Kulbay Aysel, Joelsson-Alm Eva, Tammelin Ann
Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Infectious diseases, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jun 15;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00619-x.
To support a uniform and evidence-based practice for indwelling urinary catheterization in adults The European association of Urology Nurses (EAUN) published guidelines for this procedure in 2012. The Swedish national guidelines are based on the sterility precautions advocated by EAUN. Some hospitals have local guidelines with other requirements concerning sterility and leave to staff to decide how to perform the catheterization. The aim of this descriptive survey was to investigate the nurses´ self-reported sterility precautions during indwelling urethral catheterization at two acute-care hospitals, where the local guidelines differ in their sterility requirements. The study also aimed to analyze factors affecting conformity with sterility precautions in the EAUN-guidelines.
A structured questionnaire with questions concerning the participant, working conditions and performance of indwelling urethral catheterization was left to 931 nurses in two acute care hospitals. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for descriptive statistics. Logistic regression was used to analyze variables associated with practicing the sterility precautions in the EAUN-guidelines.
Answers were obtained from 852 persons (91.5%). Most of the participants called their insertion technique "non-sterile". Regardless of designation of the technique the participants said that the indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) should be kept sterile during procedure. Despite that not everyone used sterile equipment to maintain sterility of the catheter. The nurses´ conformity with all the sterility precautions in the EAUN-guidelines were associated with working at departments for surgery and cardiology (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.69-3.27), use of sterile set for catheterization (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.42-2.97), use of sterile drapes for dressing on insertion area (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.24-2.96) and using the term "sterile technique" for indwelling urethral catheterization (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.11-2.43).
Only 55-74% of the nurses practiced one or more precautions that secured sterility of the IUC thus demonstrating a gap between the EAUN-guidelines and the actual performance. Adherence to the guidelines was associated with factors that facilitated an aseptic performance such as using a sterile set and sterile drapes. Healthcare-settings should ensure education and skill training including measures to ensure that the IUC is kept sterile during insertion.
为支持成人留置导尿的统一且基于证据的操作,欧洲泌尿外科护士协会(EAUN)于2012年发布了该操作的指南。瑞典国家指南基于EAUN倡导的无菌预防措施。一些医院有当地指南,对无菌有其他要求,并让工作人员自行决定如何进行导尿操作。这项描述性调查的目的是调查两家急症护理医院在留置尿道导尿期间护士自我报告的无菌预防措施,这两家医院的当地指南在无菌要求方面存在差异。该研究还旨在分析影响符合EAUN指南中无菌预防措施的因素。
向两家急症护理医院的931名护士发放了一份结构化问卷,问卷内容涉及参与者、工作条件和留置尿道导尿的操作。采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行描述性统计。使用逻辑回归分析与遵循EAUN指南中的无菌预防措施相关的变量。
共获得852人(91.5%)的回复。大多数参与者称其插入技术为“非无菌”。无论技术如何命名,参与者表示在操作过程中留置导尿管(IUC)应保持无菌。尽管并非所有人都使用无菌设备来保持导尿管的无菌状态。护士对EAUN指南中所有无菌预防措施的遵循情况与在外科和心脏科工作相关(比值比2.35,95%置信区间1.69 - 3.27)、使用无菌导尿包(比值比2.06,95%置信区间1.42 - 2.97)、在插入区域使用无菌手术巾进行包扎(比值比1.91,95%置信区间1.24 - 2.96)以及将留置尿道导尿称为“无菌技术”(比值比1.64,95%置信区间1.11 - 2.43)。
只有55% - 74%的护士采取了一项或多项确保IUC无菌的预防措施,这表明EAUN指南与实际操作之间存在差距。对指南的遵循与促进无菌操作的因素相关,如使用无菌导尿包和无菌手术巾。医疗机构应确保进行教育和技能培训,包括采取措施确保在插入IUC期间保持其无菌状态。