起步阶段。例如,这些测量工具的应用难易程度在不同的研究中有所不同,只有少数测量工具在量表开发阶段充分让消费者参与。讨论并推荐了这些发现对未来在心理健康实践和研究中使用和开发康复措施的意义。