INRAE, UR RiverLy, 69625, Villeurbanne, France.
Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR ECOSYS, 78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jul;28(28):38448-38454. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14863-w. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
Several sustainable development goals cannot be achieved without implementing a new generation of environmental measures to better preserve or restore biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, understanding and addressing biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation is a challenging problem that is not solvable without integrating the best and latest science. It is crucial to enhance the legibility of this knowledge for decision-makers and policymakers following good-practice standards of scientific assessment. This is the main objective of collective scientific assessments (CSAs), as carried out by the French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE) since the early 2000s following a documented procedure to inform public policy and foster public debate on complex interdisciplinary issues. This article describes the main steps of the CSA procedure designed by INRAE's Directorate for Collective Scientific Assessment, Foresight and Advanced Studies, from formulation of the initial question asked by public or para-public bodies (typically ministry divisions or environmental agencies) to wider dissemination of the results and conclusions. This process description is then illustrated through the example of a CSA recently commissioned by three French Ministries (for Ecology, for Research, and for Agriculture) regarding (i) contamination of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems by plant protection products (PPPs); (ii) the resulting effects on biodiversity and ecosystem services; and (iii) possible prevention and mitigation strategies. The capacity of this kind of CSA to inform public debate and policymaking is then exemplified through a description of the main outcomes generated by the latest CSA dealing with the adverse effects of PPPs. We also provide a short overview of some key expectations from the current CSA, with a focus on the recent development of the ecosystem service approach in ecological risk assessments of PPPs in the European Union. This illustration demonstrates that CSAs, which are applicable to a wide variety of complex interdisciplinary questions that are not limited to environmental issues, are a relevant tool to inform public debate and policymaking.
没有实施新一代环境措施来更好地保护或恢复生物多样性和生态系统服务,就无法实现若干可持续发展目标。然而,理解和解决生物多样性丧失和生态系统退化是一个具有挑战性的问题,如果不综合运用最佳和最新的科学知识,这个问题就无法解决。至关重要的是,要按照科学评估的良好实践标准,提高决策者和政策制定者对这些知识的理解能力。这是法国国家农业、食品和环境研究院(INRAE)自 21 世纪初以来开展集体科学评估(CSA)的主要目标,这些评估是按照为公共政策提供信息和促进关于复杂跨学科问题的公共辩论的文件程序进行的。本文描述了 INRAE 集体科学评估、展望和高级研究局设计的 CSA 程序的主要步骤,从公共或准公共机构(通常是部委司或环境机构)提出的初始问题的制定到更广泛地传播结果和结论。然后,通过最近由三个法国部委(生态部、研究部和农业部)委托的 CSA 的例子来说明这个过程描述,该 CSA 涉及(i)植物保护产品(PPPs)对陆地、淡水和海洋生态系统的污染;(ii)对生物多样性和生态系统服务的影响;以及(iii)可能的预防和缓解策略。通过描述最新 CSA 中关于 PPPs 的不利影响的主要结果,说明了这种 CSA 为公共辩论和决策制定提供信息的能力。我们还简要概述了当前 CSA 的一些关键期望,重点介绍了 PPPs 生态风险评估中生态系统服务方法的最新发展。这种说明表明,CSA 适用于各种复杂的跨学科问题,不仅限于环境问题,是为公共辩论和决策制定提供信息的一个相关工具。