Department of Pharmacy and Health Systems Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113361. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13361.
Long-term care (LTC) residents may be susceptible to social isolation if living in facilities located in neighborhoods lacking social connection.
To characterize the social isolation of residents living in LTC facilities in the US.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study included 730 524 LTC residents from 14 224 LTC facilities in 8652 zip code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) in the US in 2011. A nationwide LTC database with ZCTA data was linked to population-level geographic data from the US Census Bureau. Statistical analysis was performed from January 2019 to December 2020.
The primary variable of interest was the social isolation of LTC neighborhoods defined as the percentage of households in the ZCTA with individuals aged 65 years or older who lived alone and categorized into quartiles of social isolation.
Maps were generated to illustrate geographic variation of LTC facilities at the ZCTA level by the quartile of socially isolated neighborhoods. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the adjusted likelihood that LTC facilities were located in areas of highest social isolation. We also used multilevel logistic regression models to assess the association between the social isolation of neighborhoods of LTC facilities and 30-day all-cause mortality after LTC admission. Subgroup analyses were conducted by race and ethnicity.
Among 33 120 ZCTAs in the US, 8652 (26.1%) had at least 1 LTC facility. Among the 730 524 LTC residents included in the study's 14 224 LTC facilities, 458 136 (62.71%) were female, 610 802 (83.61%) were non-Hispanic White, and 419 654 (57.45%) were aged 80 years or older. Location of LTC facilities was associated with increasing levels of social isolation (quartile 1 = 9.72% [n = 840]; quartile 2 = 18.60% [n = 1607]; quartile 3 = 32.23% [n = 2784]; quartile 4 = 39.45% [n = 3408]; P < .001). In multivariate models, LTC facilities were 8 times more likely to be located in ZCTAs with the highest percentages of older adults residing in single-occupancy households (odds ratio [OR], 8.46; 95% CI, 7.44-9.65; P < .001), compared with ZCTAs with the lowest percentages. This association held across ZCTAs with a majority population of African American and Hispanic individuals, although it was strongest in ZCTAs with a majority population of White individuals. LTC residents entering facilities in neighborhoods with the highest levels of social isolation among older adults had a 17% higher risk of 30-day mortality (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.25; P < .001) compared with those in neighborhoods with the lowest levels of social isolation among older adults.
This study found that LTC facilities were often located in socially isolated neighborhoods, suggesting the need for special attention and strategies to keep LTC residents connected to their family and friends for optimal health.
长期护理(LTC)居民如果居住在缺乏社会联系的社区的设施中,可能容易受到社会隔离的影响。
描述美国 LTC 设施居民的社会隔离情况。
设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究包括来自美国 2011 年 8652 个邮政编码区域(ZCTA)的 14224 个 LTC 设施中的 730524 名 LTC 居民。一个全国性的 LTC 数据库与美国人口普查局的人口水平地理数据相链接。统计分析于 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月进行。
主要关注的变量是 LTC 社区的社会隔离程度,定义为 ZCTA 中 65 岁及以上独居的家庭比例,并分为四个社会隔离四分位数。
生成地图,以说明 ZCTA 层面上 LTC 设施的地理分布情况,按社会隔离程度的四分位数进行划分。使用广义估计方程来估计 LTC 设施位于社会隔离程度最高的地区的可能性。我们还使用多水平逻辑回归模型来评估 LTC 设施周围社区的社会隔离程度与 LTC 入院后 30 天全因死亡率之间的关联。按种族和族裔进行亚组分析。
在美国的 33120 个 ZCTA 中,有 8652 个(26.1%)至少有一个 LTC 设施。在研究中包括的 14224 个 LTC 设施中的 730524 名 LTC 居民中,458136 名(62.71%)为女性,610802 名(83.61%)为非西班牙裔白人,419654 名(57.45%)年龄在 80 岁或以上。LTC 设施的位置与社会隔离程度的增加有关(四分位数 1=9.72%[n=840];四分位数 2=18.60%[n=1607];四分位数 3=32.23%[n=2784];四分位数 4=39.45%[n=3408];P<0.001)。在多变量模型中,LTC 设施位于 65 岁以上老年人独居家庭比例最高的 ZCTA 的可能性是位于比例最低的 ZCTA 的 8 倍(优势比[OR],8.46;95%CI,7.44-9.65;P<0.001)。这种关联在以非裔美国人和西班牙裔个体为主的 ZCTA 中仍然存在,尽管在以白人为主的 ZCTA 中关联最强。进入老年人社会隔离程度最高的社区的 LTC 居民,其 30 天死亡率风险增加 17%(OR,1.17;95%CI,1.10-1.25;P<0.001),而进入老年人社会隔离程度最低的社区的 LTC 居民则增加了 17%。
这项研究发现,LTC 设施经常位于社会隔离的社区,这表明需要特别关注和策略,以使 LTC 居民与家人和朋友保持联系,以达到最佳健康状态。